Skip to main content

Critical Issues in Theory for Health Promotion

  • Chapter
Book cover Health and Modernity

Abstract

There are, of course, in the pursuit of science, all the classical reasons that stress the importance of theory. These will not be elaborated here because many do not apply to a field of work such as health promotion. Theory is probably most needed in order to help set the parameters for a scientific discipline, rather than a field of activity such as health promotion. Nonetheless theory serves a critical role in the conduct of most any activity and health promotion is no exception. Most critically, theory helps one avoid two types of error, one a narrow empiricism that concerns itself only with observation and the undirected collection of data and two an outlandish unanchored abstract thought that tries to address the entire range of understanding of the meaning of life. Health promotion practice is full of interventions, particularly at the community level, that are not anchored in any systematic theoretical approach. At the same time large conceptual ideas that are discussed in health promotion are equally found wanting an underlying theory. Finally theory anchors explanations in a field in the rich contextual efforts of many others who have thought long and hard about why social life is the way it is. A prime example is the discipline of sociology where a theoretical tradition has provided a rich source of explanation for phenomena ranging from socioeconomic status to globalization. To date there is no equivalent to this rich tradition in the field of health promotion. We have to create it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Achinstein, P. (1968). Concepts of Science: A Philosphical Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Achinstein, P. (2004). The book of evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, M., Layne, N., & Moreau, J. (1994). Can life expectancies be used to determine if health promotion works? American Journal of Health Promotion, 8, 449–461.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, K., & Rootman, I. (1996). Scientific rigor and community participation in health promotion research: Are they compatible? Health Promotion International, 11, 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, B. (1992). Understanding the present: Science and the soul of modern man. New York and London: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science (2nd ed.). New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. (1996). In praise of intolerance to charlatanism in academia. In P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, and M. W. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason (pp. 96–115). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catford. (2004). Health promotion's record card: How principled are we 20 years on? Health Promotion International, 19, 1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CDC, Internet site for the Community Guide: http://www.health.gov/communityguide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, K., & McQueen, D. V. (1996). Theory in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehring, D. (1997). Causation and persistence: A theory of causation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EWG, European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. (1998). Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policymakers. Pamphlet, WHO (EURO), Health Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. R., Levitt, N., & Lewis, M. W. (Eds.). (1997). The flight from science and reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences (distributed by The John's Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrickson, L., & McKelvy, B. (2002). Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7280–7295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUHPE. (1999). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: A report for the European Commission by the International Union for Health Promotion and Education, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels–Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUHPE. (2003). The New Public Health: A collection of video conversation with people who shape our thinking about health and health care (www.iuhpe.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jammer, M. (1999). Concepts of force (2nd ed.). Mineola, New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirscht, J. (1974). Research related to the modification of health beliefs. Health Education Monographs, 2, 455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G., et al. (1996). Evidence for success in health promotion: Suggestions for improvement. In D. Leathar (Ed.), Health education research: Theory and practice, 11, 367–376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1989a). Thoughts on the ideological origins of health promotion. Health Promotion International, 4, 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1989b). Changing the public health, Edited by Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change (chaps. 1 and 2, pp. 1–28). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1989c). Schools of Public Health in den USA—Erfahrungen und Zukunftsperpektiven. In B. Badura, T. Elkeles, B. Grieger, & W. Kammerer Zukunftsaufgabe Gesundheitsfoerderung, Landesverband der Betriebskrankenkassen in Berlin, Berlin, pp. 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1990). Comprehensive approaches to health research. In Evelyne de Leeuw, Chris Breemer ter Stege, & Gaspard A de Jong (Eds.), Research for Healthy Cities, Proceedings of the International Conference on Research for Healthy Cities. Supplement TSG 11/90, The Hague, pp. 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1991). The contribution of health promotion research to public health. European Journal of Public Health, 1, 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1994). Health promotion in Canada: A European/British perspective with an emphasis on research. In A. P. Pederson, M. O'Neill, & I. Rootman (Eds.), Health promotion in Canada: Provincial, national and international perspectives (pp. 335–347). Toronto: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1996). The search for theory in health behaviour and health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (1998). Theory or cosmology: The basis for health promotion theory. In W. E. Thurston (Ed.), Doing health promotion research: The science of action (chap. 3, pp. 29–40). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2000). Perspectives on health promotion: theory, evidence, practice and the emergence of complexity. Health Promotion International, 15, 95–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2001a). Sociology in public health. In Lester Breslow, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public health (pp. 1132–1134). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2001b). Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 16, 261–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2002a). The evidence debate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 83–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V. (2002b). Social and behavioral sciences. In Lester Breslow, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public health (pp. 1111–1116). New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen, D. V., & Anderson, L. (2001). What counts as evidence: Issues and debates. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. V. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett, & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives (pp. 63–81). Denmark: World Health Organization. (chap. 4, pp. 63–833). Reprinted in Debates and dilemmas in promoting health: A reader (2nd. ed.). In M. Sidell et al. (Ed.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. M. (1986). The nature and correlates of health behavior. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Health and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D. (1998). Evaluating health promotion—progress, problems, and solutions. Health Promotion International, 13, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poland, B. (1996). Knowledge development and evaluation in, of and for healthy community initiatives. Part I: guiding principles. Health Promotion International, 11, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., McQueen, D., et al. (Eds.). (2000). There is a shortage of evidence regarding the effectiveness of health promotion. Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives (chap. 24). Copenhagen: WHO (EURO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, L., Manor, O., & Englehard, D. (2006). In defense of the RCT for health promotion research. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2, 328–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D., et al. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 150, 1249–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAJPM, Supplement to American Journal of Preventive Medicine. (2000). Introducing the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Methods, first recommendations and expert commentary. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, R. (1957). The nature and status of medical sociology. American Sociological Review, 22, 200–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tones, K. (1997). Beyond the randomized controlled trial: A case for A Judicial Review. Health Education Research, 12, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, J. (1995). The beak of the finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization, European Regional Office. (1984). Health promotion: A discussion document on the concepts and principles. Copenhagen: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization, European Regional Office. (1998). Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policymakers. World Health Assembly (1998) Resolution WHA 51.12 on Health Promotion. Agenda Item 20, 16 May 1998. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McQueen, D.V. (2007). Critical Issues in Theory for Health Promotion. In: Health and Modernity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37759-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37759-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-37757-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-37759-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics