Skip to main content

Geogebra for Model-Centered Learning in Mathematics Education

An Introduction

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Modeling and Simulations for Learning and Instruction ((MSLI,volume 6))

Abstract

But common as it is, much of education clings too stubbornly to abstraction,without enough models to illustrate and enliven them. The cure for this on the learner’s side is to call for more models. Learners need to recognize that they need models and can seek them out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Alessi, S. (2000). Building versus using simulations. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 175–196). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bu, L. (2010). Modeling the mirascope using dynamic technology. MAA Loci. Retrieved fromhttp://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/23/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3595

  • Gravemeijer, K., & van Galen, F. (2003). Facts and algorithms as products of students' own mathematical activity. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 114–122). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 362–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T., C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2003). Model facilitated learning. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 13–27). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M. (2003). Model-centered learning and instruction. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1, 59–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M., Al-Diban, S., & Blumschein, P. (2000). Mental models & instructional planning. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 129–158). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction--The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bu, L., Schoen, R. (2011). Geogebra for Model-Centered Learning in Mathematics Education. In: Bu, L., Schoen, R. (eds) Model-Centered Learning. Modeling and Simulations for Learning and Instruction, vol 6. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-618-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships