Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Feminist Critique of the ‘Politics of Community’

  • Chapter
The British Growth Crisis

Abstract

This chapter critically interrogates the Coalition government’s Politics of Community (Robinson, 2008) agenda. Specifically, it looks at how the concept of The Broken Society is understood as the key hindrance to growth and prosperity and how the government proposes to solve this problem by empowering communities and local people via The Big Society. The chapter argues that this serves to legitimise both the politics of austerity and welfare retrenchment and a politics of discipline and criminalisation. By drawing on a theoretical framework inspired by the work of Loïc Waquant, this chapter highlights some of the devastating effects the Politics of Community agenda has had on the lives of women and in particular its effect on single mothers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bettio, E and Verashchagina, A. (2014) ‘Women and men in the “Great European Recession”’, in M. Karamessini and J. Rubery (eds), Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future of for Gender Equality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent, J. (2004) ‘The Desire for Community: Illusion, Confusion and Paradox’, Community Development Journal, 39, 3, 213–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2007) ‘Speech in Constituency’, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1542914/Cameron-blames-absent-fathers.html (accessed 17 January 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2011) ‘Speech on the Fight-back After Riots, 15.8.2011’, http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2011/08/society-fight-work-rights (accessed 17 January 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D. (2011a) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/8584238/David-Cameron-Dads-gift-to-me-was-his-optimism.html (accessed 15 January 2014).

  • Cameron, D. (2013) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2435723/DAVIDCAMERON-Marriage-good-Britain--thats-Im-backing-tax-break.html (accessed 15 January 2014).

  • Cantle, T. (2008) Community Cohesion: A New Framework for Race and Diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Card, C. (1996) ‘Against Marriage and Motherhood’, Hypatia, 11, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C. (2012) Feminism, Liberalism and Marriage, http://ebookbrowsee.net/feminism-liberalism-and-marriage-doc-d16304541 (accessed 14 January 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. and Newman, J. (2012) ‘The Alchemy of Austerity’, Critical Social Policy, 32, 299–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, S. (2010) ‘The Myth of Community?’ Concept, 1, 3, http://concept.lib.ed.ac.uk/index.php/Concept/article/viewFile/89/99 (accessed 22 August 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Danil, L. R. (2013) ‘Families First’: A Study into the Coalition Government’s ‘Troubled Families Programme’ in Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK, https://www.academia.edu/2762324/_Families_First_A_study_into_the_Coalition_Governments_Troubled_Families_Programme_in_Leeds_West_Yorkshire_UK (accessed 20 January 2014).

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1997) The Second Sex. London: Vintage

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorling, D. and Thomas, B. (2004) People and Places: A 2001 Census Atlas of the UK. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. (2009) Social Reproduction in the Global Crisis. Paper presented at UNRISD Conference on Social and Political Dimensions of the Global Crisis, available at http://unrisd.org/80256B3C005BD6AB/(httpAuxPages)/934F4B5486C1FA40C1257678002E09F3/$file/1–1Elson.pdf (accessed 19 May 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A. (2010) ‘The Broken Society Versus the Social Recession: How Should We Approach the Problems of a Post-crash Britain?’ in R. Grayson and J. Rutherford (eds), After the Crash: Reinventing the Left in Britain. London, Lawrence and Wishart, 2009, pp. 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, J. and Robinson, D. (2008) ‘Introduction’, in F. John and R. David (eds), Community Cohesion in Crisis? New Dimensions of Diversity and Difference. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. and Murphy, E. and Kelly, S. (2013) Deepening Neoliberalism via Austerity and ‘Reform’: The Case of Ireland. Human Geography, 6, 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy (2009) ‘Feminism, Capitalism and the Cunning of History’, New Left Review, 56, 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P. M. (2007) “Sinbin” Solutions: The Pioneer Projects for “Problem Families” and the Forgetfulness of Social Policy Research’, Critical Social Policy, 27, 2, 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2010) ‘Crime and Crime Control’, Criminology and Criminal Justice Studies, 10, 4, 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, D. and Ruberty, J. (2012) ‘The End of the UK’s Liberal Collectivist Social Model? The Implications of the Coalition Government’s Policy During the Austerity Crisis’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39, 1, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L. and Mooney, G. (2012) “Welfare Ghettos” and the “Broken Society”: Territorial Stigmatization in the Contemporary UK’, Housing, Theory and Society, 30, 1, 46–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, L., Mooney, G. and Neal, S. (2012) ‘Crisis Social Policy and the Resilience of the Concept of Community’, Critical Social Policy, 32, 3, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J. and Stephenson, M-A. (2011) ‘Unravelling Equality? A Human Rights and Equality Impact Assessment of the Public Spending Cuts on Women in Coventry’, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/chrp/projectss/humanrightsimpactassessments/cwv/report/127948_cwv-chrp_report.pdf (accessed 15 August 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband, C. and Alam, Y. (2011) Social Cohesion and Counter-Terrorism. A Policy Contradiction? Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. (1990) ‘Representations in Crisis: The Roots of Canada’s Permeable Fordism’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 23, 4, 653–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karamessini, M. (2014) ‘Introduction — Women’s Vulnerability to Recession and Austerity: A Different Crisis, a Different Context’, in M. Karamessini and J. Rubery (eds), Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future of for Gender Equality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. (2009) ‘From Broken Families to the Broken Society’, The Political Quarterly, 80, 2, 243–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, G. (2010) ‘The Political Economy of the Household: Neoliberal Restructuring, Enclosures, and Daily Life’, Review of International Political Economy, 17, 5, 889–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBaron, G. and Adrienne, R. (2010) ‘Toward a Feminist Political Economy of Capitalism and Carcerality’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 36, 1, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leviatas, R. (2012) ‘There May Be “trouble” Ahead: What We Know about those 120,000 Troubled Families’, Policy Response Series, No. 2, http://www.poverty.ac.uk/system/files/WP%20Policy%20Response%20No.3%20%20‘Trouble’%20ahead%20(Levitas%20Fina1%2021Apri12012).pdf (accessed 15 January 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. and Bennett, F. (2010) ‘The New “Champion of Progressive Ideals”? Cameron’s Conservative Party: Poverty, Family Policy and Welfare Reform’, Renewal, 18, 1/2, 84–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D. and Wilcox, P. (2013) ‘Women, Welfare and the Carceral State’, in P. Squires and J. Lea (eds), Criminalisation and Advanced Marginality. Critically Exploring the Work of Loïc Wacquant. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx Feree, M. (1999) ‘Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller Okin, S. (1989) Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazis, C. (2008) ‘The Problem with Criminalisation’, Criminal Justice Matters, 74, 4, 10–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, S. and Nixon, J. (2008) ‘Rationalising Family Intervention Projects’, in P. Squires (ed.), ASBO Nation: The Criminalisation of Nuisance. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2001) Workfare States. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2002) ‘Political Economies of Scale: Fast Policy, Interscalar Relations, and Neoliberal Workfare’, Economic Geography, 78, 3, 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrons, D. and Plomien, A. (2014) ‘Gender, Inequality and the Crisis: Toward More Equitable Development’, in M. Karamessini and J. Rubery (eds), Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future of for Gender Equality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, P. and Newman, I. (2011) Promoting Social Cohesion. Implications forPolicy and Evaluation. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (2008) ‘Community Cohesion and the Politics of Communitarianism’, in J. Flint and D. Robinson (eds), Community Cohesion in Crisis? New Dimensions of Diversity and Difference. Policy Press: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, John J. (2008) Criminalising Social Policy: Anti-Social Behaviour and Welfare in a De-Civilised Society. Willian Publishing: Portland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodger, J. (2012) “Regulation the Poor”: Observations on the “Structural Coupling” of Welfare, Criminal Justice and the Voluntary Sector in a “Big Society”, Social Policy & Administration, 46, 4, 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J. (2014) ‘From “Women and Recession” to “Women and Austerity”’, in M. Karamessini and J. Rubery (eds), Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future of for Gender Equality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J. and Rafferty, A. (2014) ‘Gender, Recession and Austerity in the UK’, in M. Karamessini and J. Rubery (eds), Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future of for Gender Equality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I. D. (2008) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3645075/Shannon-Matthews-abuse-shows-we-will-all-pay-the-price-for-broken-Britain.html (accessed 14 January 2014).

  • Smith, I. D. (2014) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-477388/IAIN-DUNCAN-SMITH-Britain-gangs-family.html#ixzz2qO5Gtjax (accessed 15 January 2014).

  • Squires, P. and Lea, J. (2013) ‘Introduction: Reading Loïc Wacquant — Opening and Overview’, in P. Squires and J. Lea (eds), Criminalisation and Advanced Marginality. Critically Exploring the Work of Loïc Wacquant. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steans, J. and Tepe, D. (2010) ‘Introduction — Social Reproduction in International Political Economy: Theoretical Insights and International, Transnational and Local Sitings’, Review of International Political Economy, 17, 5, 807–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenson, K. (2013) ‘The State, Sovereignty and Advanced Marginality in the City’, in P. Squires and J. Lea (eds), Criminalisation and Advanced Marginality. Critically Exploring the Work of Loïc Wacquant. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaaningen van, R. (ed.) (1997) Critical Criminology: Visions from Europe. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolly Toynbee (2011) ‘Comment is Free’, The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jun/20/doublethink-on-absent-fathers

  • Van Leeuwen, T. (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2008) Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009) Punishing the Poor. The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wollstonecraft, M. (1996) A Vindication of the Rights of Women. London: Constable and Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Daniela Tepe-Belfrage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sheffield, UK

    Jeremy Green (Research Fellow) & Colin Hay (Professor of Political Science) (Research Fellow) &  (Professor of Political Science)

  2. University of Kent at Canterbury, UK

    Peter Taylor-Gooby (Professor of Social Policy) (Professor of Social Policy)

Copyright information

© 2015 Daniela Tepe-Belfrage

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tepe-Belfrage, D. (2015). A Feminist Critique of the ‘Politics of Community’. In: Green, J., Hay, C., Taylor-Gooby, P. (eds) The British Growth Crisis. Building a Sustainable Political Recovery: SPERI Research & Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137441522_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation