Skip to main content

Dynamic (Effortful) Touch

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scholarpedia of Touch

Part of the book series: Scholarpedia ((SCHP))

Abstract

Dynamic or effortful touch is a subsystem of the haptic perceptual system (Gibson 1966). It is the most common form of touch, hardly noticed as such, and rarely studied (until recently).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amazeen, E (1997). The effects of volume on perceived heaviness by dynamic touch: With and without vision. Ecological Psychology 9: 245–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amazeen, E (1999). Perceptual independence of size and weight by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 25: 102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabe, P A (2010). Sufficiency of longitudinal moment of inertia for haptic cylinder length judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance. 36: 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2000). Rotational invariants and dynamic touch. In: M Heller (Ed.), Touch, Representation and Blindness (pp. 27–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C and Wagman, J B (2009). Mutuality in the perception of affordances and the control of movement. In: D Sternad (Ed.), Progress in Motor Control (pp. 273–292). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C; Silva, P L; Kinsella-Shaw, J M and Turvey, M T (2009). Sensory and motor challenges to muscle-based perception. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 12: 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M; Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2000). Perceptual independence of whole length, partial length, and hand position in wielding a rod. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J J (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J J (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (Original work published in 1979.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, A; Fonseca, S T; Harrison, S; Kinsella-Shaw, J M and Carello, C (2007). Comparison of dynamic (effortful) touch by hand and foot. Journal of Motor Behavior 39: 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hove, P; Riley, M A and Shockley, K (2006). Perceiving affordances of hockey sticks by dynamic touch. Ecological Psychology 18: 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D M; Silva, P L and Calvo, J (2009). An empirical formalization of the theory of direct learning: The muscle-based perception of kinetic properties. Ecological Psychology 21: 245–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, I; Beek, P J and van Dieën, J H (2002). The inertia tensor versus static moment and mass in perceiving length and heaviness of hand-wielded rods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28: 180–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, I; van de Langenberg, R and Beek, P J (2004). Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? Testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30: 346–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C F and Isenhower, R W (2011a). An information space for partial length perception in dynamic touch. Ecological Psychology 23: 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C F and Isenhower, R W (2011b). Information space is action space: Perceiving the partial lengths of rods rotated on an axle. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73: 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, C F; Arzamarski, R; Isenhower, R and Jacobs, D M (2008). Direct learning in dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34: 944–957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, C C and Cabe, P A (2003). Constancy in dynamic touch: Length perceived by dynamic touch is invariant over changes in media. Ecological Psychology 15: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palatinus, Z; Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2011). Principles of selective perception by dynamic touch extend to the body. Journal of Motor Behavior 43: 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palatinus, Z; Kelty-Stephen, D; Kinsella-Shaw, J; Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2014). Haptic intent in quiet standing affects multifractal scaling of postural fluctuations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 1808–1818.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, K; Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2004). Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveable–ness. Perception & Psychophysics 66: 731–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, P and Turvey, M T (2012). The role of haptic information in shaping coordination dynamics: Inertial frame of reference hypothesis. Human Movement Science 31: 1014–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist 51: 1134–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T and Carello, C (1995). Dynamic touch. In: W Epstein and S Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition, Vol. V. Perception of Space and Motion (pp. 401–490). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T and Carello, C (2011). Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 3123–3132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T and Fonseca, S T (2014). The medium of haptic perception: A tensegrity hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior 46: 143–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Langenberg, R; Kingma, I and Beek, P J (2006). Mechanical invariants are implicated in dynamic touch as a function of their salience in the stimulus flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32: 1093–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Langenberg, R; Kingma, I and Beek, P J (2007). Perception of limb orientation in the vertical plane depends on center of mass rather than inertial eigenvectors. Experimental Brain Research 180: 595–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Langenberg, R; Kingma, I and Beek, P J (2008). The perception of limb orientation depends on the center of mass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 34: 624–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagman, J B and Chemero, A (2014). The end of the debate over extended cognition. In: T Solymosi and J Shook (Eds.), Neuroscience, Neurophilosophy, and Pragmatism: Brains at Work in the World. New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science (pp. 105–124). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagman, J B and Shockley, K (2011). Metamers for hammer-with-ability are not metamers for poke-with-ability. Ecological Psychology 23: 76–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagman, J B; Zimmerman, C and Sorric, C (2007). Which feels heavier—a pound of lead or a pound of feathers? A potential perceptual basis of a cognitive riddle. Perception 36: 1709–1711.

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings

  • Summaries of much of the cited research and theorizing are to be found in the following articles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2000). Rotational dynamics and dynamic touch. In: M Heller (Ed.), Touch, Representation and Blindness (pp. 27–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C and Turvey, M T (2004). Physics and psychology of the muscle sense. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13,: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C and Wagman, J B (2009). Mutuality in the perception of affordances and the control of movement. In: D Sternad (Ed.), Progress in Motor Control: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (pp. 273–292). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carello, C; Silva, P L; Kinsella-Shaw, J M and Turvey, M T (2009). Sensory and motor challenges to muscle-based perception. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 12: 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T and Carello, C (1995). Dynamic touch. In: W Epstein and S Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Cognition, Vol. V. Perception of Space and Motion (pp. 401–490). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist 51: 1134–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T and Carello, C (2011). Obtaining information by dynamic (effortful) touching. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 3123–3132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turvey, M T and Fonseca, S T (2014). The medium of haptic perception: A tensegrity hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior 46: 143–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Atlantis Press and the author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carello, C., Turvey, M. (2016). Dynamic (Effortful) Touch. In: Prescott, T., Ahissar, E., Izhikevich, E. (eds) Scholarpedia of Touch. Scholarpedia. Atlantis Press, Paris. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-133-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-133-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Atlantis Press, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6239-132-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6239-133-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics