Skip to main content

Sustainability of Social-Economical Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook for a Sustainable Economy
  • 2773 Accesses

Abstract

The governmental institutions declare more and more frequently that its policies have the aim of reaching sustainability. But this concept is systematically being manipulated (the sustainable development alike) by the cores of power, with the aim of removing its capacity of transformation, because they want to develop a free market economy and this is main reason of our process of collision with nature. And, as a result, there is a permanent growth in the consumption of materials and energy, the land is being sealed with an increased pace, and the biodiversity loss is mounting. For that reason there is a growing need of showing clearly where the manipulations are and of determining as precisely as possible what sustainability means. The focal point to know what sustainability means is the fact that being human species part of the biosphere, our economy has to be a sub-system of general economy of materials and energy of nature. So the socio-economical systems have to imitate nature and this means that we must deduct the guiding principles of sustainability from the ecosystems behaviour. There is a growing consensus on the necessity to shut the materials cycles and to use solar energy. But in not enough, we must know the parameters which make possible such aims. And the dynamic of the prevailing economic system run against them. On the contrary, in order to reach the former aims of sustainability we have to mimic the other aspects of the ecosystems behaviour, like evolution, diversity, decentralization, self-organization, self-sufficiency and so on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, T., & Stepp, J. R. (2003). A new ecosystems ecology for anthropology. Conservation Ecology, 7(3), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. R. (2001). Eco-economy. Building an economy for the earth. New York: Earth Policy Institute/Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantlon, J. E., & Koening, H. E. (1999). Sustainable ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 31, 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, P. P. (2001). Early links between sciences of nature and economics. In P. Cleveland et al. (Eds.), The economics of nature and the nature of economics. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, G. C., et al. (1996). Managing earth’s life support systems: The game, the players, and getting everyone to play. Ecological Applications, 6, 19–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkman, S. (1998). Vers une écologie industrialle. Paris: Editions Charles Léopold Mayer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkman, S. (2002). The recent history of industrial ecology. In R. Ayres & L. Ayres (Eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., & Constanza, R. (2002). Envisioning shared goals for humanity: A detailed, shared vision of a sustainable USA in 2100. Ecological Economics, 43, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, E. (1996). The way: An ecological world view (Rev. and enlarged ed.). Devon, England: Themis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J. M. (1999). Hierarchies in human affairs: Microfoundations of environmental sustainability. In J. Kohn et al. (Eds.), Sustainability in question. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P., et al. (1999). Natural capitalism. London: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, C., & Pepper, J. (2000). Sustainability through the market. Seven keys for success. Conches-Geneva: WBCSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • IETC (International Environmental Technology Center). (2003). Environmentally sound technologies for sustainable development. Paris: PNUMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, A. M., & Jansson, B. O. (1994). Ecosystems properties as a basis for sustainability. In A. M. Jansson (Ed.), Investing in natural capital. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keijzers, G. (2002, August). The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. H. (2000). Community ecology in a changing world. Germany: Ecology Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S. A. (2000). Fragile dominion: Complexity and the commons. Cambridge: MM, Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1998). The symbiotic planet. London: Science Masters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matutinovic, I. (2002). Organizational patterns of economies: an ecological perspective. Ecological Economics, 40(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA-CF. (2006). MA conceptual framework. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA-SB (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2006). Natural assets and human well-being (statement from the board). In Millennium ecosystem assessment. Nueva York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA-SDM. (2006). Summary for decision makers. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P. (1992). Ecología: Bases Científicas para un nuevo paradigma. Barcelona: Vedrá.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, G. (1998). Upsizing. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C., y Staudinger, M. (2002). Evolution, variability y sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development. World Ecology, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C., & Staudinger, M. (2004). The bridge between diversity and adaptivity: Answering McIntosh and Jeffrey. International Journal of Sustainable Development. World Ecology, 11(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P., et al. (2002). Great transition. The promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm: Environmental Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring, I. (1997). Evolutionary strategies in environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 23(3), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, J. (1999). The value of economic reasoning. Ecological Economics, 31, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD (Business Council for Sustainable Development). (2001). Sustainability through the market. Seven keys to success. Geneva: WBCSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott. (2002). The pragmatic and promise of theoretical environmental ethics: Forging a new discourse. Environmental values, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling. (1993). New science and new investments for sustainable biosphere. In A. M. Janson et al. (Eds.), Investing in natural capital. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley, F., et al. (2002). Why systems of people and natures are not just social and environmental systems. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. London: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, J. (1999a). Organizing diversity. In J. Khon et al. (Eds.), Sustainability in question. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J. (2004). Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model: Strategic applications of industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weizsacker, E. U., et al. (2004). Factor 4 (Informe del Club de Roma). Barcelona: Galaxia Gutermberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, et al. (1999). Information tool for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. EEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. P., & Sarmiento, F. O. (1998). Ecología: el puente entre ciencia y sostenibilidad. México D.F: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J., & Lorek, S. (2002). Environmentally sustainable household consumption: From aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecological Economics, 43, 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry. Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Quill/William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bermejo, R. (2014). Sustainability of Social-Economical Systems. In: Handbook for a Sustainable Economy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8981-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics