Skip to main content

The ethics of consuming: community, agency, and participation in global food systems

  • Chapter
The ethics of consumption

Abstract

It is easy enough to think about preparing food, growing food, and eating food as straight-forward affairs, or mere biological necessities. However, these processes are wrapped up in social relations, personal identities, and political power. Broadly critical frameworks can help pull apart the varying dimensions in this complex and dynamic relationship in order to provide guidance for reforming our relationship to the food we consume in a more democratic and participatory direction. To that end, we explore the normative implications of the current organization of the world food system from multiple perspectives in critical theory, the philosophy of science, and political philosophy. We offer ethical and political analyses at the levels of community activism, national food policy, and global consumerist capitalism to show how an approach that sees these multiple levels as interactive can provide concrete reasons for supporting certain effective solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bordieu, P. (1984). Distinctions: a social critique of the judgment of taste. Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2011). CDC estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. Available at: www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-methods.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, K.A. (1993). Regenerative food systems: broadening the scope and agenda of sustainability. In: Allen, P. (ed.) Food for the future: conditions and contradictions of sustainability. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLind, L.B. (2011). Are local food and the local food movement taking us where we want to go? Or are we hitching our wagons to the wrong stars? Agriculture and Human Values 28: 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delind, L.B. and Howard, P.H. (2008). Safe at any scale? Food scares, food regulation, and scaled alternatives. Agriculture and Human Values 25: 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais, A.A. (2008). The power of peasants: reflections on the meanings of La Vía Campesina. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. and Isherwood, B. (1996). The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorino, D. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15: 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C.B. (2011). Review: Schanbacher, W.D.: The politics of food: the global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Journal of Agriculture and Environment Ethics 24: 545–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2003). Trade reforms and food security: conceptualizing the linkages. FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (2011). Background on the FDA food safety modernization act. Available at: www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm239907.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston, D. (2000). Between politics and science: assuring the integrity and productivity of research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2004). Agrarian dreams: the paradox of organic farming in California. University California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanein, N. (2011). Matters of scale and the politics of the food safety modernization act. Agriculture and Human Values 28(4): 577–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, W. (1999). Consolidation in the food and agriculture system. Report to the National Farmers Union. National Farmers Union, Denver, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrding, S. (2004). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: what is ‘strong objectivity? In: Harding, S. (ed.) The feminist standpoint theory reader: intellectual and political controversies. Routledge, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izberk- Bilgin, E. (2010). An interdisciplinary review of resistance to consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Consumption Markets and Culture 13(3): 299–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzma, J. and Meghani, Z. (2009). The public option. EMBO Reports 10(12): 1288–1293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyson, T.A. (2004). Civic agriculture: reconnecting farm, food, and community. Tufts University Press, Medford, MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (2009). The corporate co-opt of local. The wire. Available at: www.wirenh.com/Features/Features_general/the_corporate_coopt_of_local_200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mount, P. (2012). Growing local food: Scale and local food systems governance. Agriculture and Human Values 29(1): 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2009). A defense of food: an eater’s manifesto. Penguin Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2010). The food movement, rising. The New York Review of Books, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, M. (2011). Food rules: an eater’s manual. Penguin Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. and Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. (2007). Willingness to pay estimates of the societal costs of US food-borne illness. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(5): 1183–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanbacher, W. (2010). The politics of food: the global conflict between food security and food sovereignty. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader-Frechette, K. (1991). Risk and rationality: philosophical foundations for populist reforms. University California Press, Berkeley, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulver-Sneistrup, S., Akergaard, S. and Kristensen, D.B. (2011). The new work ethics of consumption and the paradox of mundane brand resistance. Journal of Consumer Culture 11(2): 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittman, H. (2010). Food sovereignty: reconnecting food, nature, and community. Food First Books, Oakland, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Beck .

Editor information

Helena Röcklinsberg Per Sandin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Wageningen Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beck, D., Ivanovic, M., Noll, S., Werkheiser, I. (2013). The ethics of consuming: community, agency, and participation in global food systems. In: Röcklinsberg, H., Sandin, P. (eds) The ethics of consumption. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics