Abstract
But common as it is, much of education clings too stubbornly to abstraction,without enough models to illustrate and enliven them. The cure for this on the learner’s side is to call for more models. Learners need to recognize that they need models and can seek them out.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
Alessi, S. (2000). Building versus using simulations. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 175–196). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Bu, L. (2010). Modeling the mirascope using dynamic technology. MAA Loci. Retrieved fromhttp://mathdl.maa.org/mathDL/23/?pa=content&sa=viewDocument&nodeId=3595
Gravemeijer, K., & van Galen, F. (2003). Facts and algorithms as products of students' own mathematical activity. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 114–122). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Using cognitive tools to represent problems. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 362–381.
Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T., C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 693–719). New York: Macmillan.
Milrad, M., Spector, J. M., & Davidsen, P. I. (2003). Model facilitated learning. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning and teaching with technology: Principles and practices (pp. 13–27). London: Kogan Page.
Minsky, M. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Perkins, D. N. (1986). Knowledge as design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Seel, N. M. (2003). Model-centered learning and instruction. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 1, 59–85.
Seel, N. M., Al-Diban, S., & Blumschein, P. (2000). Mental models & instructional planning. In J. M. Spector & T. M. Anderson (Eds.), Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction and technology: Understanding complexity (pp. 129–158). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction--The Wiskobas Project. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bu, L., Schoen, R. (2011). Geogebra for Model-Centered Learning in Mathematics Education. In: Bu, L., Schoen, R. (eds) Model-Centered Learning. Modeling and Simulations for Learning and Instruction, vol 6. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-618-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-618-2_1
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-618-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)