Skip to main content
  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

It might be thought that the introduction of nuclear weapons created a wholly unprecedented situation rendering all previous strategic theories and concepts immediately obsolete. In fact such a demarcation line is hard to establish. The concepts with which nuclear weapons were first understood were derived from a prior era; many of the post-1945 debates were, in essence, continuations of those of pre-war days. The main link was provided by the doctrine of strategic bombardment, which assumed that the most effective use of aircraft was to attack the social and industrial heart of the enemy, so producing internal collapse and obviating the need for a traditional battlefield victory. Support for this doctrine grew with the quality of aircraft performance and also out of the desire to avoid a repetition of the murderous stalemate of the Great War.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Quoted in George Quester, Deterrence Before Hiroshima: The Influence of Airpower on Modern Strategy (New York: John Wiley, 1966), p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Giulio Douhet, The Command of the Air, as translated by Dino Ferrari (New York: Coward-McCann Inc., 1942), pp. 220, 202.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The efforts to secure formal international agreement on restraint are described by Donald Cameron Watt in ‘Restraints on war in the air before 1945’, in Michael Howard (ed.), Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict (London: Oxford University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. H. Liddell Hart, The Revolution in Warfare (London: Faber & Faber; 1946), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Irving, The Mare’s Nest (London: William Kimber, 1964), pp. 181, 210, 291, 294.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard G. Hewlett and Oscar Anderson, The New World 1939/46: vol. I of a history of the ASAEC (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press, 1962);

    Google Scholar 

  7. Margaret Gowing, Britain and Atomic Energy, 1939–1945 (London: Macmillan, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry L. Stimson and McGeorge Bundy, On Active Service in Peace and War (London: Hutchinson, 1948), p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herbert Feis, The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War 11, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966), p. 87; Margaret Gowing, op. cit., p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. This is discussed in detail in Lawrence Freedman, ‘The strategy of Hiroshima’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, i, 1 (May 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted by L. Giovannitti and F. Freed, The Decision to Drop the Bomb (London: Methuen & Co., 1967), p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leslie R. Groves, Now It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project (New York: Harper, 1962) p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert J. C. Butow, japan’s Decision to Surrender (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1954), p. 180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2003 Lawrence Freedman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freedman, L. (2003). The Arrival of the Bomb. In: The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230379435_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics