Skip to main content

OWL: A Description Logic Based Ontology Language

(Extended Abstract)

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logic Programming (ICLP 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 3668))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Description Logics (DLs) are a family of class (concept) based knowledge representation formalisms. They are characterised by the use of various constructors to build complex concepts from simpler ones, an emphasis on the decidability of key reasoning tasks, and by the provision of sound, complete and (empirically) tractable reasoning services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Description logic framework for information integration. In: Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1998), pp. 2–13 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: On the decidability of query containment under constraints. In: Proc. of the 17th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 1998), pp. 149–158 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From \(\mathcal{SHIQ}\) and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. J. of Web Semantics 1, 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R., Noy, N., Musen, M.: The protégé OWL plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 229–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Liebig, T., Noppens, O.: Ontotrack: Combining browsing and editing with reasoning and explaining for OWL Lite ontologies. In: Proc. of the 2004 International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), pp. 229–243 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Visser, U., Stuckenschmidt, H., Schuster, G., Vögele, T.: Ontologies for geographic information processing. Computers in Geosciences (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oberle, D., Sabou, M., Richards, D.: An ontology for semantic middleware: extending daml-s beyond web-services. In: Proceedings of ODBASE 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wroe, C., Goble, C.A., Roberts, A., Greenwood, M.: A suite of DAML+OIL ontologies to describe bioinformatics web services and data. Int. J. of Cooperative Information Systems (2003), Special Issue on Bioinformatics

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical reasoning for expressive description logics. In: Ganzinger, H., McAllester, D., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 1999. LNCS, vol. 1705, pp. 161–180. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A tableaux decision procedure for \(\mathcal{SHOIQ}\). In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2005 (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baader, F., Hanschke, P.: A schema for integrating concrete domains into concept languages. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1991), pp. 452–457 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blackburn, P., Seligman, J.: Hybrid languages. J. of Logic, Language and Information 4, 251–272 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Ontology reasoning in the \(\mathcal{SHOQ}\)(D) description logic. In: Proc. of the 17th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pp. 199–204 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Nutt, W.: The complexity of concept languages. Information and Computation 134, 1–58 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Baader, F., Franconi, E., Hollunder, B., Nebel, B., Profitlich, H.J.: An empirical analysis of optimization techniques for terminological representation systems or: Making KRIS get a move on. Applied Artificial Intelligence. Special Issue on Knowledge Base Management 4, 109–132 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horrocks, I.: The FaCT system. In: de Swart, H. (ed.) TABLEAUX 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1397, pp. 307–312. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel-Schneider, P.F.: DLP system description. In: Proc. of the 1998 Description Logic Workshop (DL 1998), CEUR Electronic Workshop Proceedings, pp. 87–89 (1998), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-11/

  19. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: RACER system description. In: Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2001), pp. 701–705 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horrocks, I.: Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In: Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1998), pp. 636–647 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: Optimizing description logic subsumption. J. of Logic and Computation 9, 267–293 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Borgida, A., Franconi, E., Horrocks, I.: Explaining \(\mathcal{ALC}\) subsumption. In: Proc. of the 14th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schlobach, S., Cornet, R.: Explanation of terminological reason-ing: A preliminary report. In: Proc. of the 2003 Description Logic Workshop, DL 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Borgida, A., McGuinness, D.L.: Matching in description logics. J. of Logic and Computation 9, 411–447 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Küsters, R.: Non-Standard Inferences in Description Logics. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2100. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Brandt, S., Küsters, R., Turhan, A.Y.: Approximation and difference in description logics. In: Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), pp. 203–214 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D.: OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. J. of Web Semantics 3, 23–40 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Motik, B., Sattler, U., Studer, R.: Query answering for owl-dl with rules. J. of Web Semantics 3, 41–60 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosati, R.: On the decidability and complexity of integrating ontologies and rules. J. of Web Semantics 3, 61–73 (2005)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Eiter, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. In: Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), pp. 141–151. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horrocks, I. (2005). OWL: A Description Logic Based Ontology Language. In: Gabbrielli, M., Gupta, G. (eds) Logic Programming. ICLP 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3668. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11562931_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11562931_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29208-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31947-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics