Abstract
In recent centuries there has been an enormous development of science and technology that has allowed us to know much more about the birth and development of life on Earth, how nature works, genetic codes, the universe and its evolution, subatomic physics, etc. Many technologies have brought about significant advances in the well-being of societies, such as electricity, telecommunications, transport, some productive technologies, etc. But there are many patent social and environmental impacts that cause an evident reduction in our quality of life (atmospheric and acoustic contamination, hazardous waste, the deterioration of nature, etc.), in addition to the depletion of resources. These impacts show the unsustainability of the dominant science and technology system. The science of sustainability rejects the dominant paradigm and is based on another that changes the vision of the position of the human species on Earth and in the universe. We must get down off the pedestal from which we think we rule over nature, which is supposedly at our service, to see ourselves as just another species: “The core idea is that nature, imaginative by necessity, has already solved human problems (…) The conscious emulation of life’s genius is a survival strategy for the human race, a path to a sustainable future” (Benyus J. What do you mean by the term biomimicry? www.biomimicryinstitute.org, 2009). The development process of the science and technology system for sustainability requires the fulfilment of the following premises: informative transparency, democratic decision-making, geared towards the universal satisfaction of essential needs in a sustainable way.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allenby, B. R. (2009). The industrial ecology of emerging technologies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 168–183.
Allenby, B. R., & Rejeski, D. (2008). The industrial ecology of emerging technologies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(3).
Anton, P., et al. (2001). The global technological revolution. Santa Monica: National Defence Research Institute.
Benyus, J. (1998). Biomimicry. Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Quill/William Morrow.
Benyus, J. (2009). What do you mean by the term biomimicry?. www.biomimicryinstitute.org
Curtis, F. (2003, March). Eco-localism and sustainability. en Ecological Economics 46
European Commission. (2001a). WHITE PAPER. European transport policy for 2010: Time to decide (COM(2001) 370). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2001b). Libro Verde sobre la política de productos integrada (COM (2001) 68 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2001c). Comunicación sobre el Sexto Programa de Acción de la Comunidad Europea en materia de Medio Ambiente (COM(2001) 31 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2001d). Sustainable production. Challenges & objetives for EU research policy. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2001e). Propuesta de estrategia de desarrollo sostenible (COM(2001)264 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2002a). Towards a global partnership for sustainable development (COM(2002) 82 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2002b). La tecnología medioambiental en pro del desarrollo sostenible (COM(2002) 122 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2004a). Nanotechnologies: A preliminary risk analysis on the basis of a workshop organized in Brussels on 1–2 March 2004. Brussels: DG Health and Consumer Protection.
European Commission. (2004b). National sustainable development strategies in the European Union. A first analysis by the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2004c). Stimulating technologies for sustainable development: An environmental technologies action plan for the European Union (COM (2004) 38 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2007a). Handbook for trade sustainability impact assessment. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2007b). Sustainable urban transport plans (Technical Report 2007/018). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2007c). Comunicación interpretativa sobre residuos y subproductos (COM(2007) 59 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2007d). Green paper on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes (COM(2007) 140 final). Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2007e). Report of environmental technologies (2005–2006) (COM(2007) 162 final). Brussels: European Commission.
Hall, J., & Kerr, R. (2003). Innovation dynamics and environmental technologies: The emergence of fuel cell technology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11.
Hukkinen, J. (2003). From groundless universalism to grounded generalism: improving ecological economic indicators of human-environmental interaction. Ecological Economics, 44, 11–27.
ICSU (International Council For Science). (2005). Science and society: Rights and responsibilities. Paris: ICSU.
ICSU (International Council For Science)., & IGFA (International Group of Funding Agencies for Global Change Research). (2008). IGSU-IGFA review of the Earth Systems Science Partnership (ESSP). Paris: ICSU.
Korowicz, D. (2010). Tipping point. Near-term systemic implications of the peak in global oil production. An outline review. Dublin: Faesta.
Laszlo, E. (2007). An integral theory of everything.
McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle. Remaking the way we make things. Nueva York: North Point Press.
Modvar, C., & Gallopin, G. C. (2005). Sustainable development: Epistemological challenges to science and technology. Santiago: CEPAL, ONU.
Mueller, T. (2008, April). Biomimetics: Design by nature. National Geographic.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (1997c). Reforming environmental regulation in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (1998). Eco-efficiency. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2008a). OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2008. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2008b). Environmental innovation and global markets. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2009b). The bioeconomy to 2030. Designing a policy agenda. Paris: OECD.
OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2009c). Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation. Framework, practices and management. Paris: OECD.
Schettkat, R. (2009). Analyzing rebound effects. Wuppertal: Schumpeter School of Business and Economics.
Spangenberg, J., & O’Connor, M. (2003). Sustainability science in the European research area: Descriptions, definitions, and challenges. Bureau Cologne: Sustainable Europe Research Institute.
UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). (2008). Federal science and the public good. Securing the integrity of science in policy making. Cambridge: UCS Publications.
UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). (2009). Failure to yield. Evaluating the performance of genetically engineered crops. Cambridge: UCS Publications.
UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). (2012). Heads they win, tails we lose. How corporations corrupt science at the public’s expense. Cambridge: UCS Publications.
UNEP (United Nations Enviromental Program). (2003). Environmentally sound technologies for sustainable development (revised draft). Paris: UNEP.
United Nations. (2000). Millennium declaration. UN.
Wakeford, T. (2003, May). Who’s in control? The Ecologist.
WBCSD (Business Council for Sustainable Development). (2000). Eco-efficiency. Geneva: WBCSD.
Wuppertal Institute, et al. (2008). Eco-innovation: Putting the EU on the path to resource. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.
Benyus. (2010). The Biomimicry Institute. Inspiring, educating, and connecting biomimics throughout the world. Biomimicry Institute. www.biomimicryinstitute.org
Funtowics, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755.
Makover, J., & Pernick, R. (2001). Clean Tech: Profits and potential. Clean Edge.
ECOS (Environemental Council of the States). (2007). Regional collaboration among states to improve joint planning and priority setting: A new England case study. ECOS.
Pernick, R., et al. (2010). Clean tech job trends 2010. San Francisco: Clean Edge.
Casey, V. (2012). Biomimicry 3.8: What would you ask nature? Core 77. www.core77.com
Schumacher, E. F. (1978). Lo pequeño es hermoso. Madrid: Hermann Blume.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bermejo, R. (2014). Science and Technology for Sustainability. In: Handbook for a Sustainable Economy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8981-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8981-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8980-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8981-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)