Skip to main content

Work Disability: It is not just the “lesion”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Work and Cancer Survivors

I used to be an orthopedic surgeon. When I was an undergraduate medical student, I was fascinated by the brain, as it looked to me the most mysterious part of the body and I registered for my first rotation in neurosurgery at a famous neurological hospital in Paris. Unfortunately at this time, neurosurgery was far less advanced than now and most patients had severe trauma or advanced tumors. The wards were filled with comatose patients and in the Operating Room, the concussed brain was suctioned ... My next rotation was orthopedic surgery. I found the fundamentals and action of rebuilding what was sick and broken, leading to functional recovery very appealing. The spine combines bones and nerves in a complex interesting way and I became a spine surgeon. Twenty years and many spine fusions later, I had accumulated excellent fusion rates with splendid X-Rays. Alas, I followed up with many patients who were experiencing pain as before or worse, were disabled, and unable to return to work. Many of these patients were even crying at follow up due to their distress. I progressively realized that the book chapters and clinical papers that I was reading and applying in practice might not always tell the truth or the whole story regarding the treatment of spinal osteoarthritis or other sources of “mechanical spinal pain.” Also, filling Workers Compensation Board (WCB) or other insurance forms out for patients, I realized that the more I fused, the more the disability was being created in the forensic attribution of compensation, as every new fusion was considered to add disability instead of improving the patient’s status. Some colleagues having obviously similar results were telling me that many patients were just “too lazy to return to work” and happy to combine surgery with benefits. I could not accept that. I could not accept that my “successful surgical procedure” led to overall failures in the lives of my patients. One day, the dean of my School of Medicine asked me: Dr. Loisel, your colleagues, the neurosurgeons, tell me that they send you patients with failures of disc surgery and that you refuse to operate on them. Why? I answered: because, most of the time, I know now that I cause more harm than good: I cure the lesion but I increase the disability. My colleagues as well will recognize this in ten years from now. I was committed to provide the proof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Sprangers M. Return to work of cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study into the quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2003;60(5):352–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spitzer WO, LeBlanc FE, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine. 1987;12(7 Suppl):S1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nachemson A. Work for all. For those with low back pain as well. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 1983(179):77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, et al. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine. 1997;22(24):2911–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Feuerstein M. A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 1991;1(1):5–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schultz IZ, Stowell AW, Feuerstein M, Gatchel RJ. Models of return to work for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of occupational rehabilitation. 2007 Jun;17(2):327–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thomas CS. Psychological consequences of traumatic injury. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;180:392–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, et al. Disability prevention – New paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Disease Management & Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Limoges J, Lemaire R, Dodier F. Trouver son travail. Montréal: Éditions Fides 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Watson Wyatt. Staying@Work: Making the connection to a healthy organization. Report: Watson Wyatt Worldwide; 2005. Report No.: W-806.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Institut de la statistique du Québec. Enquête social et de santé 1998. 2nd ed. Sainte-Foy, Québec: Les Publications du Québec 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Waddell G, Burton AK, Main CJ. Screening to identify people at risk of long-term incapacity for work. London UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: Description of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coderre TJ, Katz J, Vaccarino AL, Melzack R. Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence. Pain. 1993;52(3):259–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995;62(3):363–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fordyce WE. Back pain in the workplace. Management of disability in non-specific conditions. Seattle: IASP Press 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feuerstein M, Huang GD, Ortiz JM, Shaw WS, Miller VI, Wood PM. Integrated case management for work-related upper-extremity disorders: Impact of patient satisfaction on health and work status. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003;45(8):803–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Waddell G, Main C. A new clinical model of low back pain and disability. In: Waddell G, ed. The back pain revolution. Toronto: Churchill Livingstone 1998:223–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist. 1992;47(9):1102–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, Keller R, Scheel I, van Tulder M, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: The challenge of implementing evidence. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2005;15(4):507–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D, et al. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope if we can just get all the players onside. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1998;158(12):1625–31.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 1998;8(2):113–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Feuerstein M, Callan-Harris S, Hickey P, Dyer D, Armbruster W, Carosella AM. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. Long-term effects. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1993;35(4):396–403.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand MJ, Champagne F, Stock S, et al. Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six-year follow up study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2002;59:807–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Funk M. Mental health policies and programs in the workplace. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbière M. Work and mental health: Learning from Return-to-Work Rehabilitation Programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders. The International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 2007;30:444–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mittag O, Kolenda KD, Nordman KJ, Bernien J, Maurischat C. Return to work after myocardial infarction/coronary artery bypass grafting: patients’ and physicians’ initial viewpoints and outcome 12 months later. Social Science & Medicine. 2001;52(9):1441–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nachreiner NM, Dagher RK, McGovern PM, Baker BA, Alexander BH, Gerberich SG. Successful return to work for cancer survivors. AAOHN Journal. 2007;55(7):290–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Coutu M, Durand M, Loisel P, Goulet C, Gauthier N. Level of distress among workers undergoing work rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2007;17(2):289–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Feuerstein M. Defining cancer survivorship. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 2007;1(1):5–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Taskila T. Cancer survivors at work. Work-related problems and factors associated with their employment, work ability and social support from the work community. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian cancer statistics 2008. 2008 cited; Available from: http://www.cancer.ca/vgn/images/portal/cit_86751114/10/34/614137951cw_library_WYNTK_Bladder_Punjabi2005.pdf

  35. Feuerstein M. Cancer Survivorship and Work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2005;15(1):1–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Loisel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loisel, P. (2009). Work Disability: It is not just the “lesion”. In: Work and Cancer Survivors. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72041-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72041-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72040-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72041-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics