Skip to main content

Development of a Model of Formative Assessment

  • Conference paper

Abstract

This chapter describes the formulation of a model of formative assessment as it has emerged through a series of collaborative research and development activities with teachers. The aspiration is to articulate our emerging understanding of a complex set of interacting factors in an integrated and coherent manner. Though necessarily tentative, the model will serve to guide our future research activities as well as offering a perspective on the research of others. A specific approach to conceptual change is at the heart of the model, which attempts to extrapolate from constructivism as a theory of learning to its applications to the practice of teaching. Our approach integrates domain-specific elements – hypothesised conceptual trajectories that re-occur in science learning – with domain-general elements. The latter describe recurring cycles of interaction between teachers and pupils that might occur in any curricular domain. Some of the cost-benefits to teachers in their approach to the implementation of formative assessment practices are discussed. It is suggested that an implication of the suggested approach is the need to conduct and share more empirical research into pupils’ conceptual development, nationally and internationally

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, R. (2004). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. (Second edition. Cambridge: Dialogos)

    Google Scholar 

  • AAAS (2001). Atlas of scientific literacy. Project 2061. (American Association for the Advancement of Science. National Science Teachers’ Association, Co-publisher)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. J. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: Principles, policy and practice. (Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 7–74)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. J. & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. (In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage)

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. J., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). The nature and value of formative assessment for learning. (American Education Research Association. Chicago, April 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruer, J. T. (1996). Classroom problems, school culture, and cognitive research. (In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (p. 290). Cambridge, MA: MIT press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Guesne, F. & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. (Milton Keynes: Open University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. (2003). Assessment of inquiry. (In J. M. Atkins & J. Coffey (Eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 41–60). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A. & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flutter, J. & Ruddock, J. (2004). Consulting pupils: What’s in it for schools? (London: Routledge Falmer)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, K. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. (Cambridge, MA: MIT press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. (2005). The BEAR assessment system: A brief summary for the classroom context. Retrieved October 3, 2006, from http://bearcenter.berkeley.edu/publications/pubs.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B. (1974). Wait time and rewards as instructional variables, their influence on language, logic and fate control. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11, 81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Primo, M. & Furtak, E. M. (2004). Informal formative assessment of students’ understanding of scientific enquiry. (Centre for the Study of Evaluation (CSE) Report 639)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., McGuigan, L. & Hughes, A. (1998). Forces. Science process and exploration research reports. (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T., McGuigan, L., Roberts, D. & Hughes, A. (2001). Science optional assessment materials for KS1, 2 and 3. (ACCAC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. & McGuigan, L. (2002). Promoting understanding through representational redescription: an illustration referring to young pupils’ ideas about gravity. (In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tslfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society (pp. 61–68). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. & McGuigan, L. (2003). Assessing progress in science KS1, 2 and 3. (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. & McGuigan, L. (2005). Assessing progress in science INSET Toolkit KS1, 2 and 3. (Qualifications and Curriculum Authority)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiberghien, A. (2000). Designing teaching situations in secondary school. (In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: the contribution of research. (pp. 27–47). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C. & Black, P. J. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on school achievement. Assessment in education: principles, policy and practice, 11(1), 49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. & Sloane, K. (2000). From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education, 13 (2), 181–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Russell, T., McGuigan, L. (2007). Development of a Model of Formative Assessment. In: Pintó, R., Couso, D. (eds) Contributions from Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5032-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics