Skip to main content

Effect of Confinement: Polygons in Strips, Slabs and Rectangles

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 775))

In this chapter we will be considering the effect of confining polygons to lie in a bounded geometry. This has already been briefly discussed in Chapters 2 and 3, but here we give many more results. The simplest, non-trivial case is that of SAP on the two-dimensional square lattice Z2, confined between two parallel lines, say x = 0 and x = w. This problem is essentially 1-dimensional, and as such is in principle solvable. As we shall show, the solution becomes increasingly unwieldy as the distance w between the parallel lines increases. Stepping up a dimension to the situation in which polygons in the simple-cubic lattice Z3 are confined between two parallel planes, that is essentially a two-dimensional problem, and as such is not amenable to exact solution.

Self-avoiding walks in slits were first treated theoretically by Daoud and de Gennes [4] in 1977, and numerically by Wall et al. [14] the same year. Wall et al. studied SAW on Z2, in particular the mean-square end-to-end distance. For a slit of width one they obtained exact results, and also obtained asymptotic results for a slit of width two. Around the same time, Wall and co-workers [13, 15] used Monte Carlo methods to study the width dependence of the growth constant for walks confined to strips of width w. In 1980 Klein [9] calculated the behaviour of SAW and SAP confined to strips in Z2 of width up to six, based on a transfer matrix formulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alm S E and Janson S, (1990) Random self-avoiding walks on one dimensional lattices Com-mun Statist-Stochastic Models, 6 (2), 189–212

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez J, Janse van Rensburg E J, Soteros E G and Whittington, S G (2008) Self avoiding polygons and walks in slits J. Phys A: Math. Gen, 41

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bousquet-Mélou, M, Guttmann, A J and Jensen, I, (2005) Self-avoiding walks crossing a square J. Phys A: Math. Gen, 38 9159–9181.

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Daoud, M and de Gennes P G (1977) Statistics of macromolecular solutions trapped in small pores J. de Physique 38 85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. deGennes P G (1979) Scaling concepts in Polymer Physics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Di Marzio E A and Rubin R J (1971) Adsorption of a chain polymer between two plates J. Chem. Phys, 55 4318–36.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammersley J M and Whittington S G (1985) Self-avoiding walks in wedges J. Phys A: Math. Gen, 18 101–11

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Janse van Rensburg E J, Orlandini E and Whittington, S G (2006) Self-avoiding walks in a slab: rigorous results J. Phys A: Math. Gen, 39 13869–13902.

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein, D (1980) Asymptotic distributions for self-avoiding walks constrained to strips, cylin ders and tubes J. Stat. Phys 23 561–86.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin, R, Orlandini E, Owczarek A L, Rechnitzer A and Whittington, S G Exact enumera tions and Monte Carlo results for self avoiding walks in a slab, (2007) J. Phys A: Math. Gen, 40 7509–21.

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Soteros C E and Whittington S G (1988) Polygons and stars in a slit geometry J. Phys A: Math. Gen, 21 L857–861.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Stilck J F and Machado K D Tension of polymers in a strip (1998) Eur. Phys. J. B 5 899–904.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wall, F T, Mandel, F and Chin J C (1976) Self-avoiding random walks subject to external spatial constraints J. Chem. Phys, 65 2231–2234.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wall, F T, Seitz W A and Chin J C (1977) Self-avoiding walks subject to boundary constraints J. Chem. Phys, 67 434–8.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wall, F T, Seitz W A Chin J C and deGennes P G (1978) Statistics of self-avoiding walks confined to strips and capillaries Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci 75 no 5 2069–70.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Canopus Academic Publishing Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guttmann, A.J., Jensen, I. (2009). Effect of Confinement: Polygons in Strips, Slabs and Rectangles. In: Guttman, A.J. (eds) Polygons, Polyominoes and Polycubes. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 775. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9927-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics