Abstract
From the chlorine gas attacks of World War I through the biological threats of the Cold War to the present day, defense against chemical and biological (CB) weapons has been a part of the US national security strategy. While advances in defensive technology have clearly improved, some capabilities have not changed markedly in nearly 20 years and a few that have changed very little in 60 years or more. The last decade, however, has brought an intersection of two key drivers that require a completely new way to look at CB defense and the challenges of CB proliferation. The first, the changing nature of the threat to the USA and its allies began with the fall of the Soviet Union and was magnified greatly by the events of September 11, 2001. Second is the shifting nature of technological progress that brings entirely new capabilities, many of which are no longer the exclusive domain of the USA. These drivers – ranging from the depth of biological research in the former Soviet Union to the rise of asymmetric attacks – offer new opportunities and new challenges for CB defense.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes and References
Krulak CC (1999) The strategic corporal: Leadership in the three block war. Marine Magazine. http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/usmc/strategic_corporal.htm Accessed 30 June 2008.
Office of the Director of National Defense (2007) Unclassified key judgments of the national intelligence estimate, prospects for Iraq’s stability: A challenging road ahead. http://www.dni.gov. Accessed 30 June 2008
National Research Council (2006) Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences. National Academies Press, Washington DC.
Within this text, the dual-use and the dual-use conundrum refers to the fact that almost all the equipment and materials needed to develop dangerous or offensive agents, particularly biological and chemical agents, have legitimate uses in a wide range of scientific research and industrial activity, including defensive military uses. Within this text, it does not refer to the demarcation between civilian and military uses.
5. National Research Council (2004) Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. National Academies Press. http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309089778/html/. Accessed 30 June 2008
Chiarelli PW, Smith SM (2007) Learning from our modern wars: The imperatives of preparing for a dangerous future. Mil. Rev. 2–15
Dana Priest “Archive of Al Qaeda Videotapes Broadcast; Dogs Shown Dying from Toxic Vapor,” The Washington Post, 21 August 2002, p. A13.
Report to the president (unclassified) (2005) Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction. http://www.wmd.gov/report/index.html. Accessed 30 June 2008
US Senate Report on Pre-War Intelligence on Iraq (2006) Select Committee on Intelligence. http://intelligence.senate.gov/phaseiiaccuracy.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Tucker JB (2000) Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons. MIT Press, Cambridge.
Department of Defense Directive 3000.05 (2005) Military Support for Stability, Security, Transition and Reconstruction (SSTR) Operations. Issued on 28 November.
US Army Field Manual (2006) Insurgency FM 3–24. http://usacac.army.mil/CAC/Repository/Materials/COIN-FM 3-24.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Joint publication 3-05: Doctrine for joint special operations (2003) http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new_pubs/jp3_05.pdf Joint Chiefs of Staff. Accessed 30 June 2008.
Kelley RE (2000) US Army special forces unconventional warfare doctrine: Engine of change or relic of the past?. U.S. Naval War College. http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA378713 Accessed 30 June 2008.
Metz S and Millen R (2004) Insurgency and counterinsurgency in the 21st century: Reconceptualizing threat & response. Strategic Studies Institute. http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB586.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Ucko D (2008) Innovation or inertia: The U.S. military and the learning of counterinsurgency. Orb. 52:2.
Rennstich JK (2008) The making of a digital world: The evolution of technological change and how it shaped our world. Palgrave MacMillan, New York.
National security and threat of climate change. CNA (2007) http://securityandclimate.cna.org/report/SecurityandClimate_Final.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2008.
Mapping the global future: Report of the national intelligence council’s 2020 project NIC 2004-13. Government Printing Office # 041-015-00240-6 (2004). http://www.foia.cia.gov/2020/2020.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2008.
Josh Wolfe “Decoding Future Nanotech Investment Success,” Forbes/Wolfe Nanotech Report, 10 October 2002.
National Research Council (2006) A Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
Feynman R (1959) There’s plenty of room at the bottom: An invitation to enter a new field of physics. Zyvex. http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html Accessed 30 June 2008.
Drexler KE (1981) Molecular engineering: An approach to time development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 78:5275–5278.
Purcell EM (1977) Life at low Reynolds number. Am. J. Phys. 45:3–11.
National Research Council (2006) A Matter of Size: Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Washington, DC., National Academies Press.
Zhang S (2003) Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat. Biotech. 21:1171–1178. http://web.mit.edu/lms/www/PDFpapers/Zhang_NatureBio78D70.pdf Accessed June 30 2008.
European Union (2004) Towards a European strategy for nanotechnology. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nano_com_en_new.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Government of Japan (2001) Japan 2nd S&T Plan (2001–2005). http://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/basic/2nd-BasicPlan_01–05.html Accessed 30 June 2008.
Bai C (2005) Ascent of nanoscience in China. Science. 309: 61–63. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5731/61 Accessed June 30 2008.
Appelbaum RP, Gereffi G, Parker R et al (2006) From cheap labor to high-tech leadership: Will China’s investment in nanotechnology pay off?. Constituting Globalization: Actors, Arenas, and Outcomes. http://www.cggc.duke.edu/pdfs/workshop/Appelbaum%20et%20al_SASE%202006_China%20nanotech_27%20June%2006.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Hariharan K (2005) Governments lead the charge for nano’s development in Asia. Small Times.http://www.smalltimes.com/articles/article_display. cfm?Section=ARCHI&C=RD&ARTICLE_ID=270161&p=109 Accessed 30 June 2008.
Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative (http://www.nano.ir/, English language site: http://nano.ir/en/), Islamic Republic News Agency “President Calls for Setting up of National Nanotechnology Organ” 15 July 2006 (http://www.irna.ir/en/news/view/menu-236/0607158657171656.htm).
Nanotechnology Policy Studies Committee, Available at http://www.tco.ac.ir/nano/
RIA Novosti (2007) Putin vows to bankroll nanotechnology, stresses payoff. http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070418/63882148.html Accessed 30 June 2008.
Associate Press (2007) Russia to invest over US$1 billion in nanotechnology in next three years. International Herald Tribune. http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/04/18/technology/EU-TEC-Russia-Nanotechnology.php Accessed 30 June 2008.
Reuters (2007) Putin promotes nanotechnology in Russia. http://www.javno.com/en/economy/clanak.php?id=36370 Accessed 30 June 2008.
“Nanotechnology and Global Security,” (Palo Alto, CA; Fourth Foresight Conference on Molecular Nanotechnology), 9 November 1995.
Howard S (2002) Nanotechnology and mass destruction: The need for an inner space treaty. Disarm. Dipl. 65.
Altmann J (2004) Military uses of nanotechnology: Perspectives and concerns. Secur. Dialogue 35:61–79.
Pardo-Guerra, Pablo J, Aguayo AF (2005) Nanotechnology and the international regime on chemical and biological weapons. Nanotechnology, Law & Business 2:1.
Break-out group discussion on the potential for misuses of nanotechnology, held at the Workshop on Ethical Aspects of Nanotechnology, January 11–12, 2007, Arizona State University, Tempe.
Raffensberger C and Tickner J (eds.) (1999) Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Island Press, Washington, DC. The precautionary principle states that if the results of a research program might cause severe or irreversible harm to the public, in the absence of a scientific consensus that harm would not ensue, the burden of proof falls on those who advocate undertaking the research.
National Research Council (2004) Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. National Academies Press. http://fermat.nap.edu/books/0309089778/html/ Accessed 30 June 2008.
National Research Council (2006) Globalization, Biosecurity, and the Future of the Life Sciences. National Academies Press, Washington DC.
Petro JB, Plasse TR, and Mcnulty JA (2003) Biotechnology: Impact on biological warfare and biodefense. Biosecur. Bioterror.: Biodef. Strat., Pract. Sci. 1–3:161–168.
Central Intelligence Agency (2003) The darker bioweapons future. http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/bw1103.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Lind WS, Nightengale K, Schmitt JF et al (1989) The changing face of war: Into the fourth generation. Marine Corps Gazette.
Colonel Barry Lowe, USA “A Warfighter’s Perspective on Possible Nanotechnology Applications for CBRNE/WMD Operations,” Commander Michael Penny, USN “Military Operator’s View for Marine Chemical and Biological Incident Response Force (CBIRF),” and Major General John Doesburg, USA (ret), “Bridging Science and Military Operations,” 30 January 2007, Nanotechnology for Chemical and Biological Defense 2030 Workshop, Santa Fe NM.
The Minerals Metals, & Materials Society (2004) The journal talks with the U.S. Department of Defense’s John H Hopps Jr. http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0404/Hopps-0404.html Accessed 30 June 2008.
Bush V (1945) Science: The endless frontier. United States Government Printing Office. http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm Accessed 30 June 2008.
McKitrick J, Blackwell J, Littlepage F et al (1995) The revolution in military affairs. In: Schneider BR, Grinter LE (eds.) Battlefield of the Future: 21st Century Warfare Issues. Air University Press, Maxwell AFB.
Cohen EA (1996) A revolution in warfare. Foreign Aff. 75: 41.
Hammes TX, “Fourth Generation Warfare Evolves, Fifth Emerges,” Milit. Rev., May–June 2007, http://usacac.army.mil/CAC/milreview/English/MayJun07/Hammes.pdf Accessed June 30, 2008.
Defense Science Board 2006 Summer Study on 21St Century Technology Vectors, February 2007, 4 volumes (http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2006-02-Summer_Study_Strategic_Tech_Vectors_Vol_I_Web.pdf and http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/2006-02-Summer_Study_Strategic_Tech_Vectors_Vol_II_Web.pdf). Accessed June 30 2008.
US Department of Defense (2006) Quadrennial Defense Review Report. http://www.defenselink.mil/qdr/report/Report20060203.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Committee on the Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century (2007) Rise above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press. http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463 Accessed 30 June 2008.
Peterson JL and Egan DM (2002) Small security: Nanotechnology and future defense. Def. Horiz. 8: 1–6.
Ratner D and Ratner M (2003) Nanotechnology and homeland security. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River.
The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Research and Development Leading to a Revolution in Technology and Industry, Supplement to the President’s FY 2007 Budget, http://www.nano.gov/NNI_07Budget.pdf
National Nanotechnology Initiative: Research and Development Leading to a Revolution in Technology and Industry Supplement to the President’s FY08 Budget, August 2007, http://nano.gov/NNI_08Budget.pdf
Department of Peace Studies of the University of Bradford (2008) The biological and toxin weapons convention website. http://www.opbw.org/ Accessed 30 June 2008.
OPCW (2008) Organisation for the prohibition of chemical weapons. http://www.opcw.org/ Accessed 30 June 2008.
The White House (2006) The National Security Strategy. http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006 Accessed 30 June 2008.
The White House (2002) The National Security Strategy of the United States. http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss5.html Accessed 30 June 2008.
The White House (2004) Biodefense for the 21st Century. http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/20040430.html Accessed 30 June 2008.
The White House (2002) National Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/12/WMDStrategy.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Joint Chiefs of Staff (2004) The National Military Strategy of the United States of America. http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar2005/d20050318nms.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Joint Chiefs of Staff (2006) National Military Strategy to Combat Weapons of Mass Destruction. http://www.defenselink.mil/pdf/NMS-CWMD2006.pdf Accessed 30 June 2008.
Department of Defense (2006) Quadrennial Defense Review Report. http://www.defenselink.mil/qdr/ Accessed 30 June 2008.
The National Strategy for Homeland Security (2002) http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/book/ Accessed 30 June 2008.
Department of Homeland Security (2004) Securing our homeland. http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/strategicplan Accessed 30 June 2008.
Government Printing Office (2008) Budget of the United States Government. http://origin.www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/ Accessed 30 June 2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kosal, M. (2009). Framing the Opportunities and the Challenges. In: Nanotechnology for Chemical and Biological Defense. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0062-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0062-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-0061-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4419-0062-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)