Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarianism can be commended for its orientation to human needs and its equal treatment of every person, rich or poor. Under a system of wealth maximization, this is different: the utility of the rich is privileged. Moreover, the same objection must be raised to wealth maximization as to utilitarianism: the individual as such is not taken seriously, a flaw which is brought into particular focus by the question of basic rights and the problem of distributive justice. This impelled John Rawls to develop his two principles of justice. According to the first, the liberty principle, every individual must be endowed with basic rights. In the second, the difference principle, he offers a distribution criterion which is intended to prevent unduly large income disparities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mathis, K., Shannon, D. (2009). Conclusions. In: Efficiency Instead of Justice?. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 84. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9798-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9798-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9797-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9798-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)