Abstract
This essay addresses how the Internet works for scholars of Victorian literature and literary history, how we work on the Net, how the concept of networks is affecting our engagements with literary history, and how we can make the Net more effective for scholarly purposes. It channels this inquiry through a consideration of Victorian writer Eliza Meteyard, whose case demonstrates how the knowledge networks on which we increasingly draw for our research have profound implications for how that research is shaped.
N.B. Additional images associated with this chapter are housed in the digital annex at www.virtualvictorians.org .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Eliza Meteyard, Struggles For Fame (London: T. C. Newby, 1845), 367.
Ronald W. Lightbown, “Introduction,” The Life of Josiah Wedgwood (London: Cornmarket Press, 1970): n.p.
Alan Liu, “Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities?” in Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Matthew K. Gold (Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 2012): 490–509. Various, Twitter threads, 2012–14 “#pocodh” and “#transformdh,” https://twitter.com/search?q=%23pocodh&src=typd and https://twitter.com/search?q=%23transformdh&src=typd. Postcolonial Digital Humanities, last modified April 2014, accessed May 5, 2014, http://www.dhpoco.org.#TransformDH, last modified May 5, 2014, accessed May 5, 2014, www.transformDH.org.
Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis, “The Role of the Internet in Changing Knowledge Ecologies,” Arbor 737 (2009): 521. Lawrence Page, Sergey
Joanne Shattock, ed., The Cambridge Bibliography of English Literature: 1800–1900, vol. 4 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999).
Silverpen [Eliza Meteyard], “A Winter’s Tears,” The Ladies’ Companion and Monthly Magazine, vol. 19 (London: Rogerson and Tuxford): 18–23, accessed February 12, 2015, http://books.google.ca/books?id=KEYFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PP7&lpg=PP7&dq=%22The+Ladies%E2%80%99+Companin+and+Monthly+Magazine%22&source=bl&ots=YFWcbbhbkS&sig=ZnNbmbBLtl4e3K7yjPkM6Nz-j_Q&h1=en&sa=X&ei=u41eU8zaFaH62gW_lYG4Bg&ved=OCEAQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=Winter’s&f=false.
Lisa Gitelman, Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008): 143–48.
Marjorie Stone and Keith Lawson, “‘One Hot Electric Breath’: EBB’s Technology Debate with Tennyson, Systemic Digital Lags in Nineteenth-Century Literary Scholarship, and the EBB Archive,” Victorian Review 38, no. 2 (2012): 101–26.
Lynn C. Westney, “Intrinsic Value and the Permanent Record: The Preservation Conundrum,” OCLC Systems & Services 23, no. 1 (2007): 10.
Janet Todd, Feminist Literary History: A Defence (Cambridge: Polity Press / Basil Blackwell, 1988), 137.
Alison Booth, How to Make It as a Woman: Collective Biographical History from Victoria to the Present (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Margaret Ezell, Writing Women’s Literary History (Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1996).
Franco Moretti, Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for a Literary History (London and New York: Verso, 2005).
Alan Liu, The Laws of Cool: Knowledge Work and the Culture of Information (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Ed Folsom, “Database as Genre: The Epic Transformation of Archives,” Publications of The Modern Language Association of America 122 (2007): 1576.
Lev Manovich, The Language of New Media (Cambridge: MITP, 2001): 225.
Espen J. Aarseth, Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature (Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 1997).
This encoding within Extensible Markup Language (XML) embeds the intellectual principles of the project. Susan Brown, Patricia Clements, and Isobel Grundy, “Sorting Things In: Feminist Knowledge Representation and Changing Modes of Scholarly Production,” Women’s Studies International Forum 29, no. 3 (2006): 317–25.
Dorothy Mermin, Godiva’s Ride: Women of Letters in England, 1830– 1880 (Indiana: Indiana University Press, 1993), 48.
Gaye Tuchman and Nina Fortin, Edging Women Out: Victorian Novelists, Publishers, and Social Change (New Haven: Yale UP, 1989), 53–54.
Johanna Drucker, “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display,” Digital Humanities Quarterly 5, no. 1 (2011). Stephen Ramsay, Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism (Illinois: University of Illinois, 2011). Dan Cohen, “A Conversation with Data: Prospecting Victorian Words and Ideas,” Dan Cohen, last modified May 30, 2012, accessed May 5, 2014, http://www.dancohen.org/page/2/.
This shortcoming is evident in Cohen’s “prospecting,” with Frederick Gibbs, in the Google corpus to test the claims of Walter Houghton’s classic The Victorian Frame of Mind: we have to take their results largely on faith, or at least on the strength of their other evidence. They therefore characterize this and other admittedly “inchoate” experiments as complements to existing research processes and eschew any claim to quantitative analysis of the kind that the Google Culturomics group made with their ngram viewer (see Jean-Baptiste Michel, Yuan Kui Shen, Aviva Presser Aiden, Adrian Veres, Matthew K. Gray, Joseph P. Pickett, Dale Hoiberg, Dan Clancy, Peter Norvig, Jon Orwant, Steven Pinker, Martin A. Nowak, and Erez Lieberman Aiden, “Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books,” Science 331, no. 6014 (2011): 176–82).
Matthew L. Jockers, Macroanalysis: Digital Methods and Literary History (Illinois: University of Illinois, 2013), 168.
Harris notes that the corpuses on which much text-mining work typically draws are generally skewed against writing by women. Amy Earhart demonstrates that a high proportion of early DIY recovery projects aiming to recover the works of women, people of color, the working classes, and other marginalized groups have simply disappeared as digital humanities work has become more specialized and large digital humanities grants mostly go to canonical projects. Within nineteenth-century studies, Marjorie Stone and Keith Lawson note that all the high-profile single-author projects are devoted to white, male, canonical writers (save Emily Dickinson); women get represented in groups, collectivized. We need the distanced perspective of the web of relations but need also to be able to delve into the particularities of writer or text to probe the complexities buried in larger patterns. Amy E. Earhart, “Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon,” Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Matthew K. Gold (2012): 309–18. Katherine D. Harris, “Big Data, DH, Gender: Silence in the Archives?” triproftri, last modified March 3, 2012, accessed May 5, 2014, http://triproftri.wordpress.com/2012/03/03/big-data-dh-gender-silence-in-the-archives/. Stone and Lawson, “‘One Hot Electric Breath,’” 101–26.
Thomas N. Friemel, “Why Context Matters,” Why Context Matters: Applications of Social Network Analysis (Wiesbaden, DE, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2008), 10, doi: 10.1007/978–3-531–91184-7.
Charlotte Yeldham, Margaret Gillies RWS, Unitarian Painter of Mind and Emotion, 1803–1887 (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1997).
Christopher Kent, “The Whittington Club: A Bohemian Experiment in Middle Class Social Reform,” Victorian Studies 18, no. 1 (1974): 31–55.
David M. Blei, “Topic Modeling and Digital Humanities,” Journal of Digital Humanities 2, no. 1 (2012): 8–11, accessed April 28, 2014, http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2–1/topic-modeling-and-digitalhumanities-by-david-m-blei/.
Kathryn Jane Gleadle, The Early Feminists: Radical Unitarians and the Emergence of the Women’s Rights Movement, c. 1831–1851 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), 1.
Alexis Easley, “Tait’s Edinburgh Magazine in the 1830s: Dialogues on Gender, Class, and Reform,” Victorian Periodicals Review 38, no. 3 (2005): 263–79.
NINES: Nineteenth Century Scholarship Online, accessed April 28, 2014, http://www.nines.org/. Bethany Nowviskie, “A Scholar’s Guide to Research, Collaboration, and Publication in NINES,” Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net 47 (2007), accessed April 28, 2014, http://www.erudit.org/revue/ravon/2007/v/n47/016707ar.html. Dino Franco Felluga, “Addressed to the NINES: The Victorian Archive and the Disappearance of the Book,” Victorian Studies 48, no. 2 (2006): 305–19.
Tara McPherson, “Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation,” in Debates in the Digital Humanities, ed. Matthew K. Gold (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012), 139–160.
Jacqueline Wernimont, “Whence Feminism? Assessing Feminist Interventions in Digital Literary Archives,” Digital Humanities Quarterly 7, no. 1 (2013), accessed April 28, http://digitalhumanities.org:8080/dhq/vol/7/1/000156/000156.html. Liu, “Where Is the Cultural Criticism in Digital Humanities?” in Debates in Digital Humanities, ed. Matthew K. Gold (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012), 490–509.
Martha Nell Smith, “The Human Touch, Software of the Highest Order: Revisiting Editing as Interpretation,” Textual Cultures 2, no. 1 (2007): 1–15.
Donna Haraway, “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective,” Feminist Studies 14, no. 3 (1988): 590.
Paul Baker and Amanda Potts, “‘Why Do White People Have Thin Lips?’ Google and the Perpetuation of Stereotypes via Auto-Complete Search Forms,” Critical Discourse Studies 10, no. 2 (2013): 187–204. “UN Women Ad Series Reveals Widespread Sexism,” UN Women, October 21, 2013, accessed April 28, 2014, http://www.unwomen.org/ca/news/stories/2013/10/women-should-ads.
George Eliot, Middlemarch (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987), 139.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2015 Veronica Alfano and Andrew Stauffer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, S. (2015). Networking Feminist Literary History: Recovering Eliza Meteyard’s Web. In: Alfano, V., Stauffer, A. (eds) Virtual Victorians. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137393296_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137393296_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-48530-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-39329-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)