Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Critical New Literacies ((CNLI))

Abstract

For beginning researchers undertaking their first major research project, can often be a time of mixed emotions. Initial meetings with supervisors or research collaborators involve addressing questions around the nature and scope of the research question, the methodological tools that will be used to collect data and the ease with which entry into the field of research is possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Athanassoulis, N., & Wilson, J.(2009).When is deception in research ethical? Clinical Ethics, 4(issue number?), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti, L., & Mameli, M.(2006).Deception in psychology: Moral costs and benefits of unsought self-knowledge. Account Research, 13(3), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, G., & Ling, R.(2004).The research process. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crigger, N.J., Holcomb, L., & Weiss, J.(2001).Fundamentalism, multiculturalism, and problems conducting research with populations in developing nations.Nursing Ethics, 8(5), 459–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, C.J., Hardman, M., & Hosp, J.(2008).Designing and conducting research in education. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G.D.1994.The appropriateness of the communicative approach in Vietnam: An interview study in intercultural communication (Unpublished master’s thesis).Faculty of Education, La Trobe University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobedo, C., Guerrero, J., Lujan, G., Ramirez, A., & Serrano, D.(2007).Ethical issues with informed consent. Bio-Ethics Issues. Retrieved from: http://cstep.cs.utep.edu/Ezine-Fall2007issue.pdf

  • Fouka, G., & Mantzorou, M.(2011).What are the major ethical issues in conducting research? Is there a conflict between the research ethics and the nature of nursing? Health Science Journal, 5(1), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie R.(1991).Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012).Ethics and qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmer, J.(2007).The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.).London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, J., & Emanuel, E.J.(Eds.). (2008).Exploitation and developing countries: The ethics of clinical research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S., & Leavy, P. (2011).The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiep, Pham Hoa. (2007).Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity.ELT Journal, 61(3), 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, S., Kelley, P., & Mayall, B. (1996).`Children as research subjects: A risky enterprise. Children and Society, 10(2), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K.(2009).Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 19(11), 1632–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, A.J., Smith, N., & Klein, J.(2010.Ethical decision making and research deception in the behavioral sciences: An application of social contract theory. Ethics & Behavior, 21(3), 222–251.doi:10.1080/10508422.2011.5701

  • Koulouriotis, J.(2011).Ethical considerations in considerations in conducting research with non-native speakers. TESL Canada Journal 28(5), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, E.(1997).Deception in research: After thirty years of controversy. In M. Bibby (Ed.), Review of Australian research in education No. 4: Ethics and education research. Coldstream, Victoria: Australian Association for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamputtong, P.(2010). Performing qualitative cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, T., Acorn, N., & O’Neill, J.(2013).Ethical issues in collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 21(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabelle, V.P.(2011).Ethical dimensions of shared ethnicity, language and immigration experience. TESL Canada Journal, 5, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., & Batten, S.(2003).Ethical issues in cross-cultural research. Retrieved from http://www.educ.uvic.ca/Research/conferences/connections2003/10Marshall105.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermid, F., Peters, K., Jackson, D., & Daly, J.(2014) Conducting qualitative research in the context of pre-existing peer and collegial relationships. Nurse Researcher, 21(5), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, P.(2006).Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNae, R..& Strachan, J.(2010).Researching in cross cultural contexts: A socially just process. Waikato Journal of Education, 15(2), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, I.(2004).Identifying ethical issues in self-study proposals. In J. Loughran (Ed.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp.1393–1442).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V., & Richards, M.(1996).The ethics of social research with children: An overview. Children and Society, 10(2), 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicks, S.D., Korn, J.H., & Mainieri, T.(1997).The rise and fall of deception in social psychology and personality research, 1921 to 1994.Ethics Behaviour, 7(1), 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyame-Asiamah, F., & Patel, N.(2009).Research methods and methodologies for studying organizational learning. Paper presented at European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Izmir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D.(2001), Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(1), 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R.(2009).What a tangled web we weave: Ethical and legal implications of deception in recruitment. Journal of Clinical Research Best Practices, 5(8), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieber, J.E.(1992).Planning ethically responsible research: A guide for students and inernal review boards (vol.31).Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A.B., & Taylor, N.J.(2000).The sociocultural context of childhood: Balancing dependency and agency. In A.B. Smith, N.J. Taylor & M.M. Gollop (Eds.).Children’s voices. Research, policy and practice (pp.1–17).Auckland, NZ: Pearson Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, M., & Williamson, W.(Eds.) (2004).Researchers and their ‘subjects’: Ethics, power, knowledge and consent. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, J.(2012).Ethical challenges in teacher research: The case of an ESP foreign language course in Taiwan.Taiwan International ESP Journal, 3(2), 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W.G.(1997).Border Guards: Ethnographic Fiction and Social Science’. In M. Fine, L. Weis, L.P. Pruitt & A. Burns (Eds.), Off white: Reading on society, race and culture (pp.110–20).New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, R., Crow, G., Heath, S., & Charles, V.(2008).The management of confidentiality and anonymity in social research, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 417–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cacciattolo, M. (2015). Ethical Considerations in Research. In: Vicars, M., Steinberg, S., McKenna, T., Cacciattolo, M. (eds) The Praxis of English Language Teaching and Learning (PELT). Critical New Literacies. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-112-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics