Skip to main content

The United States, ESDP and Constructive Duplication

  • Chapter
Book cover Defending Europe

Abstract

The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 triggered an outpouring of public sympathy and government solidarity toward the United States among its European allies. But the stirrings of a new transatlantic relationship were clear several months earlier, as the rancor that had accompanied the debate over a common European defense policy ebbed away. The Bush administration has taken a more positive approach than its predecessors to the EU’s attempts to develop its own military capacity. And the EU has worked to reassure that ESDP will not undercut NATO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a European perspective on Turkey and the ESDP, see Gilles Andreani, Christoph Bertram and Charles Grant, “Europe’s Military Revolution” (Centre for European Reform, March 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Congressional Budget Office, “NATO Burdensharing After Enlargement,” August 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stephan de Spigliere and Dmitri Danilov, From Decoupling to Recoupling: A New Security Relationship between Russia and Western Europe (Paris: WEU Institute for Security Studies, 1998), Chaillot Paper 31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klaus Naumann, “Europe’s Military Ambitions,” Centre for European Reform Bulletin (June/July 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alessandro Politi, Toward a European Intelligence Policy (Paris: WEU Institute for Security Studies, 1998), Chaillot Paper 34.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Charles Grant, “Intimate Relations: Can Britain Play a Leading Role in European Defense—and Keep Its Special Links with U.S. Intelligence?” Centre for European Reform Bulletin (April 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Robert Grant, “The RMA—Europe Can Keep in Step,” Occasional Paper 15 (Paris: WEU Institute for Security Studies, June 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Francois Heisbourg, Centre for European Reform Bulletin (June/July 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. and Charles Grant, “European Defense Post-Kosovo,” Centre for European Reform Working Paper, June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Rodman, “U.S. Leadership and the Reform of Western Security Institutions: NATO Enlargement and ESDP,” speech given at a German Foreign Policy Association conference, December 11, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2003 Jolyon Howorth and John T.S. Keeler

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schake, K. (2003). The United States, ESDP and Constructive Duplication. In: Howorth, J., Keeler, J.T.S. (eds) Defending Europe. Europe in Transition: The NYU European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981363_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics