Abstract
Physical chemistry courses are often considered among the most difficult ones – if not the most difficult – by chemistry students. The reasons may be traced to their specific requirements, from the extensive familiarity with mathematics and its descriptive role in physical sciences to the expansion of logical thinking into abstract thinking (as an essential tool for the construction and understanding of models) and to the conceptual demands of models and procedures. The difficulties experienced by students increase considerably in contexts that are disadvantaged because of the aftermaths of historical reasons. In these contexts, the combined and mutually enhancing impacts of factors like inadequate background preparation, inadequate or poor mastering of the language that is the medium of instruction and, often, also inadequate visualisation abilities, make students’ progress through physical chemistry courses comparatively more arduous. These contexts pose greater challenges for the design of viable teaching strategies. On the other hand, the usefulness of the designed strategies extends beyond the contexts for which they were generated, because their specific objective of facilitating students’ approach to concepts and techniques, when such approach is particularly arduous, makes them generally viable.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Mammino L. (2008). Teaching chemistry with and without external representations in professional environments with limited resources. In Gilbert J.K., Reiner M. and Nakhlekh M. (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 155–185.
Harre R. (1970). The Principles of Scientific Thinking. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Case S.M. (1968). The language barrier in science teaching. Teacher Education in New Countries, 9(1), 15–26.
Zepp R.A. (1981). Relationships between mathematics achievements and various English language proficiencies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 59–70.
Zepp R.A. (1982). Bilinguals’ understanding of logical connectives in English and Sesotho. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 13, 205–221.
Brodie K. (1989). Learning mathematics in a second language. Educational Review 41 (1), 39–53.
Chipere N. (1993). Dependence and the transition from high school to university in Zimbabwe. Society for Research in High Education International News, 19, 4–7.
Nangu N.C. (1994). How can we be expected to learn science in English? Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Proceedings.
Nyapfeme K. and Letseka M. (1995). Problems of learning among first year students in South African Universities. South African Journal of High Education, 9(1), 159–167.
Mammino L. (1998). Science students and the language problem: suggestions for a systematic approach. Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 189–209.
Seepe S. (2000). A pedagogical justification for mother tongue instruction. In Seepe S. and Dowling D. (Eds.), The Language of Science. Johannesburg: Vyvlia Publishers, 40–51.
Mammino L. (2000). Studying the Details of the Transition from the Mother Tongue to the Second Language, In Seepe S. and Dowling D. (Eds.), The Language of Science. Johannesburg: Vyvlia Publishers, 94–101.
Rubanza Y.I. (2002). Competition through English. The Failure of Tanzania’s Language Policy. In Prah K.K. (Ed.), Rehabilitating African Languages, CASAS Book series No 18, 39–51.
Mammino L. (2006). Terminology in Science and Technology – An Overview Through History and Options. Thohoyandou: Ditlou Publishers.
Prah K.K. (1993). Mother Tongue for Scientific and Technological Development in Africa. German Foundation for International Development. Education, Science and Documentation Centre, Bonn.
Prah K.K. (1995). African Languages for the Mass Education of Africans. German Foundation for International Development. Education, Science and Documentation Centre, Bonn.
Prah K.K. (1998). The missing link in African education and development. In Prah K.K. (Ed.), Between Distinction and Extinction. Johannesburg: Witswatersrand University Press, 1–16.
Prah K.K. (2002). The Rehabilitation of African Languages. In Prah K.K. (Ed.), Rehabilitating African Languages, CASAS Book series No 18, 1–6.
Mammino L. (2004). L’impatto, sull’apprendimento della chimica, dell’uso di una lingua diversa da quella materna. Il pensiero Chimico e la Formazione Scientifica nelle Riforme della Scuola, Assisi (Italy), December 2004.
Prah K.K. (2008). The Language of Instruction Conundrum in Africa. Meeting on The Implications of Language for Peace and Development (IMPLAN). University of Oslo, May 2008.
Love A., Mammino L. (1997). Using the Analysis of Errors to Improve Students’ Expression in the Sciences, Zimbabwe Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 1–17.
Mammino L. (2005). Language-related difficulties in science learning. I. Motivations and approaches for a systematic study. Journal of Educational Studies, 4(1), 36–41.
Mammino L. (2006). Language-related difficulties in science learning. II. The sound-concept correspondence in a second language. Journal of Educational Studies, 5(2), 189–213.
Mammino L. (2004). Dominancia del concepto de reacción, y de los terminos asociados, en las percepciones de alumnos de quimica. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Quiacute;mica XVIII, 46–52.
Mammino L. (2007). Language-related difficulties in science learning. III. Selection and combination of individual words. Journal of Educational Studies, 6(2), 199–214.
Mammino L. (2002). La percepción de la distinción entre sistemas y procesos por parte de los alumnos de quimica. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Quimica, XV, 125–129.
Mammino L. (Submitted manuscript). Language-related difficulties in science learning. IV. The use of prepositions and the expression of related functions.
Mammino L. (2002). Actitud hacia números y valores en cursos de quimica general. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Quimica, XVI, 5–10.
Mammino L. (2001). Physical quantities and their changes. Difficulties and perceptions by chemistry students. SAARMSTE (Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education) Journal, 5, 29–40.
Mammino L. (2000). General y particular en química. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química, XIV, 25–28.
Mammino L. (2005). Cause and effect – a relationship whose nature involves conceptual understanding, scientific method, logic and language. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química, XXI, 33–37.
Mammino L. (1997). Estudio de la forma en que los alumnos perciben la distinción y las mutuas relaciones entre el mundo micróscopico y el mundo macróscopico. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química, 9(2), 178–189.
Mammino L., Cardellini L. (2005). Studying students’ understanding of the interplay between the microscopic and the macroscopic descriptions in chemistry. Baltic Journal of Science Education 1(7), 51–62.
Lijnse P.L., Licht P., Vos W. & Waarlo A.J. (1990). Relating Macroscopic Phenomena to Microscopic Particles. A Central Problem in Secondary Science Education. Utrecht: CD-β Press.
Mammino L. (2005). Method-related aspects in an introductory theoretical chemistry course. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 729, 39–45.
Mammino L., Kabanda M.M. (2006). Semiempirical methods as introduction to computational chemistry. 18th International Conference on Chemical Education. Seoul (Korea), August 2006.
Gilbert J.K. (2008). Visualization: An emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In Gilbert J.K., Reiner M., Nakhleh M. (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer, 3–24.
Gabel D.L., Samuel K.V., Hunn D. (1987). Understanding the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Chemical Education 64(8), 695–697.
Gabel D.L. (1993). Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding. Journal of Chemical Education 70(3), 193–194.
Mammino L. (1999). Semplificazione nella presentazione dei concetti: necessità ed esigenze. Edichem’99: Chemistry in the Perspective of the New Century. Bari, 341–356.
Brewer I.M. (1985). Learning More and Teaching Less. Guildford, Surrey: SRHE & NFER-Nelson.
Forman E.A., Cazden C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian frameworks in education: the cognitive value of peer interaction. In Wertsch J.V. (Ed.), Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 323–347.
Mammino L. (1998). Enseñanza interactiva en cursos de Quimica teórica. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química, XI, 275–278.
Mammino L. (2005). The use of questions in the chemistry classroom: an interaction instrument with maieutic nature. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química, XXI, 241–245.
Cooper M.M. (1993). Writing/an approach for large enrolment chemistry courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(6), 476–477.
Beall H., Trimbur J. (1993). Writing as a tool for teaching chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(1), 148–149.
Castro E.A. (1995). Escribir sobre quimica para aprender quimica. Panamerican Newsletters, 8(4), 8–9.
Mammino L. (1995). Teaching/learning theoretical chemistry at undergraduate level. Southern Africa Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 2(1&2), 69–88.
Mammino L. (2002). Integrating chemistry teaching and language teaching. 17th International Conference on Chemical Education. Beijing, August 2002.
Bradley J.D., Brand M., Gerrans G.C. (1987). Excellence and the accurate use of language, symbols and representations in chemistry. In Widening the Scope of Chemistry, IUPAC Blackwell Scientific Publications.
Mammino L. (1995). Algunas reflexiones sobre el rigor conceptual y formal en la enseñanza de la química. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química, 8(2), 375–384.
Mammino L. (1998). Precision in wording: a tool to facilitate the understanding of Chemistry. CHEMEDA, the Australian Journal of Chemical Education, 48 & 49 & 50, 30–38.
Mammino L. (2000). Rigour as a pedagogical tool. In Seepe S. and Dowling D. (Eds.), The Language of Science. Johannesburg: Vyvlia Publishers, 52–71.
Mammino L. (1995). Il linguaggio e la scienza. Torino: Societá Editrice Internazionale.
Mammino L. (2000). Educating towards the Language of Science. In Seepe S. and Dowling D. (Eds.), The Language of Science. Johannesburg: Vyvlia Publishers, 72–93.
Mammino L. (1998). Evidenciación de estructuras lógicas en la enseñanza de la química teórica. XXIV International Conference of Theoretical Chemists of Latin Expression, Puebla (Mexico), September 1998.
Mammino L. (1997). La matematica come strumento di descrizione. Nuova Secondaria, 10, 94–95.
Mammino L. (2000). Making mathematics student-friendly in theoretical chemistry courses. 16th International Conference on Chemical Education. Budapest, August 2000.
Mammino L. (2002). Mathematics in Chemistry: a Challenge for Tertiary Level Chemical Education. 17th International Conference on Chemical Education. Beijing August 2002.
Mammino L. (2000). Alternative Conceptions and Misconceptions about the Phases of Matter. SAARMSE Conference 2000. Port Elizabeth (South Africa), January 2000.
Mammino L. (2007). Chemistry Students’ perceptions of the Factors Influencing Phase Transitions of Pure Substances, as Expressed in Laboratory Reports. Anuario Latinoamericano de Educación Química XXIII, 41–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mammino, L. (2009). Teaching Physical Chemistry in Disadvantaged Contexts: Challenges, Strategies and Responses. In: Gupta-Bhowon, M., Jhaumeer-Laulloo, S., Li Kam Wah, H., Ramasami, P. (eds) Chemistry Education in the ICT Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9732-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9732-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-9731-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-9732-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)