Abstract
‘Economic giant, political dwarf!’ — ‘The EU does not get its act together’ — ‘The capability-expectation gap is widening’ (on the latter see Hill, 1993; for a most recent criticism of the EU’s inability to develop a coherent foreign policy see Howorth, 2010). These are only a few of the many indictments of the European Union’s (EU) foreign and security policy to be found in the editorials, but also occasionally in the scholarly literature. And yet it moves! As Daniel Thomas writes in this volume (ch.1), there have been more than 1,000 common strategies, common positions, and joint actions under Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) since 1993 and more than 2,000 foreign policy statements by the EU Council and Presidency between 1995 and 2008. In other words, cooperation on foreign policy matters is the rule rather than the exception in the EU — and the empirical case studies in this volume document it in detail. They show beyond doubt that the EU has emerged as a foreign policy actor which pursues rather coherent foreign policies — if it wants to and if the conditions are right. Thus, the EU’s actorness in foreign and security policy matters is no longer in question (see Sjursen, 2006). This is the first good news about this volume. It could be stated even more loudly and more clearly — particularly in light of the bad press that the EU’s foreign policy got recently in the context of Catherine Ashton’s appointment as EU ‘foreign minister’ (High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, to be precise) and the turbulent negotiations surrounding the European External Action Service (EEAS).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works cited
Adler, E. (2002) ‘Constructivism in International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, B. Simmons and T. Risse (eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, pp.95–118.
Carlsnaes, W. (2002) ‘Foreign Policy’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. Simmons (eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, pp.331–49.
Checkel, J.T. (2005) ‘International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework’, International Organization, 59(4): 801–26.
Diez, T. (2005) ‘Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering “Normative Power Europe”’, Millennium, 33(3): 613–36.
Duchêne, F. (1972) ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, in R. Mayne (ed.) Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead. London: Fontana/Collins, pp.32–47.
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996) ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies, 44: 952–73.
Hill, C. (1993) ‘The Capability Expectation Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4): 305–28.
Howorth, J. (2010) ‘The EU as a Global Actor: Grand Strategy for a Global Grand Bargain?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3): 455–74.
Keohane, R.O. (1986) ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization, 40(1): 1–27.
Khanna, P. (2004) ‘The Metrosexual Superpower’, Foreign Policy, July—August.
Krasner, S.D. (1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in S.D. Krasner (ed.) International Regimes. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, pp.1–21.
Lewis, J. (2000) ‘The Method of Community in EU Decision-Making and Administrative Rivalry in the Council’s Infrastructure’, Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2): 261–89.
Lewis, J. (2005) ‘The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union’, International Organization, 59(4): 937–71.
Magen, A., Risse, T. and McFaul, M. (eds) (2009) Promoting Democracy and the Rule of Law. American and European Strategies. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2): 235–58.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basics of Politics. New York, London: The Free Press.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J. P. (1998) ‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’, International Organization, 52(4): 943–69.
Peters, G. (2005) Institutional Theoty in Political Science. London: Routledge.
Risse, T. (2000) ‘“Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in International Relations’, International Organization, 54(1): 1–39.
Risse, T. (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) ‘Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Enlargement of the EU’, International Organization, 55(1): 47–80.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2003) The EU, NATO, and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, V.A. (2002) ‘Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare Adjustment?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35(2): 168–93.
Schmidt, V.A. (2008) ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 303–26.
Sjursen, H. (2006) ‘What Kind of Power?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2): 169–81.
Wendt, A. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization, 41(3): 335–70.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Thomas Risse
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Risse, T. (2011). Norms and All That: Progress in Research on EU Foreign Policy. In: Thomas, D.C. (eds) Making EU Foreign Policy. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307360_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307360_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32787-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30736-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)