Abstract
The origin of today’s global environmental problems is the historic difference in property rights regimes between industrial and developing countries, the North and the South. In industrial countries resources such as forests and oil deposits are often under well defined and enforceable property rights, mostly private property regimes. In developing countries they are generally under ill-defined and weakly enforced property rights, mostly community or state property regimes but de-facto open-access regimes. Ill-defined and weakly enforced property rights lead to the over-extraction of natural resources in the South. They are exported at low prices to the North that over-consumes them. The international market amplifies the tragedy of the commons, leading to inferior solutions for the world economy. In developing countries, the conversion of natural resources regimes from community or state property regimes or common access to private property regimes faces formidable opposition due to international economic interests, or to heavy dependence of local and poor people on these resources. The weakness of property rights in inputs to production, such as timber and oil, could be compensated by assigning well defined and enforceable property rights to products or outputs. The 1997 Kyoto Protocol provides an example as it limits countries’ rights to emit carbon, a by - product of burning fossil fuels, but the atmosphere’s carbon concentration is a public good, which makes trading tricky. Similarly, trading rights to forests’ carbon sequestration services involve public goods. Markets that trade public goods require a measure of equity to ensure efficiency, a requirement different than the markets for private goods
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chichilnisky, G. (1977). Development patterns and the international order. Journal of International Affairs, 31(2), 275–304.
Chichilnisky, G. (1994). North-south trade and the global environment. American Economic Review, 84(4), 851–874.
Chichilnisky, G. (1996a). Property rights and the dyna mics of north south trade. In M. Bredahl, N. Ballenger, J. Dunmore, & T. Roe (Eds.) Agriculture, trade, and the environment: Discovering and measuring the critical linkages (pp.97–110). Colorado and Oxford: Harper Collins Publishers.
Chichilnisky, G. (1996b). Development and global finance: the case for an International Bank of Environmental Settlements (IBES). UNDP and UNESCO, Office of Development Studies, Discussion Paper No. 10, September 1996. Available at http://www.chichilnisky.com
Chichilnisky, G. (1996c). The greening of the Bretton Woods. Financial Times, January 10, 1996, p. 8. vailable at http://www.chichilnisky.com
Chichilnisky, G. (1997). What is sustainable development? Land Economics, 73(4), 467–491.
Chichilnisky, G. (1999). The Kyoto Protocol and the global carbon cycle Pegram Lectures, Brookhaven National Laboratories, available at http://www.chichilnisky.com.
Chichilnisky, G. (2000). Equity and efficiency in globa l emissions markets. In R. Reversz, P. Sands, & R. Steward (Eds.), Environmental law, the economy, and sustainable development (pp. 263–279). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chichilnisky, G. and G.M. Heal. (Eds.). (2000) Environmental markets: Equity and efficiency New York: Columbia University Press.
Dasgupta, P. & Heal, G. M. (1979). Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, S. (2000). A dynamic approach to forest regimes in developing countries. Ecological Economics, 32, 287–300.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Resources Institute (WRI). (1990). World Resources, 1990–1991. (WRI in Collaboration with the UNEP and UNDP). New York: Oxford University Press.
World Resource Institute (WRI). (1993).The 1993 information please environmental almanac. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chichilnisky, G. (2005). The Kyoto Protocol: Property Rights and Efficiency of Markets. In: Kant, S., Berry, R.A. (eds) Institutions, Sustainability, and Natural Resources. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3519-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3519-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3479-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3519-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)