Skip to main content

Assessing Sustainability: The Missing Elements in Current Environmental Assessment Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environment and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Managing an Emerging Crisis

Abstract

Assessing the impact of industrial activity is a complex challenge for policy makers, scientists and engineers. In an effort to evaluate industrial systems, a range of alternative methods have been developed. From qualitative matrix models to data-intensive computer models, decision-makers are able to choose from a variety of tools to appraise the potential environmental impact. However, these methods stop short at demonstrating how industrial activity affects sustainability. The purpose of this work is to advance the area of environmental assessment by developing a method of evaluating the sustainability implications of industrial activity (products and processes). This chapter covers the definition of sustainability, its key factors and elements, the state of the art for environmental assessment and the shortcomings of the current environmental assessment methods. This research agenda was carved out of a survey of research needs within environmental assessment and industrial ecology. From this study, it is evident that assessing sustainability requires a cross-disciplinary study of factors and interactions linking demography, consumer demand, economic activity, industrial activity and resource use to sustainability. Further, a key component of assessing sustainability is population. As such, this chapter serves as an introduction to the development of the “Population Based Model for Assessing the Sustainability Implications of Industrial Activity” (PMASI). This approach is relevant to both developing and industrialized countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, F.. et al. (2002). Chapter 2: Risk Concepts, Green Engineering: Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Process, (eds.) D. Allen and D. Shonnard. Prentice-Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkel, R.V. (2000). “The Sustainable Development Challenge for Technology: Will It Work in Time?”, Australia at the Crossroads: Scenarios and Strategies for the Future, Perth, Australia, April 30–May 2, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chertow, M. (2001). “The IPAT Equation and Its Variants: Changing Views of Technology and Environmental Impact”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 4, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, C. (2004). “Sustainable Development: Mainstream and Critical Perspectives”, Organization and Environment, vol. 17, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W. (1986). Carrying capacity and the limits to freedom. XI World Congress of Society, New Delhi, India, 18 August 1986. Paper prepared for Social Ecology Session 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSD: Commission on Sustainable Development (2001). CSD Theme Indicator Framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargan, T. (2006). “Population Based Model for Assessing the Sustainability Implications of Industrial Processes and Products”, Dissertation, Florida A& M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargan, T., and Owusu, Y. (2003). “Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing for Sustainable Development: An Industrial Engineering Perspective”, National Technical Association, September 9–13, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, J.L. (2001). “Sustainable Development: Business as Usual or a New Way of Living” in Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues, 9th edition, (ed.) T.D. Goldfarb. McGraw_Hill/Dushkin: Guilford, CT, pp. 294–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T.E. (2003). Greening the Service Industries. The Service Industries Journal, 23(5): 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T.E., and Allenby, B.R. (2nd ed.) (2003). Industrial Ecology. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, T.E. Allenby, B.R., and Comrie, P.R. (1995). “Matrix Approach to Abridged Life Cycle Assessment”, Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosselot, K., and Allen, David (2002). “Chapter 13: Life Cycle Concepts, Product Stewardship and Green Engineering”, Green Engineering: Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes, (eds.) D.T. Allen and D.R. Shonnard. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 419–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowledge, L., Barton, R., Bradley, K., Fava, J., Ligge, C., and Young, S. (1999). Mapping the Journey: Case Studies in Strategy and Action Toward Sustainable Development. Greenleaf Publishing: Sheffield, UK, p. 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruwaard, J.M., et al. (1995). “Interactions Between Operations Research and Environmental Management”. European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 85, pp. 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, P.C., Frosch, R.A., and Risser, P.G. (1996). Engineering with Ecological Constraints. National Academy Press: Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • WECD. (1987). Our Common Future: World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2003). World Development Report 2003: Sustainable Development in a Dynamic World. http://www.worldbank.org. Accessed 20 June 2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarsha N. Eason (Dargan) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eason (Dargan), T.N., Owusu, Y.A., Chapman, H. (2009). Assessing Sustainability: The Missing Elements in Current Environmental Assessment Approaches. In: Luginaah, I.N., Yanful, E.K. (eds) Environment and Health in Sub-Saharan Africa: Managing an Emerging Crisis. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9382-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics