Skip to main content

Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Norm-Parameterized Fuzzy Description Logics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

The Semantic Web is an evolving extension of the World Wide Web in which the semantics of the available information are formally described, making it more machine-interpretable. The current W3C standard for SemanticWeb ontology languages, OWL, is based on the knowledge representation formalism of Description Logics (DLs). Although standard DLs provide considerable expressive power, they cannot express various kinds of imprecise or vague knowledge and thus cannot deal with uncertainty, an intrinsic feature of the real world and our knowledge. To overcome this deficiency, this chapter extends a standard Description Logic to a family of norm-parameterized Fuzzy Description Logics. The syntax to represent uncertain knowledge and the semantics to interpret fuzzy concept descriptions and knowledge bases are addressed in detail. The chapter then focuses on a procedure for reasoning with knowledge bases in the proposed Fuzzy Description Logics. Finally, we prove the soundness, completeness, and termination of the reasoning procedure

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Sattler, U.: An overview of tableau algorithms for description logic. Studia Logica 69(1), 5–40 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–44 (2001). URL http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?vid=1&hid=102&sid=40d1a318-d0ac-41c6-9854-0ffde44a63eb%40sessionmgr109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bobillo, F., Straccia, U.: A fuzzy description logic with product t-norm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (Fuzz IEEE-07), pp. 652C–657. IEEE Computer Society (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brachman, R.J., Levesque, H.J.: The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages. In: Proceedings AAAI-1984, pp. 34–37. AAAI Press (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haase, P., Völker, J.: Ontology learning and reasoning - dealing with uncertainty and inconsistency. In: Proceedings of Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web, pp. 45–55 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of fuzzy logic. Kluwer (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hájek, P.: Making fuzzy description logics more expressive. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 154(1), 1–15 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hájek, P.: What does mathematical fuzzy logic offer to description logic?, pp. 91–100. Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web, Capturing Intelligence. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hajek, P.: Fuzzy logic. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Standford University (2009). URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2009/entries/logic-fuzzy/

  11. Hollunder, B.: An alternative proof method for possibilistic logic and its application to terminological logics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 12(2), 85–109 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks, I.: Optimising tableaux decision procedures for description logics (1997). ANNOTE: AKA: Horrocks97b

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. J. of Web Semantics 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical reasoning for very expressive description logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL 8(3), 239–264 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsueh-Ieng, P.: Uncertainty management for description logic-based ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, University of Concordia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaeger, M.: Probabilistic reasoning in terminological logics. In: Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR94), pp. 305–316 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Koller, D., Levy, A., Pfeffer, A.: P-classic: A tractable probabilistic description logic. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97), pp. 390–397 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laskey, K.J., Laskey, K.B., Costa, P.C.G., Kokar, M.M., Martin, T., Lukasiewicz, T.: W3c incubator group report. Tech. Rep. http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/wiki/DraftFinalReport, W3C (05 March, 2008)

  19. Lukasiewicz, T.: Expressive probabilistic description logics. Artificial Intelligence 172(6/7), 852–883 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin-Recuerda, F., Robertson, D.: Discovery and uncertainty in semantic web services. In: Proceedings of Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web, p. 188 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McGuinness, D.L., van Harmelen, F.: Owl web ontology language overview (2004). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/

  22. Montagna, F., Marini, C., Simi, G.: Product logic and probabilistic ulam games. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 158(6), 639–651 (2007). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2006.11.007

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Fokoue, A., Lutz, C.: Owl 2 web ontology language profiles (2009). URL http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Reasoning_in_OWL_2_RL_and_RDF_Graphs_using_Rules

  24. Novák, V., Perfilieva, I., Mockor, J.: Mathematical principles of fuzzy logic. Dodrecht: Kluwer Academic (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sánchez, D., Tettamanzi, A.G.: Fuzzy quantification in fuzzy description logics, pp. 135–160. Fuzzy Logic and the Semantic Web, Capturing Intelligence. Elsevier (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Spencer, B.: ALCAS: An ALC Reasoner for CAS. http://www.cs.unb.ca/ bspencer/cs6795swt/alcas.prolog (2006). URL http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bspencer/cs6795swt/alcas.prolog

  27. Stamou, G., van Ossenbruggen, J., Pan, J.Z., Schreiber, G.: Multimedia annotations on the semantic web. IEEE MultiMedia 13, 86–90 (2006). DOI http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MMUL.2006.15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stevens, R., Aranguren, M.E., Wolstencroft, K., Sattlera, U., Drummond, N., Horridge, M., Rectora, A.: Using owl to model biological knowledge. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 65(7), 583–594 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stoilos, G., Stamou, G., Pan, J.Z., Tzouvaras, V., Horrocks, I.: Reasoning with very expressive fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30, 273–320 (2007)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Straccia, U.: Reasoning within fuzzy description logics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 137–166 (2001)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Straccia, U.: Towards a fuzzy description logic for the semantic web (preliminary report). In: 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-05), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 167–181. Springer Verlag (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tresp, C.B., Molitor, R.: A description logic for vague knowledge. In: Proc. of the 13th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’98), pp. 361–365 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yen, J.: Generalizing term subsumption languages to fuzzy logic. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’91), pp. 472–477 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao, J.: Uncertainty and Rule Extensions to Description Logics and Semantic Web Ontologies, chap. 1, p. 22. Advances in Semantic Computing. Technomathematics Research Foundation (2010). Accepted

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao, J., Boley, H.: A Reasoning Procedure for the Fuzzy Description Logic fALCHIN. In: Proc. Second Canadian Semantic Web Working Symposium, Kelowna, pp. 46–59 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao, J., Boley, H., Du,W.: Knowledge Representation and Consistency Checking in a Norm-Parameterized Fuzzy Description Logic. In: D.S. Huang, K.H. Jo, H.H. Lee, H.J. Kang, V. Bevilacqua (eds.) ICIC (2), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5755, pp. 111–123. Springer (2009). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04020-7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jidi Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer US

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, J., Boley, H. (2010). Knowledge Representation and Reasoning in Norm-Parameterized Fuzzy Description Logics. In: Du, W., Ensan, F. (eds) Canadian Semantic Web. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7335-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7335-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-7334-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-7335-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics