Skip to main content

Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories of Subjective Well-Being

  • Chapter
Citation Classics from Social Indicators Research

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 26))

Abstract

This paper addresses issues of causal direction in research on subjective well-being (SWB). Previous researchers have generally assumed that such variables as domain satisfactions, social support, life events, and levels of expectation and aspiration are causes of SWB. Critics have pointed out that they could just as well be consequences (Costa and McCrae, 1980; Veenhoven, 1988). In some contexts this has been referred to as the top-down versus bottom-up controversy (Diener, 1984). The main purpose is to propose a general statistical model which holds promise of resolving this controversy. The model can be used when three or more waves of panel data are available. It is used here to assess causal direction between six domain satisfactions (marriage, work, leisure, standard of living, friendship and health) and SWB. Data are drawn from four waves of an Australian Quality of Life panel survey (1981–1987) with an initial sample size of 942.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, F. M. and Withey, S. B.: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being (Plenum, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M.: 1987, The Psychology of Happiness (Methuen, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M.: 1969, The Structure of Psychological Well-Being (Aldine, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., and Rodgers, W. R.: 1976, The Quality of American Life (Sage, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G. and McIver, J. P.: 1981, ‘Analysing models with unobserved variables’, in G. W. Bohrnstedt and E. F. Borgatta (eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues (Beverley Hills, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R.: 1980, ‘Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 668–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R.: 1984, ‘Personality as a lifelong determinant of well-being’, in C. Malatesta and C. Izard (eds.), Affective Processes in Adult Development and Agiing (Beverley Hills, Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E.: 1984, ‘Subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin 95, 542–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G.: 1964, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory (Hodder and Stoughton, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. F. and Kessler, R. C: 1982, ‘Equilibrium and identification in linear panel models’, Sociological Methods and Research 10, 435–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W., Holmstrom, E. L. and Wearing, A. J.: 1985, ‘Models of well-being and ill-being’, Social Indicators Research 17, 211–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W. and Wearing, A. J.: 1988, ‘The sense of relative superiority: central to well-being’, Social Indicators Research 20, pp. 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. W. and Wearing, A. J.: 1990, What Makes for Happiness? A Theory of Subjective Well-Being (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W.: 1983, ‘The analysis of covariance structure’, Sociological Methods and Research 11, 325–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D.: 1978, LISREL IV (International Educational Services, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A.: 1979, Correlation and Causality (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, R. C. and Greenberg, D. F.: 1981, Linear Panel Analysis (Academic Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. L. and Schooler, C: 1983, Work and Personality (Ablex, Norwood, N.J.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., and Zimowski, M.: 1982, ‘A growth curve approach to the measurement of change’, Psychological Bulletin 90, 726–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. R. and Willet, J. B.: 1985, ‘Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth’, Psychometrika 50, 203–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R.: 1984, Conditions of Happiness (Reidel, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R.: 1988, ‘The utility of happiness’, Social Indicators Research 20, 333–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Headey, B., Veenhoven, R., Weari, A. (2005). Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories of Subjective Well-Being. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Citation Classics from Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 26. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics