Abstract
This chapter takes stock with the research on the authority of international organizations (IOs) and international public administrations (IPAs) in the fields of International Relations (IR) and Public Administration (PA). It combines arguments from conceptual and theoretical debates with empirical findings to explore under which conditions IPAs are likely to enjoy authority. Based on a review of the literature and on conceptual clarifications, we define authority as a social relationship between holders and granters of authority. We distinguish two types of authority, namely, political and expert authority, and two forms of recognition, namely, in practice (de facto) and by formal delegation (de jure). Given that the de facto expert authority of IPAs has received least attention in the literature, while the PA literature reminds us that knowledge lies at the heart of bureaucratic power, we develop propositions on how de facto expert authority could be measured and how the anticipated variation of expert authority among IPAs could be explained. We illustrate our argument with reference to empirical findings in the IR and PA literature. We conclude by highlighting the implications of our discussion for future research on the authority of national and IPAs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersen, S. S., & Burns, T. R. (1996). The European Union and the erosion of parliamentary democracy: A study of post-parliamentary governance. In S. S. Andersen & K. A. Eliassen (Eds.), The European Union: How democratic is it? London: Sage Publications.
Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking Press.
Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who governs the globe. In D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, & S. K. Sell (Eds.), Who governs the globe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Bartlett, K. R. (2005). Survey research in organizations. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton (Eds.), Research in organizations. Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Fracisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publications.
Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49.
Bauer, S., & Weinlich, S. (2011). International bureaucracies: Organizing World politics. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). The influence of international bureaucracies in world politics: Findings from the MANUS research program. In F. Biermann & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of global change. The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., Bauer, S., Busch, P.-O., Campe, S., Dingwerth, K., et al. (2009). Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: A conceptual framework. In F. Biermann & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of global change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bogason, P. (2007). Postmodern public administration. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Busch, P.-O. (2014). The independent influence of international public administrations. Contours and future directions of an emerging research strand. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cooper, S., Hawkins, D., Jacoby, W., & Nielson, D. (2008). Yielding sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing system structure back in. International Studies Review, 10(3), 501–524.
Cronin, B., & Hurd, I. (Eds.) (2008). The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London: Routledge.
Cutler, C. A., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (Eds.) (1999). Private authority and international affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Day, J. (1963). Authority. Political Studies, 11(3), 257–271.
Derlien, H.-U. (2011). Bürokratietheorie. Einführung in eine Theorie der Verwaltung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Dijkstra, H. (2010). Explaining variation in the role of the EU Council Secretariat in first and second pillar policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 527–544.
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). “But the UN Said So ...”: International Organisations as Discursive Authorities. Global Society, 26(4), 451–471.
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2009). Inter- und transnationale Organisationen als symbolische Autoritäten der Mediendemokratie. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie. PVS Sonderheft 42/2009. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2007). Neue Autoritäten? Ein kommunikationstheoretischer Blick auf die Deutungsmacht inter- und transnationaler Akteure in der Darfurkrise. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
Eckstein, H., & Gurr, T. R. (1975). Patterns of authority: A structural basis for political inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
Friedman, R. B. (1990). On the concept of authority in political philosophy. In J. Raz (Ed.), Authority. New York: New York University Press.
Genovese, F. (2015). Politics ex cathedra: religious authority and the Pope in modern international relations. Research and Politics, 2(4).
Geuss, R. (2001). History and illusion in politics. Cambidge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
Hall, R. B. (1997). Moral authority as a power resource. International Organization, 51(4), 591–622.
Hartmann, H. (1964). Funktionale Autorität. Stuttgart: Enke.
Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D., & Tierney, M. J. (Eds.) (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–328.
Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.
Hurd, I. (2008). Theories and Tests Of International Authority. In B. Conin & I. Hurd (Eds.), The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London: Routledge.
Katsikas, D. (2010). Non-state authority and global governance. Review of International Studies, 36(Supplement 1), 113–135.
Kim, Y. C. (1966). Authortiy: Some conceptual and empirical notes. The Western Political Quarterly, 19(2), 223–234.
Koppell, J. G. S. (2008). Global governance organizations: Legitimacy and authority in conflict. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 177–203.
Lake, D. A. (2013). Authority, coercion and power in international relations. In M. Finnemore & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Back to basics: State power in a contemporary world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lake, D. A. (2007). Escape from the State of nature. Authority and hierarchy in World Politics. International Security, 32(1), 47–79.
Lake, D. A. (2010). Rightful rules: Authority, order, and foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 587–613.
Liese, A., & Weinlich, S. (2006). Verwaltungsstäbe internationaler Organisationen: Lücken, Tücken und Konturen eines (neuen) Forschungsfelds. In Bogumil, J., Jann, W., & Nullmeier, F. (eds). Politik und Verwaltung, PVS-Sonderheft 37.
Litfin, K. T. (2000). Environment, wealth, and authority: Global climate change and emerging modes of legitimation. International Studies Review, 2(2), 119–148.
Lukes, S. (1990). Perspectives on Authority. In J. Raz (Ed.), Authority. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Raz, J. (Ed.) (1990). Authority. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Olsen, J. P. (2008). The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 13–37.
Simmons, A. J. (2012). Authority. In D. Estlund (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Straßenberger, G. (2013). Autorität: Herrschaft ohne Zwang—Anerkennung ohne Deliberation Berliner. Journal für Soziologie, 23(3–4), 493–509.
Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., & Larsson, T. (2010). Unpacking international organisations. The dynmaics of compound bureaucracies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
United Nations (2013). United Nations Policy on integrated assessment and planning. New York: United Nations.
Weber, M. (1991). Bureaucracy. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Weber, M. 1921 (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Yi-chong, X., & Weller, P. (2008). “To be, but not to be seen”: Exploring the impact of international civil servants. Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51.
Zürn, M. (2015). Jenseits der Anarchie: Autorität und Herrschaft in der Global Governance. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56(2), 319–333.
Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–109.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Busch, PO., Liese, A. (2017). The Authority of International Public Administrations. In: Bauer, M., Knill, C., Eckhard, S. (eds) International Bureaucracy. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94976-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94977-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)