Abstract
The call for a “focus on content” in ontology research by Nicola Guarino and Mark Musen in their launching statement of the journal Applied Ontology has quite some implications and ramifications. We reflectively discuss ontology engineering as a scientific discipline, and we put this into the wider perspective of debates in other fields. We claim and argue that ontology is a new scientific method for theory formation. This positioning allows for stronger concepts and techniques for theoretical, empirical and practical validation that in our view are now needed in the field. A prerequisite for this is an emphasis on ontology as a (domain) content oriented concept, rather than as primarily a computer representation notion. We propose that taking domain theories and the associated substantive or content reference of ontologies really seriously as first-class citizens, will actually increase the contribution of ontology engineering to the development of scientific method in general. Next, ontologies should develop from the current static representations of relatively stable domain content into actionable theories-in-use, and a possible way forward is to build in capabilities for dynamic self-organization of ontologies as service-oriented knowledge utilities that can be delivered over the Web.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Guarino, N., Musen, M.: Applied ontology: Focusing on content. Applied Ontology 1(1), 1–5 (2005)
Offen, R.: Domain understanding is the key to successful system development. Requirements Engineering 7, 172–175 (2002)
Gruber, T.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)
Mika, P., Akkermans, J.: Towards a new synthesis of ontology technology and knowledge management. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19(4), 317–345 (2004); DOI Online (November 11, 2005)
Akkermans, J., Baida, Z., Gordijn, J., Peña, N., Altuna, A., Laresgoiti, I.: Value webs: Using ontologies to bundle real-world services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4), 57–66 (2004)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J.: Value-based requirements engineering: Exploring innovative e-Commerce ideas. Requirements Engineering 8(2), 114–134 (2003)
Evermann, J., Wand, Y.: Ontology based object-oriented domain modelling: Fundamental concepts. Requirements Engineering 10, 146–160 (2005)
Kuhn, T.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1970)
Lakatos, I., Musgrave, A. (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)
Jammer, M.: The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1974)
Feyerabend, P.: Against Method, 3rd edn., Verso, London (1993)
Becker, H.: Tricks of the Trade — How to Think About Your Research While You’re Doing It. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1998)
Robson, C.: Real World Research, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (2002)
Bowling, A.: Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2002)
Bryman, A.: Research Methods and Organization Studies. Routledge, London (1989)
Babbie, E.: The Practice of Social Research, 8th edn. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont (1998)
Schreiber, A., Akkermans, J., Anjewierden, A., de Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., der Velde, W.V., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge Engineering And Management — The CommonKADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Wieringa, R., Maiden, N., Mead, N., Rolland, C.: Requirements engineering paper classification and evaluation criteria: A proposal and a discussion. Requirements Engineering 11(1), 102–107 (2006)
Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)
Akkermans, J., Gordijn, J.: What is this science called requirements engineering? In: Glinz, M., Lutz, R. (eds.) Proceedings 14th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE 2006). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)
Borst, W., Akkermans, J., Top, J.: Engineering ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46, 365–406 (1997)
Mika, P.: Social networks and the semantic web: The next challenge. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20(1), 80–93 (2005)
Cohen, P.: Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Miles, M., Huberman, A.: Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Ford, K., Bradshaw, J. (eds.): Knowledge Acquisition as Modeling. Wiley, New York (1993)
Feltovich, P., Ford, K., Hoffman, R. (eds.): Expertise in Context. AAAI Press / The MIT Press, Menlo Park / Cambridge (1997)
Checkland, P., Holwell, S.: Information, Systems and Information Systems — Making Sense of the Field. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester (1998)
Gordijn, J., Yu, E., Van der Raadt, B.: e-Service design using i ∗ and e 3 value modeling. IEEE Software 23(3), 26–33 (2006)
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
Ford, K., Glymour, C., Hayes, P. (eds.): Thinking About Android Epistemology. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)
Gordijn, J., Akkermans, J., van Vliet, J.: What’s in an electronic business model? In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 257–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Van Heijst, G., Schreiber, A., Wielinga, B.: Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45, 183–292 (1997)
Menzies, T.: Model-based requirements engineering. Requirements Engineering 8, 193–194 (2003)
Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958) (Updated Edition 2003)
van Eemeren, F., Grootendorst, R.: A Systematic Theory of Argumentation — The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Fisher, A.: The Logic of Real Arguments, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Yin, R.: Case Study Research — Design and Methods, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Argyris, C.: On Organizational Learning. Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge (1992)
Argyris, C.: Knowledge for Action. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1993)
Argyris, C.: Reasons and Rationalizations — The Limits to Organizational Knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004); See especially Ch. 5: Features of Scholarly Inquiry that Inhibit Double-Loop Learning and Implementable Validity
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Akkermans, H., Gordijn, J. (2006). Ontology Engineering, Scientific Method and the Research Agenda. In: Staab, S., Svátek, V. (eds) Managing Knowledge in a World of Networks. EKAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11891451_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11891451_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-46363-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46365-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)