Skip to main content

Esoteric and Open Pedagogies

  • Chapter
The Pedagogy of the Open Society

Part of the book series: Open Education ((OPEN,volume 1))

Abstract

The developments of new technologies and open resources within society have fostered the new creation of different pedagogies including what we call Open Learning Systems (OLS). This article examines the shift from esoteric to open pedagogy and the consequent changes for education and knowledge creation. Traditionally, creative and ‘free’ thinking was confined to esoteric pedagogical traditions for reasons to do with persecution and censorship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arthur, W.B. (2009). The Nature of Technology. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, M.P. (2001). “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Reconceptualizing Scholarship and Transforming the Academy”. Social Forces, 79(4), 1217–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, M. (2009). “An Insider’s Guide to Creative Commons”. Information Today, 26(9), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumanns, H. (2009). “The Future of Universities and the Fate of Free Inquiry and Academic Freedom”. Social Research, 76(3), 795–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard, J. & Dale, P. (2008). “Redesigning Services for the Net-gen and Beyond: A Holistic Review of Pedagogy, Resource, and Learning Space”. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 14, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T. & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and Structure In Higher Education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. M., Gray, H. H., Kerrey, B., Marx, A., Vest, C. M. & Westphal, J. (2009). “Free Inquiry and Academic Freedom: A Panel Discussion Among Academic Leaders”. Social Research, 76(2), 731–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, A.C. & Peters, M.A. (2007). Subjectivity and Truth: Foucault, Education, and the Culture of Self. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2009). “Education after Deconstruction: Between Event and Invention,” in M. Peters & G. Biesta (Eds.), Derrida, Deconstruction, and the Politics of Pedagogy. New York: Peter Lang, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, P. (2006). “The European University – Towards a Wisdom-based Society,” Higher Education in Europe 31(4): 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton (1934). What is Surrealism. Retrieved from: http://www.generation-online.org/c/fcsurrealism2.htm

  • Breton, A, (1924). Manifesto of Surrealism. Retrieved from: http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/French/Manifesto.htm

  • Compayré, G. (1900). The History of Pedagogy. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubberley, E. (1920). The History of Education: Educational Practice and Progress Considered as a Phase of the Development and Spread of Western Civilization. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P., Holland, M. & Matthews, M., (Eds.) (2006). Subject Librarians: Engaging with the Learning and Teaching Environment. Guildford: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: The free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, K. (2009). “Cross Cutting Discussion: A Form of Online Discussion Discovered within Local Political Online Forums,” Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 14(3), 219–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1967/1985). The New Industrial State. 4th ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P.J. & Chun, M. (2005). “Technology and Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges for the New Era,” in P.G. Altbach, R.O. Berdahl, & P.J. Gumport (Eds.) (2005). American Higher Education in the Twenty-first Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges, 2nd Edition, pp. 393–424. Baltimore, Maryland: The John Hopkins University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, W. Lovitt (trans.). New York, NY: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E.D. (1987). Cultural Literacy, What Every American Needs to Know. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P.J., Ory, M.G. & Sher, T.G. (2005). “Yours, Mine, and Ours: The Importance of Scientific Collaboration in Advancing the Field of Behavior Change Research,” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 29: 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787). Critique of Pure Reason. Retrieved from: http://www.rlwclarke.net/courses/LITS3303/2011-2012/01Kant,CritiqueofPureReason.pdf

  • Kivinen, O. & Ristela, P. (2002). “Even Higher Learning Takes Place by Doing: from Postmodern Critique to Pragmatic Action,” Studies in Higher Education 27(4): 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W.Y. (2007). “A Pragmatic Case against Pragmatic Scientific Realism,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 38(2): 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. K.-Y. & Chiu, C. (2008). “Interactive Effects of Multicultural Experiences and Openness to Experiences on Creative Potential,” Creativity Research Journal 20(4): 376–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.J. (2005). “Creating a Foundation for Learning Relationships,” in S.J. Levin (Ed.), Making Distance Education Work: Understanding Learning and Learners at a Distance. Okemos, MI: LearnerAssociates.net LLC, 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, P.O. (2001). Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard J.F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. G. Bennington and B. Massumi(Trans.). MN, Manchester: University of Manchester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahootian, F. & Eastman, T.E. (2009). “Complementary Frameworks of Scientific Inquiry: Hypothetico-deductive, Hypothetico-inductive, and Observationalinductive,” World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution 65(1): 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional Man: Studies in Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2008). “Academic Creativity under New Public Management: Foundations for an Investigation,” Educational Theory 58(3): 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1970). The German Ideology, C.J. Arthur (Ed.). New York, 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, Y. (1981). The Information Society as Post-industrial Society. Bethesda, MD: World Future Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W. (1972). Theories of the Effects of Education on Civic Participation in Developing Societies. New York: Asia Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. (1956). The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, P. (1970). A Text-book in the History of Education. New York: AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, A. (1998). “A Special Relationship? Cultural Studies, Academia and Pedagogy,” Cultural Studies, 12(4): 513–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pievatolo, M.C. (1999). “The Tribunal of Reason: Kant and the Juridical Nature of Pure Reason,” Ratio Juris, 12(3): 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants,” On the Horizon, 9(5): 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procee, H., (2006). Reflection in education: A Kantian Epistemology. Retrieved from: http://cms.kcn.unima.mw:8002/moodle/downloads/chilemba/My%20Documents/PhD%20articles/kant%20and%20 reflection.pdf

  • Ronning, H. (2006). “Systems of Control and Regulation: Copyright Issues, Digital Divides and Citizens’ Rights,” Critical Arts: A South-North Journal of Cultural & Media Studies, 20(1): 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak, T. (1969). The Making of a Counter Culture: Reflections on the Technocratic Society and Its Youthful Opposition. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaita, S. (2008). “Curricular Activism and Academic Freedom: Representations of Arabs and Muslims in Print and Internet Media,” Arab Studies Quarterly, 30(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. (1701). History of Philosophy. Berkeley, CA: Apocryphile Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, A., Singh, A. & Raja M.K. (2009). “Journals and Their Emerging Roles in Knowledge Exchange,” Communications of the ACM, 52(11): 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukdeo, S. (2008). The power of P2P: Information networks, social organizing and education futures. In M. A. Peters & R. G. Britez. (Eds.) (2008). Open education and education for openness, pp. 43–55. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Steward, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang-Yen L. (2007). A pragmatic case against pragmatic scientific realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 38(2), 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, M.A., Liu, TC., Ondercin, D.J. (2012). Esoteric and Open Pedagogies. In: The Pedagogy of the Open Society. Open Education, vol 1. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-967-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics