Abstract
The continuing increase in the level of paid employment amongst women raises important questions as to the allocation of domestic work. As the total of paid working hours within households continues to rise, who will carry out the domestic work traditionally undertaken (unpaid) by women? One solution is for men to undertake more caring and domestic work, and Fraser (1994) has argued that this outcome, that is, a move towards a ‘universal caregiver’ or ‘dual earner/dual carer’ (Crompton, 1999) society, is a necessary one if true gender equity is to be achieved. Another solution is the ‘outsourcing’ of childcare and other domestic tasks — that is, to pay someone else (usually another woman) to do them. Alternatively, women can continue to work a ‘double shift’ — in other words, retain the responsibility for household and domestic work whilst being in paid employment. What is the impact of these rather different solutions? Does it matter who does the housework as long as it gets done? In this paper, we will, in a preliminary fashion, begin to explore these questions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Rosemary Crompton and Clare Lyonette
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crompton, R., Lyonette, C. (2007). Occupational Class, Country and the Domestic Division of Labour. In: Crompton, R., Lewis, S., Lyonette, C. (eds) Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800830_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230800830_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54127-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-80083-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)