Abstract
We describe a new knowledge acquisition tool that enabled us to develop a dialog system recommending software design patterns by asking critical questions. This assistance system is based on interviews with experts. For the interviews we adopted the repertory grid method and integrated formal concept analysis. The repertory grid method stimulates the generation of common and differentiating attributes for a given set of objects. Using formal concept analysis we can control the repertory grid procedure, minimize the required expert judgements and build an abstraction based hierarchy of design patterns, even from the judgements of different experts. Based on the acquired knowledge we semi-automatically generate a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN), that is used to conduct dialogs with users to suggest a suitable design pattern for their individual problem situation. Integrating these different methods into our knowledge acquisition tool KARaCAs enables us to support the entire knowledge acquisition and engineering process. We used KARaCAs with three design pattern experts and derived approximately 130 attributes for 23 design patterns. Using formal concept analysis we merged the three lattices and condensed them to approximately 80 common attributes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addision-Wesley, Reading (1995)
Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)
Meffert, K.: Supporting design patterns with annotations. In: 13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems (ECBS 2006), pp. 437–445 (2006)
Gomes, P.: Software design retrieval using bayesian networks and wordnet. In: Funk, P., González Calero, P.A. (eds.) ECCBR 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3155, pp. 184–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Möbus, C., Seebold, H., Garbe, H.: A greedy knowledge acquisition method for the rapid prototyping of knowledge structures. In: Clark, P., Schreiber, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 211–212. ACM Press, New York (2005)
Kelly, G.A.: Psychology of Personal Constructs. W. W. Norton, New York (1955)
Delugach, H., Lampkin, B.: Troika: Using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition. In: Stumme, G. (ed.) Working with Conceptual Structures: Contributions to ICCS 2000, pp. 201–214. Shaker, Aachen (2000)
Gaines, B., Shaw, M.: Knowledge acquisition tools based on personal construct psychology. The Knowledge Engineering Review 8(1), 49–85 (1993)
Castro-Schez, J.J., Jennings, N.R., Luo, X., Shadbolt, N.: Acquiring domain knowledge for negotiating agents: a case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61(1), 3–31 (2004)
Spangenberg, N., Wolff, K.: Datenreduktion durch die Formale Begriffsanalyse von Repertory Grids. In: Einführung in die Repertory Grid-Technik, Band 2, Klinische Forschung und Praxis, pp. 38–54. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern (1993)
Richards, D.: Ripple-down rules with formal concept analysis: A comparison to personal construct psychology. In: Gaines, B., Musen, M. (eds.) Proceedings of 11th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Banff Canada. SRDG Publications, Calgary (1998)
Choisel, S., Wickelmaier, F.: Extraction of auditory features and elicitation of attributes for the assessment of multichannel reproduced sound. In: 118th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Barcelona, Spain (2005)
Bruder, R., Lengnink, K., Prediger, S.: Ein Instrumentarium zur Erfassung subjektiver Theorien über Mathematikaufgaben. Preprint Nr. 2265 des Fachbereichs Mathematik, TU Darmstadt (2003)
Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis. Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., Stumme, G., Tane, J.: Conceptual knowledge processing with formal concept analysis and ontologies. In: Eklund, P. (ed.) ICFCA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2961, pp. 189–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Kollewe, W.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Wie Begriffsstrukturen die Pflege und Recherche in Wissensdatenbanken unterstützen. In: Bitkom KnowTech. (2002)
Düwel, S.: BASE - ein begriffsbasiertes Analyseverfahren für die Software-Entwicklung. PhD thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg (2000)
Lengnink, K., Prediger, S.: Development of the personal constructs about mathematical tasks - a qualitative study using repretory grid methodology. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), Hawaii (2003)
Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: FCA - MERGE: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In: IJCAI, pp. 225–234 (2001)
Ganter, B., Stumme, G.: Creation and merging of ontology top-levels. In: Ganter, B., de Moor, A., Lex, W. (eds.) ICCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2746, pp. 131–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Stumme, G.: Ontology merging with formal concept analysis. In: Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M., Sheth, A., Staab, S., Uschold, M. (eds.) Semantic Interoperability and Integration. Number 04391 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2005)
Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference, Revised second printing edn. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Mateo (1998)
Jensen, F.: Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Folckers, J., Möbus, C., Schröder, O., Thole, H.J.: An intelligent problem solving environment for designing explanation models and for diagnostic reasoning in probabilistic domains. In: Lesgold, A.M., Frasson, C., Gauthier, G. (eds.) ITS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1086, pp. 353–362. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Mislevy, R., Almond, R.G., Yan, D., Steinberg, L.: Bayes nets in educational assessment: Where do the numbers come from? CSE Technical Report 518, Center for the Study of Evaluation, University of California, Los Angeles (2000)
Bunt, A., Conati, C.: Assessing effective exploration in open learning environments using bayesian networks. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 698–707. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Zapata-Rivera, J., Greer, J.: Student model accuracy using inspectable bayesian student models. In: Hoppe, U., Verdejo, F., Kay, J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies, pp. 65–72. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)
Schachter, R.D.: Bayes-ball: The rational pastime (for determining irrelevance and requisite information in belief networks and influence diagrams). In: Cooper, G.F., Moral, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 1998), pp. 480–487. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Garbe, H., Janssen, C., Möbus, C., Seebold, H., de Vries, H. (2006). KARaCAs: Knowledge Acquisition with Repertory Grids and Formal Concept Analysis for Dialog System Construction. In: Staab, S., Svátek, V. (eds) Managing Knowledge in a World of Networks. EKAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11891451_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11891451_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46363-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46365-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)