Abstract
In this highly connected twenty-first century, learners are exposed to more information where they will need to critically examine the information at hand and communicate possible solutions to issues. Mobile devices, such as smartphones, allow learners to be connected to the world, literally, at their fingertips. Moreover, mobile devices help engage and motivate learners in their learning. However, past studies caution that mobile technology needs to be supported by sound pedagogy for it to be truly effective for learning. An inquiry-based intervention programme, to enhance learners’ oral communication, creativity and critical thinking, i.m.STELLAR, was designed. Two overarching principles of the programme are delineated. This programme was empirically tested with 304 learners, 114 of whom were in the intervention. The study provides empirical evidence for the effectiveness of i.m.STELLAR. Learners’ oral communication and critical thinking scores were higher when compared to the control group. Although creativity scores were not significantly higher, the overall means were in the right direction. The study reinforces the message of sound pedagogical strategies in using mobile technologies for teaching and learning. It also highlights the value of inquiry-based approaches for engaging learners and nurturing their twenty-first-century competencies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alberta Learning. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning (p. 2007). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Learning and Teaching Resources Branch.
Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Wright, M. (2012). Creating personal meaning through technology-supported science inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 251–273.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer.
Buckner, E., & Kim, P. (2014). Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). Prospects, 44(1), 99–118. doi:10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7.
Cantrell, R. J., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/027027100278310.
Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones: Informal learning with PDAs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00268.x.
Corrin, L., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Digital natives: Exploring the diversity of young people’s experience with technology. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Reshaping learning. New York: Springer.
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. (2013). New wine into old skins: The enactment of literacy policy in Singapore. [Article]. Language & Education: An International Journal, 27(3), 246–260. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.704046.
Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008). Using discussion pedagogy to enhance oral and written communication skills. College Teaching, 56(3), 163–172. doi:10.3200/CTCH.56.3.163-172.
Davey, S. (2004). Consensus, caring and community: An inquiry into dialogue. Analytic Teaching, 25(1), 18–51.
Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.
Fisher, D. B., & Frey, N. (2004). Improving adolescent literacy: Strategies that work. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Rando, N. (2013). Evaluation of learning outcomes using an educational iPhone game vs. traditional game [Article]. Computers & Education, 64, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.001.
Goh, C. C. M. (2007). Teaching speaking in the language classroom (Vol. 15). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Haisen, Z., Wei, S., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones [Article]. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203–214.
Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(4), 338–354.
Koh, E., Loh, J., & Hong, H. (2013). A snapshot approach of a smartphone-enabled implementation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 25.
Kong, S. C., & Song, Y. (2014). The impact of a principle-based pedagogical design on inquiry-based learning in a seamless learning environment in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 127–141.
Kuhne, B. (1995). The Barkestorp project: Investigating school library use. School Libraries Worldwide, 1(1), 13–27.
Lafortune, L., Daniel, M.-F., Schleifer, M., & Pallascio, R. (1999). Philosophical reflection and cooperative practices in an elementary school mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Education, 24(4), 426.
Lam, C.-M., & Chi-Ming, L. (2012). Continuing Lipman’s and Sharp’s pioneering work on philosophy for children: Using Harry to foster critical thinking in Hong Kong students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(2), 187.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., & So, H.-J. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x.
Looi, C.-K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: A study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269–287.
Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone [Article]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x.
Marcelo, M., & Daniel, S. (2007). Anytime, anywhere learning supported by smart phones: Experiences and results from the MUSIS project. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 62–70.
McLeod, T. L. (2011). Philosophy for children as a pedagogy for developing oral English language skills with English as a second language students. New Mexico State University.
Millett, S., & Tapper, A. (2012). Benefits of collaborative philosophical inquiry in schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 546–567. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00727.x.
Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2010, November–December). Mobile technologies and mobile learning: Could they be the hope and future of education in America? District Administration, 46, 80.
Odierna, R. (2012). Philosophy for children Kenyan style. Educational Perspectives, 44(1–2), 46–50.
Ogle, D. M. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.
Ogle, D. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 205–223). Newark: International Reading Association.
Ogle, D. (1992). KWL in action: Secondary teachers find applications that work. In Reading in the content areas: Improving classroom instruction (pp. 270–281). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
Owens, R. F., Hester, J. L., & Teale, W. H. (2002). Where do you want to go today? Inquiry-based learning and technology integration. Reading Teacher, 55(7), 616–625.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.
Prensky, M. (2005). What can you learn from a cell phone? Almost anything! Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 1(5). Available at:http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss5/2
Reznitskaya, A., Alina, R., & Monica, G. (2013). Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings. The Journal of Educational Research (Washington, D.C.), 106(1), 49.
Sandberg, J. A. C., Maris, M., & Geus, D. K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1334–1347. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.015.
Saran, M., Seferoglu, G., & Cagıltay, K. (2009). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation at learners’ fingertips [Article]. Cep Telefonu Yardımıyla Dil Öğrenme: İngilizce Telaffuz Öğrenimi Parmaklarınızın Ucunda (34), 97–114.
Saran, M., Seferoğlu, G., Ccedil, & Cağıltay, K. (2012). Mobile language learning: Contribution of multimedia messages via mobile phones in consolidating vocabulary [Article]. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 21(1), 181–190.
Silver, R. (2008). Peer work, peer talk, and language acquisition in Singapore primary classrooms. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Singapore.
Stinson, M., & Freebody, K. (2006). The Dol project: The contributions of process drama to improved results in English oral communication. Youth Theatre Journal, 20(1), 27–41. doi:10.1080/08929092.2006.10012585.
Susan, G. (1996). Inquiry is no mere conversation (or discussion or dialogue): Facilitation of inquiry is hard work. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 16(2), 102–111.
Tay, L. Y., Lim, C. P., Lye, S. Y., Ng, K. J., & Lim, S. K. (2011). Open-source learning management system and Web 2.0 online social software applications as learning platforms for an elementary school in Singapore. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(4), 349–365.
Tay, L. Y., Lim, S. K., Lim, C. P., & Koh, J. H. L. (2012a). Pedagogical approaches for ICT integration into primary school English and mathematics: A Singapore case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 740–754.
Tay, L. Y., Ng, J. S., Lim, C. P., Nair, S. S., & Lim, S. K. (2012b). English language learning in a one-to-one computing environment – Impacts and considerations. Paper presented at the 20th international conference on computers in education, Singapore.
Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380. doi:10.1080/0267152042000248016.
Vaish, V. (2013). Questioning and oracy in a reading program. Language and Education, 27(6), 526–541. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.737334.
Vansieleghem, N., & Kennedy, D. (2011). What is philosophy for children, what is philosophy with children-after Matthew Lipman? [Article]. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 171–182. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00801.x.
Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language, Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117.
Wang, A., Koh, E., & Yang, R. S. (2014). Innovative pedagogical approaches in a multiliteracy world. Paper presented at the the eighteenth global Chinese conference on computers in education.
White, J. (2012). Philosophy in primary schools? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(3), 449–460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2012.00860.x.
Wong, L.-H. (2013). Analysis of students’ after-school mobile-assisted artifact creation processes in a seamless language learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 198–211.
Zhang, B., Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., So, H.-J., Soloway, E., & Norris, C. (2010). Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1504–1523.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix A
Appendix A
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koh, E., Wang, A., Lim, A.H.M., Chua, S.S.L., Naharuddin, N.A. (2016). Engaging English Language Learners with Mobile Devices in the Twenty-First Century. In: Chai, C., Lim, C., Tan, C. (eds) Future Learning in Primary Schools. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-578-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-579-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)