This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abramson, J. (1994). We, the jury: The jury system and the ideal of democracy. New York: Basic Books.
Benton, T.R., McDonnell, S., Ross, D.F., Thomas, W.N., & Bradshaw, E. (2007). Has eyewitness research penetrated the American legal system? In R.C.L. Lindsay, D.F. Ross, J.D. Read, & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. 2: Memory for people (pp. 453–500). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bliesener, T. (2006). Lay judges in the German criminal court: Social-psychological aspects of the German criminal justice system. In M.F. Kaplan & A.M. Martin (Eds.), Understanding world jury systems through social psychological research. NewYork: Psychology Press.
Blumenthal, J.A. (2002). Law and social science in the twenty-first century. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 12, 1–53.
Bornstein, B.H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91.
Bornstein, B.H., & Greene, E. (in press). Consulting on damage awards. To appear in R.L. Wiener & B.H. Bornstein (Eds.), Handbook of trial consulting. New York: Springer.
Bornstein, B.H., & McCabe, S.G. (2005). Jurors of the absurd? The role of consequentiality in jury simulation research. Florida State University Law Review, 32, 443–467.
Diamond, S.S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulation. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571.
Diamond, S.S. (2003). Convergence and complementarity between professional judges and lay adjudicators. In P. van Koppen & S.D. Penrod (Eds.), Adversarial vs. inquisitorial justice (pp. 321–332). New York: Springer.
Galanter, M. (2004). The vanishing trial: An examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1, 459–570.
Greene, E., & Bornstein, B.H. (2000). Precious little guidance: Jury instruction on damage awards. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 743–768.
Greene, E., & Bornstein, B.H. (2003). Determining damages: The psychology of jury awards. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J.J., & Wistrich, A.J. (2001). Inside the judicial mind. Cornell Law Review, 86, 777–830.
Hans, V.P. (2006, Spring). The twenty-first century jury: Worst of times or best of times? Criminal Law Brief, 3–8.
Institute of Medicine (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Retrieved March 9, 2007 from: http://www.iom.edu/object.file/master/4/117/0.pdf.
Jonakait, R.N. (2003). The American jury system. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kalven, H. (1958). The jury, the law, and the personal injury damage award. Ohio State Law Journal, 19, 159–178.
Kalven, H. (1964). The dignity of the civil jury. Virginia Law Review, 50, 1055–1075.
Kaplan, M.F., & Martin, A.M. (2006). Understanding world jury systems through social psychological research. New York: Psychology Press.
Kerr, N.L., & Bray, R.M. (2005). Simulation, realism, and the study of the jury. In N. Brewer & K.D. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective (pp. 322–364). New York: Guilford.
Lawless, R.M., Robbennolt, J.K., & Ulen, T.S. (in press). Empirical methods in law. New York: Aspen Publishers.
Merritt, D.J., & Cihon, J. (1997). New course offerings in the upper-level curriculum: Report of an AALS survey. Journal of Legal Education, 47, 524–570.
Miller, M.K., & Bornstein, B.H. (2004). Juror stress: Causes and interventions. Thurgood Marshall Law Review, 30, 237–269.
Ogloff, J.R.P., & Finkelman, D. (1999). Psychology and law: An overview. In R. Roesch, S.D. Hart, & J.R.P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and law: The state of the discipline (pp. 1–20). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S. Ct. 1057 (2007).
Post, L. (Nov. 10, 2004). Spelling it out in plain English. National Law Journal online.
Robbennolt, J.K. (2005). Evaluating juries by comparison to judges: A benchmark for judging? Florida State University Law Review, 32, 469–509.
Robbennolt, J.K., & Studebaker, C.A. (1999). Anchoring in the courtroom: The effects of caps on punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 23,353–373.
Saks, M.J. (1989). Legal policy analysis and evaluation. American Psychologist, 44, 1110–1117.
Saks, M.J. (1992). Do we really know anything about the behavior of the tort litigation system—and why not? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 1147–1292.
Sharkey, C.M. (2003). Punitive damages as societal damages. Yale Law Journal, 113, 347–453.
Sharkey, C.M. (2005). Unintended consequences of medical malpractice damages caps. New York University Law Review, 80, 391–512.
Sheinman, H. (2003). Tort law and corrective justice. Law and Philosophy, 22, 21–73.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Campbell, 123 S. Ct. 1513 (2003).
Sunstein, C., Hastie, R., Payne, J., Schkade, D., & Viscusi, W. (2002). Punitive damages: How juries decide. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Tyler, T. R., Boeckmann, R. J., Smith, H. J., & Huo, Y. J. (1997). Social justice in a diverse society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Van Koppen, P., & Penrod, S.D. (2003). Adversarial vs. inquisitorial justice. New York: Springer.
Vidmar, N. (2000). World jury systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vidmar, N., & Hans, V. (2007). American juries: The verdict. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Press.
Wiener, R.L. (2007). Law and everyday decision making: Rational, descriptive, and normative models. In R.L. Wiener, B.H. Bornstein, R. Schopp, & S.L. Willborn (Eds.), Social consciousness in legal decision making (pp. 3–32). New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bornstein, B.H. (2008). Signs for the Future of Civil Justice Research. In: Bornstein, B.H., Wiener, R.L., Schopp, R.F., Willborn, S.L. (eds) Civil Juries and Civil Justice. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74490-2_14
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74488-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74490-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)