Abstract
There are, of course, in the pursuit of science, all the classical reasons that stress the importance of theory. These will not be elaborated here because many do not apply to a field of work such as health promotion. Theory is probably most needed in order to help set the parameters for a scientific discipline, rather than a field of activity such as health promotion. Nonetheless theory serves a critical role in the conduct of most any activity and health promotion is no exception. Most critically, theory helps one avoid two types of error, one a narrow empiricism that concerns itself only with observation and the undirected collection of data and two an outlandish unanchored abstract thought that tries to address the entire range of understanding of the meaning of life. Health promotion practice is full of interventions, particularly at the community level, that are not anchored in any systematic theoretical approach. At the same time large conceptual ideas that are discussed in health promotion are equally found wanting an underlying theory. Finally theory anchors explanations in a field in the rich contextual efforts of many others who have thought long and hard about why social life is the way it is. A prime example is the discipline of sociology where a theoretical tradition has provided a rich source of explanation for phenomena ranging from socioeconomic status to globalization. To date there is no equivalent to this rich tradition in the field of health promotion. We have to create it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Achinstein, P. (1968). Concepts of Science: A Philosphical Analysis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Achinstein, P. (2004). The book of evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adrian, M., Layne, N., & Moreau, J. (1994). Can life expectancies be used to determine if health promotion works? American Journal of Health Promotion, 8, 449–461.
Allison, K., & Rootman, I. (1996). Scientific rigor and community participation in health promotion research: Are they compatible? Health Promotion International, 11, 333–340.
Appleyard, B. (1992). Understanding the present: Science and the soul of modern man. New York and London: Doubleday.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science (2nd ed.). New York: Verso.
Bloor, D. (1991). Knowledge and social imagery (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bunge, M. (1996). In praise of intolerance to charlatanism in academia. In P. R. Gross, N. Levitt, and M. W. Lewis (Eds.), The flight from science and reason (pp. 96–115). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Catford. (2004). Health promotion's record card: How principled are we 20 years on? Health Promotion International, 19, 1–6.
CDC, Internet site for the Community Guide: http://www.health.gov/communityguide.
Dean, K., & McQueen, D. V. (1996). Theory in health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 7–9.
Ehring, D. (1997). Causation and persistence: A theory of causation. New York: Oxford University Press.
EWG, European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation. (1998). Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policymakers. Pamphlet, WHO (EURO), Health Canada, Ottawa.
Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of western sociology. New York: Basic Books.
Gross, P. R., Levitt, N., & Lewis, M. W. (Eds.). (1997). The flight from science and reason. New York: New York Academy of Sciences (distributed by The John's Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London).
Henrickson, L., & McKelvy, B. (2002). Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 7280–7295.
IUHPE. (1999). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: A report for the European Commission by the International Union for Health Promotion and Education, ECSC-EC-EAEC, Brussels–Luxembourg.
IUHPE. (2003). The New Public Health: A collection of video conversation with people who shape our thinking about health and health care (www.iuhpe.org).
Jammer, M. (1999). Concepts of force (2nd ed.). Mineola, New York: Dover.
Kirscht, J. (1974). Research related to the modification of health beliefs. Health Education Monographs, 2, 455–469.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 107–123.
MacDonald, G., et al. (1996). Evidence for success in health promotion: Suggestions for improvement. In D. Leathar (Ed.), Health education research: Theory and practice, 11, 367–376.
McQueen, D. V. (1989a). Thoughts on the ideological origins of health promotion. Health Promotion International, 4, 339–342.
McQueen, D. V. (1989b). Changing the public health, Edited by Research Unit in Health and Behavioural Change (chaps. 1 and 2, pp. 1–28). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
McQueen, D. V. (1989c). Schools of Public Health in den USA—Erfahrungen und Zukunftsperpektiven. In B. Badura, T. Elkeles, B. Grieger, & W. Kammerer Zukunftsaufgabe Gesundheitsfoerderung, Landesverband der Betriebskrankenkassen in Berlin, Berlin, pp. 231–249.
McQueen, D. V. (1990). Comprehensive approaches to health research. In Evelyne de Leeuw, Chris Breemer ter Stege, & Gaspard A de Jong (Eds.), Research for Healthy Cities, Proceedings of the International Conference on Research for Healthy Cities. Supplement TSG 11/90, The Hague, pp. 52–58.
McQueen, D. V. (1991). The contribution of health promotion research to public health. European Journal of Public Health, 1, 22–28.
McQueen, D. V. (1994). Health promotion in Canada: A European/British perspective with an emphasis on research. In A. P. Pederson, M. O'Neill, & I. Rootman (Eds.), Health promotion in Canada: Provincial, national and international perspectives (pp. 335–347). Toronto: W.B. Saunders.
McQueen, D. V. (1996). The search for theory in health behaviour and health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11, 27–32.
McQueen, D. V. (1998). Theory or cosmology: The basis for health promotion theory. In W. E. Thurston (Ed.), Doing health promotion research: The science of action (chap. 3, pp. 29–40). Calgary, Alberta, Canada: University of Calgary Press.
McQueen, D. V. (2000). Perspectives on health promotion: theory, evidence, practice and the emergence of complexity. Health Promotion International, 15, 95–7.
McQueen, D. V. (2001a). Sociology in public health. In Lester Breslow, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public health (pp. 1132–1134). New York: MacMillan.
McQueen, D. V. (2001b). Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promotion International, 16, 261–268.
McQueen, D. V. (2002a). The evidence debate. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 83–4.
McQueen, D. V. (2002b). Social and behavioral sciences. In Lester Breslow, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of public health (pp. 1111–1116). New York: MacMillan.
McQueen, D. V., & Anderson, L. (2001). What counts as evidence: Issues and debates. In I. Rootman, M. Goodstadt, B. Hyndman, D. V. McQueen, L. Potvin, J. Springett, & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives (pp. 63–81). Denmark: World Health Organization. (chap. 4, pp. 63–833). Reprinted in Debates and dilemmas in promoting health: A reader (2nd. ed.). In M. Sidell et al. (Ed.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2002.
Norman, R. M. (1986). The nature and correlates of health behavior. Ottawa, Canada: Department of Health and Welfare.
Nutbeam, D. (1998). Evaluating health promotion—progress, problems, and solutions. Health Promotion International, 13, 27–44.
Poland, B. (1996). Knowledge development and evaluation in, of and for healthy community initiatives. Part I: guiding principles. Health Promotion International, 11, 237–247.
Rootman, I., Goodstadt, M., McQueen, D., et al. (Eds.). (2000). There is a shortage of evidence regarding the effectiveness of health promotion. Evaluation in health promotion: Principles and perspectives (chap. 24). Copenhagen: WHO (EURO).
Rosen, L., Manor, O., & Englehard, D. (2006). In defense of the RCT for health promotion research. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 18–24.
Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2, 328–335.
Sackett, D., et al. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 150, 1249–5.
SAJPM, Supplement to American Journal of Preventive Medicine. (2000). Introducing the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Methods, first recommendations and expert commentary. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 1.
Straus, R. (1957). The nature and status of medical sociology. American Sociological Review, 22, 200–204.
Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Tones, K. (1997). Beyond the randomized controlled trial: A case for A Judicial Review. Health Education Research, 12, 1–4.
Weiner, J. (1995). The beak of the finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York: Random House.
World Health Organization, European Regional Office. (1984). Health promotion: A discussion document on the concepts and principles. Copenhagen: WHO.
World Health Organization, European Regional Office. (1998). Health promotion evaluation: Recommendations to policymakers. World Health Assembly (1998) Resolution WHA 51.12 on Health Promotion. Agenda Item 20, 16 May 1998. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McQueen, D.V. (2007). Critical Issues in Theory for Health Promotion. In: Health and Modernity. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37759-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-37759-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-37757-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-37759-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)