Abstract
The explication by Steve Lerman of a social perspective on teaching and learning informed a classroom based research program including five funded projects. This chapter elaborates Lerman’s perspective, illustrates how it informed each of the projects, and presents a specific lesson to exemplify the key elements of this social perspective. The chapter is a description of ways that aspects of Steve’s 1998 plenary address at the conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, titled “A moment in the zoom of a lens: Towards a discursive psychology of mathematics teaching and learning” influenced a program of classroom based research. There are three themes in particular from that address that informed the research program described in the chapter: the search for a descriptive professional language; defining a role for the teacher; and a focus on the social context of the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Askew, M., Brown, M., Rhodes, V., Johnson, D., & Wiliam, D. (1997). Effective teachers of numeracy, final report. London: King’s College.
Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. London: Taylor & Francis.
Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(5), 631–661.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics 1970–1990 (M. Cooper, N. Balacheff, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield, Edited and Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (French version (1998). Théorie des situations didactiques. [Textes rassemblés et préparés par N. Balacheff, M. Cooper, R. Sutherland, & V. Warfield]. Grenoble: La penséesauvage).
Christiansen, B., & Walther, G. (1986). Task and activity. In B. Christiansen, A. G. Howson, & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 243–307). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (1999). Supporting teachers’ learning in social and institutional contexts. In Fou-Lai Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 international conference on mathematics teacher education (pp. 7–77). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.
Department of Education, Employment and Training. (2001). Early years numeracy strategy. http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/eys/num/index.htm
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Ernest, P. (1994). Varieties of constructivism: Their metaphors, epistemologies and pedagogical implications. Hiroshima Journal of Mathematics Education, 2, 1–14.
Inoue, N. (2010). Zen and the art of neriage: Facilitating consensus building in mathematics inquiry lessons through lesson study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Retrieved online from http://www.springerlink.com/content/g33022h2k1384461/
Jorgensen, R. (2009). Cooperative learning environments. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds)., Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32nd conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1, pp. 700–703). Sydney: MERGA.
Lerman, S. (1998). A moment in the zoom of a lens: Towards a discursive psychology of mathematics teaching and learning. In A. Olivier & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 66–81). Stellenbosch.
Middleton, J. A. (1995). A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal construct approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(3), 254–279.
Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.
Sullivan, P. (1999). Seeking a rationale for particular classroom tasks and activities. In J. M. Truran & K. N. Truran (Eds.), Making the difference. Proceedings of the 21st conference of the Mathematics Educational Research Group of Australasia (pp. 15–29). Adelaide.
Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2002). Contexts in mathematics teaching: Snakes or ladders? In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific (pp. 649–656). Auckland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., Zevenbergen, R., & Turner Harrison, R. (2003). Being explicit about aspects of mathematics pedagogy. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 joint meeting of PME and PMENA (pp. 267–275). University of Hawai’i, PME.
Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Jorgensen, R. (2009a). Tasks and pedagogies that facilitate mathematical problem solving. In B. Kaur & Association of Mathematics Educators (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 17–42). Singapore/Hackensack: UK World Scientific Publishing.
Sullivan, P., Prain, V., Campbell, C., Deed, C., Drane, S., Faulkner, M., McDonough, A., Mornane, A., & Smith, C. (2009b). Trying in the middle years: Students’ perceptions of their aspirations and influences on their efforts. Australian Journal of Education, 5(2), 176–191.
Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. New York: Springer.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teaching efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, T. (2002). What does it mean to teach mathematics differently? In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific (pp. 61–71). Auckland: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Zevenbergen, R. (1998). Language, mathematics and social disadvantage: A Bourdieuian analysis of cultural capital in mathematics education. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times (pp. 716–722). Gold Coast: MERGA.
Zevenbergen, R. (2000). “Cracking the code” of mathematics: School success as a function of linguistic, social and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 201–223). New York: JAI/Ablex.
Zevenbergen, P. (2003). Ability grouping in mathematics classrooms: A Bourdieuian analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(3), 5–10.
Zevenbergen, R., Mousley, J., & Sullivan, P. (2004). Disrupting pedagogic relay in mathematics classrooms: Using open-ended Tasks with Indigenous students. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(4), 391–405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sullivan, P. (2015). Researching the Role of the Teacher in Creating Socially Productive Classrooms that Facilitate Mathematics Learning. In: Gates, P., Jorgensen (Zevenbergen), R. (eds) Shifts in the Field of Mathematics Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-179-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-179-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-178-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-179-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)