Abstract
iPads are so ubiquitous now that one sometimes forgets that they came onto the scene and into schools only very recently in 2010. Hence, there is relatively little in current literature on the impact of the use of iPads in teaching and learning. This chapter presents the findings of a 3-year study undertaken in Nanyang Girls’ High School (NYGH) in an all-girls’ secondary school in Singapore. The school had launched the use of the iPad in 2011 through a project called Prototype twenty-first Century Class (P21C2), an initiative to engage, excite and empower the Digital Native through 1: 1 computing environments using the iPad. This chapter describes the key personnel and the implementation involved, with examples of how it changed teaching and learning in class. It also analyses the critical success factors as suggested by the findings of the study. It concludes with some implications this study suggests about the pedagogy for the digital native.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_25
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Electronic monitor registering no brain activity.
References
Aronin, S., & Floyd, K. K. (2013). Using an iPad in inclusive preschool classrooms to introduce STEM concepts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 34–39.
Beach, R. (2012). Uses of digital tools and literacies in the English language arts classroom. Research in the Schools, 19(1), 45–59. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://dtm10.cep.msstate.edu/Rits_191/Rits_191_Beach_5.pdf
Cirillo, M. (2013). What does research say the benefits of discussion in mathematics class are? National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://www.nctm.org/news/content.aspx?id=35384
Culén, A. L., & Gasparini, A. (2011). iPad: A new classroom technology? A report from two pilot studies. INFuture2011. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from fttp://ciaosonowilly.com/_Articles/Imaginarium/_Pdf/iPadANewClassroomTechnology.pdf.
Dewey, J. (1897). My pedagogic creed. The School Journal, LIV(3), 77–80. Retrieved March 14, 2014, from http://infed.org/mobi/john-dewey-my-pedagogical-creed/
Education Scotland. (n.d.). The purpose of the curriculum: The four capacities. Retrieved July 11, 2014 from http://www.educationscotland.gov.uk/thecurriculum/whatiscurriculumforexcellence/thepurposeofthecurriculum/index.asp
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014) A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning, London: Pearson. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://www.michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/3897.Rich_Seam_web.pdf
Garside, C. (1996) Look who’s talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45(3). Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://media.usm.maine.edu/~lenny/Preston_Adam--articles:materials/lect_vs_discuss.pdf
Geist, E. (2011). The game changer: Using iPads in college teacher education classes. College Student Journal, 45(4), 758–768.
Geist, E. (2012). A qualitative examination of two year-olds interaction with tablet based interactive technology. Journal of Instructional Psycholog, 39(1), 26–35.
Hammer, D. (1995). Student inquiry in a physics class discussion. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 401–430.
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
Hoffman, E. S. (2014). Beyond the flipped classroom: redesigning a research methods course for e3 instruction. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (Online), 7(1), 51- n/a. Retrieved March 4, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1477975604?accountid=28158
Kahn, E. (2007). Building fires: Raising achievement through class discussion. English Journal, 96(4), 16–19.
Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., Sheehy, K., & Panadero, C. B. (2014). Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom. Computers & Education, 71, 175–184.
Lineweaver, T. (2010). Online discussion assignments improve students’ class preparation. Teaching of Psychology, 37(3), 204–209.
Manuguerra, M., & Petocz, P. (2011). Promoting student engagement by integrating new technology into tertiary education: The role of the iPad. Asian Social Science, 7(11), 61–65. Retrieved March 2, 2014, from http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/12841
McMinn, S., & Li, Y. (2012). Enhancing interactions with mobile devices in language classrooms. Paper presented at ICT for Language Learning, Florence, Italy, 15–16 November. Retrieved March 2, 2014 from http://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL2012/common/download/Paper_pdf/151-IBT28-FP-Li-ICT2012.pdf
McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., Gharkholonarehe, N., Mumper, R. J., (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(9), 196. Retrieved March 4, 2014, from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1465505598?accountid=28158
Ministry of Education. (2014). Desired outcomes of education. Retrieved July 11, 2014 from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/desired-outcomes/
Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740.
Nanyang Girls’ High School. (n.d.) Prototype 21st century class. Retrieved July 11, 2014 from http://www.nanyanggirlshigh.moe.edu.sg/cos/o.x?c=/wbn/pagetree&func=view&rid=1140687
OECD (2015), Students, computers and learning: Making the connection, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved November 22, 2015 from http://www.oecd.org/education/students-computers-and-learning-9789264239555-en.htm
Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847–858.
Poh, M., Swenson, M. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57(5), 1243–1252. Retrieved July 11, 2014 from http://affect.media.mit.edu/pdfs/10.Poh-etal-TBME-EDA-tests.pdf
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
Puentedura, R. P. (2014). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Lecture at Pine Cobble School. Retrieved March 13, 2014 from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/01/15/SAMRABriefContextualizedIntroduction.pdf
Roehling, P., Kooi, T., Dykema, S., Quisenberry, B., & Vandlen, C. (2011). Engaging the millennial generation in class discussions. College Teaching, 59(1), 1–6.
Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo Sánchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233–249). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Stobart, G. (2014, May 27). What is 21st century learning – And how can assessment help? Paper presented at IAEA Assessment Innovations for the 21st century, Singapore.
Wakefield, J., & Smith, D. (2012). From Socrates to satellites: iPad learning in an undergraduate course. Creative Education, 3(5), 643–648.
Ward, N. D., Finley, R. J., Keil, R. G., & Clay, T. G. (2013). Benefits and limitations of iPads in the high school science classroom and a trophic cascade lesson plan. Journal of Geoscience Education, 61(4), 378–384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tay, H.Y. (2017). A Prototype Twenty-First Century Class: A School-Wide Initiative to Engage the Digital Native. In: Choo, S., Sawch, D., Villanueva, A., Vinz, R. (eds) Educating for the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1673-8_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1671-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1673-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)