Skip to main content

Policy Analysis Using a Microsimulation Model of the Italian Households

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 551))

Summary

In this paper, we apply a dynamic microsimulation approach, which allows us to examine the evolution of the system as a whole and at the same time to focus our attention on the different typologies of workers and pensioners. The latter objective is achieved by simulating individual reactions to systemic changes, while taking into account the regional dimensions. This technique also enables us to perform a general micro-analysis of the effects of past reforms on family pension-income distribution and average individual pension-benefits. The analytical framework used is the dynamic microsimulation model MIND, jointly developed by the University of Parma and Pisa, that incorporates behavioural analysis of individual choices of retirement age, derived from the Stock-Wise [24] option value model. We also perform sensitivity analysis on the model. This represents a valuable technique for treating uncertainty in input variables and for testing the robustness of the simulation results to possible changes in the macroeconomic scenario. In particular, we measure the economic impact resulting from alternative values of the income growth rate and the real interest rate as well as the effect of different distributions of the education degree reached by the individuals.

MIUR financial supports are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank an anonymous referee and the participants at the workshop New Tools for Qualitative Economic Dynamics held at the CIMAT, Guanajuato - Mex (October 2002) and VII WEHIA Workshop held in Trieste (May 2002) for helpful comments and suggestions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aaron H (1966) The Social Insurance Paradox, Canadian Journal of Economics 32: 371–379

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson AB (1983) The Economics of Inequality. Clarendon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aaron H (1966) The Social Insurance Paradox, Canadian Journal of Economics 32: 371–379

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banca d’Italia (1997) I bilanci delle famiglie italiane nell’anno 1995. Supplemento al bollettino statistico 14, Banca d’Italia Roma

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bianchi C, Romanelli M, Vagliasindi P (2001) Inequality and poverty among pensioners: microsimulating the role of indexing lowest pensions to wages, ECOFIN Discussion Papers, Università di Parma

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bianchi C, Romanelli M, Vagliasindi P (2003) Validating a dynamic microsimulation model of the Italian households. In this volume

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cannari L, Nicoletti Altimari S (1998) A microsimulation model of the Italian household’s sector. In: Le previsioni della spesa per pensioni, ISTAT, Annuali di statistica, Serie 10, 16:103–134

    Google Scholar 

  8. Champernowne DG, Cowell FA (1998) Economic inequality and income distribution, University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Sandre P, Pinnelli A, Santini A (eds) (1999) Nuzialità e fecondità in trasformazione: percorsi e fattori del cambiamento, Il Mulino Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  10. Homer S, Sylla R (1991) A History of Interest Rate. Rutgers University Press London

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morrison R J (2000) DYNACAN, the Canada Pension Plan Policy Model: Demographics and Earnings Components. In: Gupta A, Kapur S (eds) Microsimulation in Government Policy and Forecasting, North-Holland Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neufeld C (2000) Alignment and Variance Reduction in DYNACAN. In: Gupta A, Kapur S (eds) Microsimulation in Government Policy and Forecasting, North-Holland Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shorrocks AF (1995) Revisiting the Sen poverty index. Econometrica 63:1225–1230

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Stock JH, Wise DA (1990) Pensions, the option value of work, and retirement. Econometrica 58:1151–1180

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tucci MP (1998) Stochastic Sustainability. In: Chichilninsky G, Heal J, Vercelli A (eds) Sustainability: Dynamics and Uncertainty, Dordrecth, Kluwer ed., pp. 151–169

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vagliasindi P (1999) Riforma del TFR e futuro del sistema pensionistico. ECOFIN, Discussion Paper Series, n.2, Università degli Studi di Parma

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wolf DA (2001) The role of microsimulation in longitudinal data analysis. Papers in Microsimulation Series, N6, Syracuse University, Syracuse

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bianchi, C., Romanelli, M., Vagliasindi, P.A. (2005). Policy Analysis Using a Microsimulation Model of the Italian Households. In: Leskow, J., Punzo, L.F., Anyul, M.P. (eds) New Tools of Economic Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 551. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28444-3_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics