John Rawls’s theory of justice is an attempt to reconcile calculated self-interest with basic rights. In order to define generally consensual principles of justice, in his A Theory of Justice (1971) Rawls goes back to classical theories of the social contract. He makes reference to Locke and, most particularly, to Rousseau and Kant but not to Hobbes, whose sovereignty theory he rejects.2. However, Rawls is concerned not with the question of how to legitimize power but with how to shape a state in accordance with the principle of justice. The leitmotif of his theory is justice as fairness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mathis, K., Shannon, D. (2009). John Rawls’s Theory of Justice. In: Efficiency Instead of Justice?. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 84. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9798-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9798-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9797-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9798-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)