Skip to main content

The Authority of International Public Administrations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover International Bureaucracy

Part of the book series: Public Sector Organizations ((PSO))

Abstract

This chapter takes stock with the research on the authority of international organizations (IOs) and international public administrations (IPAs) in the fields of International Relations (IR) and Public Administration (PA). It combines arguments from conceptual and theoretical debates with empirical findings to explore under which conditions IPAs are likely to enjoy authority. Based on a review of the literature and on conceptual clarifications, we define authority as a social relationship between holders and granters of authority. We distinguish two types of authority, namely, political and expert authority, and two forms of recognition, namely, in practice (de facto) and by formal delegation (de jure). Given that the de facto expert authority of IPAs has received least attention in the literature, while the PA literature reminds us that knowledge lies at the heart of bureaucratic power, we develop propositions on how de facto expert authority could be measured and how the anticipated variation of expert authority among IPAs could be explained. We illustrate our argument with reference to empirical findings in the IR and PA literature. We conclude by highlighting the implications of our discussion for future research on the authority of national and IPAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersen, S. S., & Burns, T. R. (1996). The European Union and the erosion of parliamentary democracy: A study of post-parliamentary governance. In S. S. Andersen & K. A. Eliassen (Eds.), The European Union: How democratic is it? London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1961). Between past and future: Six exercises in political thought. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avant, D. D., Finnemore, M., & Sell, S. K. (2010). Who governs the globe. In D. D. Avant, M. Finnemore, & S. K. Sell (Eds.), Who governs the globe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, K. R. (2005). Survey research in organizations. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton (Eds.), Research in organizations. Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Fracisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S. (2006). Does bureaucracy really matter? The authority of intergovernmental treaty secretariats in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S., & Weinlich, S. (2011). International bureaucracies: Organizing World politics. In B. Reinalda (Ed.), The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). The influence of international bureaucracies in world politics: Findings from the MANUS research program. In F. Biermann & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of global change. The influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B., Bauer, S., Busch, P.-O., Campe, S., Dingwerth, K., et al. (2009). Studying the influence of international bureaucracies: A conceptual framework. In F. Biermann & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Managers of global change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bogason, P. (2007). Postmodern public administration. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, P.-O. (2014). The independent influence of international public administrations. Contours and future directions of an emerging research strand. In S. Kim, S. Ashley, & W. H. Lambright (Eds.), Public administration in the context of global governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S., Hawkins, D., Jacoby, W., & Nielson, D. (2008). Yielding sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing system structure back in. International Studies Review, 10(3), 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., & Hurd, I. (Eds.) (2008). The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, C. A., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (Eds.) (1999). Private authority and international affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. (1963). Authority. Political Studies, 11(3), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derlien, H.-U. (2011). Bürokratietheorie. Einführung in eine Theorie der Verwaltung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, H. (2010). Explaining variation in the role of the EU Council Secretariat in first and second pillar policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(4), 527–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). “But the UN Said So ...”: International Organisations as Discursive Authorities. Global Society, 26(4), 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2009). Inter- und transnationale Organisationen als symbolische Autoritäten der Mediendemokratie. In F. Marcinkowski & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Politik in der Mediendemokratie. PVS Sonderheft 42/2009. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2007). Neue Autoritäten? Ein kommunikationstheoretischer Blick auf die Deutungsmacht inter- und transnationaler Akteure in der Darfurkrise. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, H., & Gurr, T. R. (1975). Patterns of authority: A structural basis for political inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. B. (1990). On the concept of authority in political philosophy. In J. Raz (Ed.), Authority. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, F. (2015). Politics ex cathedra: religious authority and the Pope in modern international relations. Research and Politics, 2(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2001). History and illusion in politics. Cambidge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. B. (1997). Moral authority as a power resource. International Organization, 51(4), 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H. (1964). Funktionale Autorität. Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. G., Lake, D. A., Nielson, D., & Tierney, M. J. (Eds.) (2006). Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Delegation and pooling in international organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and authority in international politics. International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (2008). Theories and Tests Of International Authority. In B. Conin & I. Hurd (Eds.), The UN Security Council and the Politics of International Authority. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsikas, D. (2010). Non-state authority and global governance. Review of International Studies, 36(Supplement 1), 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. C. (1966). Authortiy: Some conceptual and empirical notes. The Western Political Quarterly, 19(2), 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppell, J. G. S. (2008). Global governance organizations: Legitimacy and authority in conflict. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 177–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2013). Authority, coercion and power in international relations. In M. Finnemore & J. Goldstein (Eds.), Back to basics: State power in a contemporary world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2007). Escape from the State of nature. Authority and hierarchy in World Politics. International Security, 32(1), 47–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake, D. A. (2010). Rightful rules: Authority, order, and foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 587–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liese, A., & Weinlich, S. (2006). Verwaltungsstäbe internationaler Organisationen: Lücken, Tücken und Konturen eines (neuen) Forschungsfelds. In Bogumil, J., Jann, W., & Nullmeier, F. (eds). Politik und Verwaltung, PVS-Sonderheft 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, K. T. (2000). Environment, wealth, and authority: Global climate change and emerging modes of legitimation. International Studies Review, 2(2), 119–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1990). Perspectives on Authority. In J. Raz (Ed.), Authority. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, J. (Ed.) (1990). Authority. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2008). The ups and downs of bureaucratic organization. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, A. J. (2012). Authority. In D. Estlund (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straßenberger, G. (2013). Autorität: Herrschaft ohne Zwang—Anerkennung ohne Deliberation Berliner. Journal für Soziologie, 23(3–4), 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J., Marcussen, M., & Larsson, T. (2010). Unpacking international organisations. The dynmaics of compound bureaucracies. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2013). United Nations Policy on integrated assessment and planning. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1991). Bureaucracy. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1921 (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi-chong, X., & Weller, P. (2008). “To be, but not to be seen”: Exploring the impact of international civil servants. Public Administration, 86(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. (2015). Jenseits der Anarchie: Autorität und Herrschaft in der Global Governance. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 56(2), 319–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busch, PO., Liese, A. (2017). The Authority of International Public Administrations. In: Bauer, M., Knill, C., Eckhard, S. (eds) International Bureaucracy. Public Sector Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94977-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics