Skip to main content

Electronic Medicines Management: Support for Professional Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Principles of Electronic Prescribing

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

  • 799 Accesses

Abstract

The changing role of the various professions in the health services provides implementers of EP systems with the challenge of how professional roles are recognized and regulated within an EP system. This will be discussed further in Chap. 7, concerning the use of EP systems by non-medical prescribers. However, if systems are to be accepted by users, designers and implementers will also need to consider how EP systems will support, or can be configured to support, the needs of healthcare professionals in their everyday practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, with nurse prescribers. See Courtenay et al. [1].

  2. 2.

    The attitudes of nursing staff were noted as being a key factor in the adoption of the Winchester EP system (see Case Study in Chap. 2).

  3. 3.

    This was found to be a key user requirement at Winchester. Also, at Burton on Trent, the fact that system screens looked like forms that staff were already familiar with was an important factor in the acceptance of the system.

References

  1. Courtenay M, Carey N, Burke J. Independent extended and supplementary nurse prescribing practice in the UK: a national questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44:1093–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marriott J, Curtis C, et al. The influence of electronic prescribing on pharmacist clinical intervention reporting. Int J Pharm Pract. 2004;12(Suppl):R44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Curtis C, Ford NG. Paperless electronic prescribing in a district general hospital. Pharm J. 1997;259:734–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adcock H. Electronic solution to intervention monitoring aids clinical governance. Hosp Pharm. 2006;13:137.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goundrey-Smith SJ. Electronic prescribing – technology designed for the healthcare setting. Pharm J. 2007;278:677–8, 683.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shane R. Computerized physician order entry: challenges and opportunities. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002;59:286–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Willson W, Buisson J. New IT demands new ways of working. Pharm J. 2003;272:33.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Franklin BD, O’Grady K, et al. The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before and after study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:279–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Poissant L, et al. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:505–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2526–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunt DL. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280:1339–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tierney WM, Miller ME, et al. Physician inpatient order writing on microcomputer workstations: effects on resource utilisation. J Am Med Assoc. 1993;269:379–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, et al. A computer assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents. N Eng J Med. 1998;338:232–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michelis KC, Hassouna B, et al. Effect of electronic prescription on attainment of cholesterol goals. Clin Cardiol. 2011;34:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bates DW, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:523–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schiff GD, Rucker TD. Computerised prescribing: building the electronic infrastructure for better medication usage. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;279:1024–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. The Good Practice Guidelines for GP Electronic Patient Records. Department of Health, Royal College of General Practitioners, British Medical Association. 2011, v4, p. 174. http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/infogov/links/gpelec2011.pdf. Accessed in November 2011.

  18. Farrar K. Accountability, prescribing and hospital pharmacy in an electronic, automated age. Pharm J. 1999;263:496–501.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gray S, Smith J. Practice report – electronic prescribing in Bristol. Healthc Pharm. August 2004:20–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Foot R, Taylor L. Electronic prescribing and patient records – getting the balance right. Pharm J. 2005;274:210–2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richman C. How to get useful information out of drug reports – and save time. Clin Pharm. 2011;3:186–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pacini M, Smith RD, et al. Home-based medication review in older people: is it cost-effective? Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25:171–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. National Service Framework (NSF) for Older People. London: Department of Health; 2001. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4003066. Accessed in May 2012.

  24. Slee A, Farrar K, Hughes D, et al. Electronic prescribing – implications for hospital pharmacy. Hosp Pharm. 2007;14:217–20.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dale M, Goundrey-Smith S, Higham S, Collinson A. Reducing human error in checking concomitant medications. J Clin Res Best Pract. 2010;6:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Collin C, Davies P, Mutiboko IK, Ratcliffe S. Randomised controlled trial of cannabis-based medicine in spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2007;14(3):290–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer S, Stewart T, et al. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:139–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Formea CM, Picha AF, et al. Enhancing participant safety through electronically generated medication order sets in a clinical research environment: a medical informatics initiative. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3:312–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Seroussi B, Bouaud J. Using oncodoc as a computer-based eligability screening system to improve accrual onto breast cancer clinical trials. Artif Intell Med. 2003;29:153–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Morris K, Safdar A, et al. Make reflection part of your daily practice. Clin Pharm. 2010;2:397.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:523–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goundrey-Smith, S. (2012). Electronic Medicines Management: Support for Professional Practice. In: Principles of Electronic Prescribing. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4045-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4045-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4044-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4045-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics