Skip to main content

Developing Mathematical Potential in Underrepresented Populations through Problem Solving, Mathematical Discourse and Algebraic Reasoning

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Advances in Creativity and Giftedness ((ACAG,volume 1))

Abstract

The following study explored strategies for developing mathematical potential and enhancing mathematics instruction for diverse learners from a low socio-economic population identified as “young scholars”. The intentional focus on designing and creating opportunities to foster mathematical potential and build collective knowledge influenced many of the pedagogical decisions made by the teacher and researcher in their jointly planned research lessons. The most salient features in developing mathematics potential in these young scholars were giving opportunities to 1) engage in rich mathematical tasks and sequence of related problems, b) use multiple representations to develop representational fluency, and c) develop mathematical communication where reasoning and proof and sense-making became a habit of mind and the focus of classroom discourse. Through encouragement and participation in problem solving, mathematical discourse and algebraic reasoning, students exhibited confidence, competence and more of the behavioural characteristics of mathematically proficient students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1999). Mathematics for the moment, or the millennium? Education Week. Downloaded from www.edweek.org/ew/ewstory.cfm?slug=29boaler.h18&keywords=boaler*

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking and classroom practice. In N. Minick, E. Forman, & A. Stone (Eds.), Education and mind (pp. 91–119). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design-based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diversity in Mathematics Education Center for Learning and Teaching. (2007). Culture, race, power and mathematics education. In F. Lester (Ed.), The second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 405–434). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. Y., Harris, J. J., III, Tyson, C. A., & Frazier Trotman, M. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Beyond self-concept and self-esteem for African American students: Improving racial identity improves achievement. The High School Journal, 87(1), 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, S. (2003). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development of mathematical concepts. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representations in school mathematics (pp. 1–23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, I(2), 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K., & van Galen, F. (2003). Facts and algorithms as products of students’ own mathematical activity. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 114–122). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamon, S. (2001). Presenting and representating from fractions to rational numbers. In A. A. Cuoco &F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The roles of representation in school mathematics, 2001 yearbook (pp. 146–165). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Using a translation model for curriculum development and classroom instruction. In Lesh, R. & Doerr, H. (Eds.), Beyond constructivism. Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 238–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics learning study committee, center for education, division of behavioral and social sciences and education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(5), 388–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J., Leppien, J., & Hays, T. (2000). The multiple menu model: A critical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Manfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2003). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world, student-driven learning. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., & Avery, L. D. (2002). Using performance tasks in the identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners: Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 110–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suh, J.M., Fulginiti, K. (2011). Developing Mathematical Potential in Underrepresented Populations through Problem Solving, Mathematical Discourse and Algebraic Reasoning. In: Sriraman, B., Lee, K.H. (eds) The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics. Advances in Creativity and Giftedness, vol 1. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-439-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships