Skip to main content

Underachievement Syndrome: A Psychological Defensive Pattern

  • Chapter

The report entitled A Nation at Risk: The Imperative of Educational Reform was prepared by the National Commission on Excellence in Education (1983). It brought great attention to the phenomenon of underachievement among gifted children, pronouncing that fully half of gifted children do not work to their abilities in school. Unfortunately, that report did not reference any basis for the calculation of that dramatic conclusion, so the percentage of underachievers is not clear and can be calculated in many ways. Although the exact percentage is not known, most educators agree that underachievement is a major problem.

A broad definition of underachievement is a “discrepancy between children’s school performance and their abilities” (Baum, Renzulli, & Hebert, 1995; Butler-Por, 1987; Colangelo, Kerr, Christensen, & Maxey, 1993; Dowdall &Colangelo, 1982; Emerick, 1992; Kedding, 1990; Lupart &Pyryt, 1996; Richert, 1991; Rimm, 1986a, 1995; Supplee, 1990; Whitmore, 1980; Wolfe, 1991), but that broad definition only alerts one to the fact that problems exist. Not all underachievement is attributable to psychological defensive patterns, the focus of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, J. A. (1996). Everyday stressors of academically gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 356–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A. Y. (1987). I’m black, but look at me, I am also gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 180–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battle, J. (2002). Why bright kids fail: Helping the underachiever. Retrieved September 15, 2004, from http://www.about-underachieving-teens.com/why-bright-kids-fail.html.

  • Baum, S. (2004). The promise of talent development for two exceptional youngsters. Gifted Education Communicator, 34(4), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S., Owen, S. V., & Dixon, J. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled: From definitions to practical intervention strategies. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hebert, T. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Mounts, N., Lamborn, S., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting practices and peer group affiliation in adolescence. Child Development, 64, 467–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. B., & Steinberg, L. (1990). Academic achievement and social acceptance: Skirting the “brain-nerd” connection. Education Digest, 55(7), 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler-Por, N. (1987). Underachievers in school: Issues and intervention. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, D. R., & Clasen, R. E. (1995). Underachievement of highly able students and the peer society. Gifted and Talented International, 10(2), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinkenbeard, P. R. (1991). Unfair expectations: A pilot study of middle school students’ comparisons of gifted and regular classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coil, C. (2004). The hidden gifted underachiever. Gifted Education Communicator, 35(4), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students, Vols. 1 & 2. Iowa City, IA: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., & Dettmann, D. (1983). A review of research on parents and families of gifted children. Exceptional Children, 50, 20–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Christensen, P., & Maxey, J. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdall, C. B., & Colangelo, N. (1982). Underachieving gifted students: Review and implications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(4), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted black students. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Towards a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington, E. M., & Frankie, G. (1967). Effects of parental dominance, warmth, and conflict on imitation in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 199–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, J. (2006). An argument for mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003, Fall). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in the underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnes, F., & Bean, S. (Eds.). (2005). Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, F. (1986). Helping the muskrat guard his musk: A new look at underachievement. Bossier City, LA: Bossier Parish School Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedding, R. (1990). Learning preferences and skill patterns among underachieving gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinney, D. A. (1993). From nerds to normals: The recovery of identity among adolescents from middle school to high school. Sociology of Education, 66, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffoon, K. S., Jenkins-Friedman, R., & Tollefson, N. (1989). Causal attributions of underachieving gifted, achieving gifted, and nongifted students. Journal for the Educational of the Gifted, 13(1), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupart, J. L., & Pyryt, M. C. (1996). “Hidden gifted” students: Underachiever prevalence and profile. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20(1), 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1988). The psychology of underachievement. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, H. P., & Marcus, S. I. (1995). Could do better: Why children underachieve and what can be done about it. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2001). Why try? Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high achieving gifted students (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED454678).

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussen, P. H., & Rutherford, E. (1963). Parent-child relations and parental personality in relation to young children’s sex-role preferences. Child Development, 34, 589–607.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olszewski, P., Kulieke, M., & Buescher, T. (1987). The influence of the family environment on the development of talent: A literature review. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. S., & Colangelo, N. (1996). Gifted achievers and underachievers: A comparison of patterns found in school files. Journal of Counseling and Development. Retrieved on July 14, 2006, from http://www.geniusdenied.com/articles/Record.aspx?NavID=13_0&rid=12299.

  • Reis, S. M. (1998, Spring). Underachievement for some, dropping out with dignity for others. ITAG News, Iowa Talented and Gifted Association Newsletter, 23(4), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2002). Underachievement in gifted students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon (Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children (pp. 81–91). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Underachievement in gifted and talented students with special needs. Storrs: University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikovich, J. M., & Purcell, J. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say? Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L., White, A., Callahan, C., & Hartman, R. (2001). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students (rev. ed.). Manual and nine rating scales. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, S. (2005, Fall/Winter). The irony of “twice-exceptional”. California Association for the Gifted, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richert, E. S. (1991). Patterns of underachievement among gifted students. In M. Bireley & J. Genshaft (Eds.), Understanding the gifted adolescent: Educational, developmental, and multicultural issues (pp. 139–162). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1986a). Underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures. Watertown, WI: Apple Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1986b). AIM: Achievement identification measure. Watertown, WI: Educational Assessment Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1987). GAIM: Group achievement identification measure. Watertown, WI: Educational Assessment Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1988). AIM-TO: Achievement identification measure—teacher observation. Watertown, WI: Educational Assessment Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. B. (1990). How to parent so children will learn. Watertown, WI: Apple Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1994). Rimm’s parenting for achievement: Six-hour training course, including gifted module. Watertown, WI: Apple Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1995). Why bright kids get poor grades and what you can do about it. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1996). How to parent so children will learn (2nd ed.). New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (2003). See Jane win ® for girls: A smart girl’s guide to success. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (2005). Growing up too fast: The Rimm report on the secret world of America’s middle schoolers. Rodale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., Cornale, M., Manos, R., & Behrend, J. (1989). Guidebook—underachievement syndrome: Causes and cures. Watertown, WI: Apple Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. B., & Lovance, K. J. (1992). The use of subject and grade skipping for the prevention and reversal of underachievement. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., & Lowe, B. (1988). Family environments of underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2001). How Jane won: 55 successful women share how they grew from ordinary girls to extraordinary women. New York: Crown Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S., Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Rimm, I. (1999). See Jane win ®: The Rimm report on how 1, 000 girls became successful women. New York: Crown Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (1986). Brave new directions: Needed research on the labeling of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. (1989). Gifted: The two-faced label. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(1), 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R. (2000). Flirting with underachievement: Hidden for a reason. Highly Gifted Children, 13(2), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1981). Modeling and attributional effects on children’s achievement: A self-efficacy analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1984). Self-efficacy perspective on achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 19, 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). What you can do to reverse underachievement in your classroom. The Davidson Institute for Talent Development. Retrieved from www.http:// geniusdenied.com.

  • Siegle, D., Reis, S., McCoach, D. B., Mann, R., Green, M., & Schreiber, F. (2002). Intervention strategies for improving academic achievement [CD]. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Smutny, J. (2004). Creative underachievers…are they creative too? Gifted Education Communicator, 35(4), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spock, B. (1994). A better world for our children. Bethesda, MD: National Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supplee, P. L. (1990). Reaching the gifted underachiever. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (2004). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C., Kaplan, S., Renzulli, J., Purcell, J., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usdansky, M. (1994, August 30). More kids live in changing families. USA Today, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). What matters in curriculum for gifted learners: Reflections on theory, research, and practice. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 174–183). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2008). Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students. National Association for Gifted Children (Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). Human motivation (2nd ed.). New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, J. R. (1980). Giftedness, conflict, and underachievement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winebrenner, S. (2001). Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom: Strategies and techniques every teacher can use to meet the academic needs of the gifted and talented. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. A. (1991). Underachieving gifted males: Are we missing the boat? Roeper Review, 13(4), 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rimm, S. (2008). Underachievement Syndrome: A Psychological Defensive Pattern. In: Pfeiffer, S.I. (eds) Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics