Abstract
Models of elections typically indicate that all parties, in equilibrium, will adopt positions at the electoral center. This situation, however, is seldom observed. This chapter outlines how an integrated theory of party strategy may be constructed based on a theorem for existence of Local Nash Equilibrium (LNE) in a stochastic electoral model where political agents have differing valence, or electorally perceived quality. In a model based on exogenous valence, it is shown that, under proportional representation, a high valence political leader may be motivated to switch party so as to control a centrist policy position. Under plurality rule, political agents may be forced to switch party as a result of the conflicting demands of activist coalitions.
This chapter is based on work supported by NSF grant 0715929, and a research grant from the Weidenbaum Center, Washington University. The chapter was revised while Schofield was a visiting fellow at ICER, Turin. Versions have been presented at conferences at Trinity College, Dublin, at the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, and at Emory University. The figures are reproduced from Schofield and Sened (2006) with permission of Cambridge University Press.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
3.7 References
Aldrich, John H. 1983a. “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activists.” American Political Science Review 77 (December): 974–990.
Aldrich, John H. 1983b. “A Spatial Model with Party Activists: Implications for Electoral Dynamics.” Public Choice 41 (January): 63–100.
Aldrich, John H. and Michael McGinnis. 1989. “A Model of Party Constraints on Optimal Candidate Locations.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 12 (4-5): 437–450.
Arian, Asher and Michal Shamir. 1999. The Election in Israel: 1996. Albany: SUNY Press.
Banks, Jeff S. and John Duggan. 2005. “Probabilistic Voting in the Spatial Model of Elections.” In Social Choice and Strategic Decisions, ed. David Austen Smith and John Duggan. Heidelberg: Springer.
Benoit, Kenneth and Michael Laver. 2006. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
Branch, Taylor. 1998. Pillar of Fire. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Dow, John K. and Jay Endersby. 2004. “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting Research.” Electoral Studies 23 (March): 107–122.
Downs, Anthony 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Hinich, Melvin. 1977. “Equilibrium in Spatial Voting: The Median Voter Result Is an Artifact.” Journal of Economic Theory 16 (2): 208–219.
Hotelling, Harold 1929. “Stability in Competition.” Economic Journal 39 (March): 41–57.
Jeong, Gyung-Ho, Itai Sened, Yael Shomer, with Yanai Sened. 2008. “Two Decades of Israeli Legislative Politics: 1988–2006.” Typescript: Washington University in Saint Louis.
Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted 1998. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lin, Tse Min, James Enelow, and Han Dorussen. 1999. “Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial Voting.” Public Choice 98 (January): 59–82.
McKelvey, Richard D. and John W. Patty. 2006. “A Theory of Voting in Large Elections.” Games and Economic behavior 57 (October): 155–180.
Milburn, John. 2006. “Former GOP Chairman Parkinson Switches Affiliation to Democrat.” Kansas City Star, May 30.
Miller, Gary and Norman Schofield. 2003. “Activists and Partisan Realignment in the U.S.” American Political Science Review 97 (May): 245–260.
Miller, Gary and Norman Schofield. 2008. “The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S.” Perspectives on Politics 6 (3): 433–450.
Poole, Keith and Howard Rosenthal. 1984. “U.S. Presidential Elections 1968–1980: A Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 28 (May): 283–312.
Schofield, Norman. 1999. “The Heart and the Uncovered Set.” Journal of Economics Suppl. 8: 79–113.
Schofield, Norman. 2006. Equilibria in the Spatial Stochastic Model with Party Activists. Review of Economic Design 10 (December): 183–203.
Schofield, Norman. 2007. “The Mean Voter Theorem: Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Convergent Equilibrium.” Review of Economic Studies 74 (July): 965–980.
Schofield, Norman. 2008. The Spatial Model of Politics. London: Routledge.
Schofield, Norman and Gary Miller. 2007. “Elections and Activist Coalitions in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (July): 518–531.
Schofield, Norman and Itai Sened. 2006. Multiparty Democracy: Elections and Legislative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schofield, Norman, Gary Miller, and Andrew Martin. 2003. “Critical Elections and Political Realignments in the USA: 1860–2000.” Political Studies 51 (June): 217–240.
Stokes, Donald. 1963. “Spatial Models of Party Competition.” American Political Science Review 57 (June): 368–377.
Stokes, Donald. 1992. “Valence Politics.” In Electoral Politics, ed. Dennis Kavanagh. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Westen, Drew. 2007. The Political Brain. New York: Perseus Books.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2009 William B. Heller and Carol Mershon
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schofield, N. (2009). Switching Equilibria. In: Heller, W.B., Mershon, C. (eds) Political Parties and Legislative Party Switching. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622555_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230622555_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37425-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-62255-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)