Abstract
This article discusses government regulation and the consequent compliance costs for the private sector from the perspective of transaction cost economics. In many cases, government regulation is shaped as legally binding standards. In order to comply with these standards, private sector firms meet various types of transaction costs, such as the bonding costs that the principal/agent relationship of government regulation brings about. On the other hand, good standards may reduce transaction costs. Therefore, optimal design of government regulation requires the design of standards with the lowest possible transaction costs. Due to network externalities and economics of scale, and in order to guarantee a level playing field, good coordination and unifying standards within the EU can be beneficial. This article provides examples of such standards.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
More generally, consumer protection is about making sure that all consumer products are safe and that consumer rights are properly protected, that consumers have the information they need to make a judgment and are not misled.
References
Akerlof, G.A., 1970, The market for “lemons”: quality, uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.
Blind, K., 2004, The Economics of Standards, Edward Elgar Publishing, Williston.
Boog, J.J. and A.F.M. Nijsen, 2007, Pilotonderzoek overige nalevingskosten van bestaande wetgeving (Pilot research on other compliance costs of existing legislation) EIM, Zoetermeer, 30 March 2007.
Brunsson, N. and B. Jacobsson, 2000, A World of Standards, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Butter, F.A.G. den and R.H.J. Mosch, 2003, Trade, trust and transaction costs, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2003-082/3.
Butter, F.A.G. den and P. Corveleijn, 2007, Standaardisering van het Europese effectenverkeer (Standards for the European financial assets trade), Economisch Statistische Berichten, 92, 708–711.
Butter, F.A.G. den, S.P.T. Groot, and F. Lazrak, 2007a, Standaards als bron van welvaart (Standards as sources of prosperity), Kwartaalschrift Economie, 4, nr. 2139–165.
Butter, F.A.G. den, S.P.T. Groot, and F. Lazrak, 2007b, The transaction costs perspective on standards as a source of trade and productivity growth, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2007-090-3.
COM 689, 2006, Measuring Administrative Costs and Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union, EU Commission, Brussels.
Giovannini, The Group, 2001. Cross-Border Clearing and Settlement Arrangements in the European Union. Brussel. http://ec.europa.eu.
Goerke, L and M.J. Holler, 1998, Strategic standardization in Europe: A public choice perspective, European Journal of Law and Economics, 6, 95–112.
Hudson, C. and J. Hudson (2008) Guaranteeing Quality in the EU: Who Gains Most?, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 33, 283–298.
Jones, P. and J. Hudson, 1996, Standardization and the costs of assessing quality, European Journal of Political Economy, 12, 355–361.
Kox, H.L.M., 2005, Intra-EU differences in regulation-caused administrative burden for companies, CPB Memorandum 136, CPB, The Hague.
London Stock Exchange, 2002, Clearing and Settlement in Europe. Response to the first report of the Giovannini Group.
Mattli, W., 2001, The politics and economics of international institutional standards setting: an introduction, Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 328–344.
Mosch, R.H.J., 2004, The Economic Effects of Trust; Theory and Empirical Evidence, Tinbergen Institute Research Series 340, Thela Thesis, Amsterdam.
North, D.C., 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (MA).
North, D.C., 1994, Economic performance through time, American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.
Savage, M., 2006, Implementation of Waste Electric and Electronic Equipment Directive in EU 25, European Commission, Brussels.
Ugland, T. and F. Veggeland, 2006, Experiments in food safety policy integration in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44, 607–624.
Williamson, O.E., 1998, Transaction cost economics: how it works; where it is headed, De Economist, 146, 23–58.
World Trade Organization, 2005, World Trade Report 2005, Washington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
den Butter, F.A.G., Hudson, J. (2009). Standardization and Compliance Costs: Relevant Developments at EU Level. In: Nijsen, A., Hudson, J., Müller, C., Paridon, K., Thurik, R. (eds) Business Regulation and Public Policy. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 20. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77678-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77678-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77677-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77678-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)