Skip to main content

Engaging English Language Learners with Mobile Devices in the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter

Abstract

In this highly connected twenty-first century, learners are exposed to more information where they will need to critically examine the information at hand and communicate possible solutions to issues. Mobile devices, such as smartphones, allow learners to be connected to the world, literally, at their fingertips. Moreover, mobile devices help engage and motivate learners in their learning. However, past studies caution that mobile technology needs to be supported by sound pedagogy for it to be truly effective for learning. An inquiry-based intervention programme, to enhance learners’ oral communication, creativity and critical thinking, i.m.STELLAR, was designed. Two overarching principles of the programme are delineated. This programme was empirically tested with 304 learners, 114 of whom were in the intervention. The study provides empirical evidence for the effectiveness of i.m.STELLAR. Learners’ oral communication and critical thinking scores were higher when compared to the control group. Although creativity scores were not significantly higher, the overall means were in the right direction. The study reinforces the message of sound pedagogical strategies in using mobile technologies for teaching and learning. It also highlights the value of inquiry-based approaches for engaging learners and nurturing their twenty-first-century competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberta Learning. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning (p. 2007). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Learning and Teaching Resources Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Wright, M. (2012). Creating personal meaning through technology-supported science inquiry learning across formal and informal settings. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, E., & Kim, P. (2014). Integrating technology and pedagogy for inquiry-based learning: The Stanford Mobile Inquiry-based Learning Environment (SMILE). Prospects, 44(1), 99–118. doi:10.1007/s11125-013-9269-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, R. J., Fusaro, J. A., & Dougherty, E. A. (2000). Exploring the effectiveness of journal writing on learning social studies: A comparative study. Reading Psychology, 21(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/027027100278310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P., & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones: Informal learning with PDAs. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00268.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrin, L., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Digital natives: Exploring the diversity of young people’s experience with technology. In R. Huang, Kinshuk, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Reshaping learning. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. (2013). New wine into old skins: The enactment of literacy policy in Singapore. [Article]. Language & Education: An International Journal, 27(3), 246–260. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.704046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2008). Using discussion pedagogy to enhance oral and written communication skills. College Teaching, 56(3), 163–172. doi:10.3200/CTCH.56.3.163-172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, S. (2004). Consensus, caring and community: An inquiry into dialogue. Analytic Teaching, 25(1), 18–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117–128. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. B., & Frey, N. (2004). Improving adolescent literacy: Strategies that work. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Rando, N. (2013). Evaluation of learning outcomes using an educational iPhone game vs. traditional game [Article]. Computers & Education, 64, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. C. M. (2007). Teaching speaking in the language classroom (Vol. 15). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haisen, Z., Wei, S., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones [Article]. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Wu, P. H., Zhuang, Y. Y., & Huang, Y. M. (2013). Effects of the inquiry-based mobile learning model on the cognitive load and learning achievement of students. Interactive Learning Environments, 21(4), 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koh, E., Loh, J., & Hong, H. (2013). A snapshot approach of a smartphone-enabled implementation. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., & Song, Y. (2014). The impact of a principle-based pedagogical design on inquiry-based learning in a seamless learning environment in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhne, B. (1995). The Barkestorp project: Investigating school library use. School Libraries Worldwide, 1(1), 13–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafortune, L., Daniel, M.-F., Schleifer, M., & Pallascio, R. (1999). Philosophical reflection and cooperative practices in an elementary school mathematics classroom. Canadian Journal of Education, 24(4), 426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C.-M., & Chi-Ming, L. (2012). Continuing Lipman’s and Sharp’s pioneering work on philosophy for children: Using Harry to foster critical thinking in Hong Kong students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(2), 187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., & So, H.-J. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00912.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C.-K., Zhang, B., Chen, W., Seow, P., Chia, G., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2011). 1:1 mobile inquiry learning experience for primary science students: A study of learning effectiveness. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone [Article]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 515–525. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcelo, M., & Daniel, S. (2007). Anytime, anywhere learning supported by smart phones: Experiences and results from the MUSIS project. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, T. L. (2011). Philosophy for children as a pedagogy for developing oral English language skills with English as a second language students. New Mexico State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millett, S., & Tapper, A. (2012). Benefits of collaborative philosophical inquiry in schools. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 546–567. doi:10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00727.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2010, November–December). Mobile technologies and mobile learning: Could they be the hope and future of education in America? District Administration, 46, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odierna, R. (2012). Philosophy for children Kenyan style. Educational Perspectives, 44(1–2), 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, D. M. (1986). KWL: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. Reading Teacher, 39(6), 564–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, D. M. (1989). The know, want to know, learn strategy. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of text: Research into practice (pp. 205–223). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, D. (1992). KWL in action: Secondary teachers find applications that work. In Reading in the content areas: Improving classroom instruction (pp. 270–281). Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, R. F., Hester, J. L., & Teale, W. H. (2002). Where do you want to go today? Inquiry-based learning and technology integration. Reading Teacher, 55(7), 616–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (Mslq). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2005). What can you learn from a cell phone? Almost anything! Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 1(5). Available at:http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss5/2

  • Reznitskaya, A., Alina, R., & Monica, G. (2013). Comparing student experiences with story discussions in dialogic versus traditional settings. The Journal of Educational Research (Washington, D.C.), 106(1), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. A. C., Maris, M., & Geus, D. K. (2011). Mobile English learning: An evidence-based study with fifth graders. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1334–1347. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saran, M., Seferoglu, G., & Cagıltay, K. (2009). Mobile assisted language learning: English pronunciation at learners’ fingertips [Article]. Cep Telefonu Yardımıyla Dil Öğrenme: İngilizce Telaffuz Öğrenimi Parmaklarınızın Ucunda (34), 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saran, M., Seferoğlu, G., Ccedil, & Cağıltay, K. (2012). Mobile language learning: Contribution of multimedia messages via mobile phones in consolidating vocabulary [Article]. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 21(1), 181–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, R. (2008). Peer work, peer talk, and language acquisition in Singapore primary classrooms. Singapore: National Institute of Education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, M., & Freebody, K. (2006). The Dol project: The contributions of process drama to improved results in English oral communication. Youth Theatre Journal, 20(1), 27–41. doi:10.1080/08929092.2006.10012585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susan, G. (1996). Inquiry is no mere conversation (or discussion or dialogue): Facilitation of inquiry is hard work. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis, 16(2), 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L. Y., Lim, C. P., Lye, S. Y., Ng, K. J., & Lim, S. K. (2011). Open-source learning management system and Web 2.0 online social software applications as learning platforms for an elementary school in Singapore. Learning, Media and Technology, 36(4), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L. Y., Lim, S. K., Lim, C. P., & Koh, J. H. L. (2012a). Pedagogical approaches for ICT integration into primary school English and mathematics: A Singapore case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 740–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay, L. Y., Ng, J. S., Lim, C. P., Nair, S. S., & Lim, S. K. (2012b). English language learning in a one-to-one computing environmentImpacts and considerations. Paper presented at the 20th international conference on computers in education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). ‘Philosophy for children’: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365–380. doi:10.1080/0267152042000248016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaish, V. (2013). Questioning and oracy in a reading program. Language and Education, 27(6), 526–541. doi:10.1080/09500782.2012.737334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansieleghem, N., & Kennedy, D. (2011). What is philosophy for children, what is philosophy with children-after Matthew Lipman? [Article]. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 171–182. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00801.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language, Learning & Technology, 17(3), 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, A., Koh, E., & Yang, R. S. (2014). Innovative pedagogical approaches in a multiliteracy world. Paper presented at the the eighteenth global Chinese conference on computers in education.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. (2012). Philosophy in primary schools? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 46(3), 449–460. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2012.00860.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L.-H. (2013). Analysis of students’ after-school mobile-assisted artifact creation processes in a seamless language learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 198–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., So, H.-J., Soloway, E., & Norris, C. (2010). Deconstructing and reconstructing: Transforming primary science learning via a mobilized curriculum. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1504–1523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Koh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koh, E., Wang, A., Lim, A.H.M., Chua, S.S.L., Naharuddin, N.A. (2016). Engaging English Language Learners with Mobile Devices in the Twenty-First Century. In: Chai, C., Lim, C., Tan, C. (eds) Future Learning in Primary Schools. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-579-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-578-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-579-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics