Abstract
The governmental institutions declare more and more frequently that its policies have the aim of reaching sustainability. But this concept is systematically being manipulated (the sustainable development alike) by the cores of power, with the aim of removing its capacity of transformation, because they want to develop a free market economy and this is main reason of our process of collision with nature. And, as a result, there is a permanent growth in the consumption of materials and energy, the land is being sealed with an increased pace, and the biodiversity loss is mounting. For that reason there is a growing need of showing clearly where the manipulations are and of determining as precisely as possible what sustainability means. The focal point to know what sustainability means is the fact that being human species part of the biosphere, our economy has to be a sub-system of general economy of materials and energy of nature. So the socio-economical systems have to imitate nature and this means that we must deduct the guiding principles of sustainability from the ecosystems behaviour. There is a growing consensus on the necessity to shut the materials cycles and to use solar energy. But in not enough, we must know the parameters which make possible such aims. And the dynamic of the prevailing economic system run against them. On the contrary, in order to reach the former aims of sustainability we have to mimic the other aspects of the ecosystems behaviour, like evolution, diversity, decentralization, self-organization, self-sufficiency and so on.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abel, T., & Stepp, J. R. (2003). A new ecosystems ecology for anthropology. Conservation Ecology, 7(3), 12.
Brown, L. R. (2001). Eco-economy. Building an economy for the earth. New York: Earth Policy Institute/Norton.
Cantlon, J. E., & Koening, H. E. (1999). Sustainable ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 31, 107–121.
Christensen, P. P. (2001). Early links between sciences of nature and economics. In P. Cleveland et al. (Eds.), The economics of nature and the nature of economics. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.
Daily, G. C., et al. (1996). Managing earth’s life support systems: The game, the players, and getting everyone to play. Ecological Applications, 6, 19–20.
Erkman, S. (1998). Vers une écologie industrialle. Paris: Editions Charles Léopold Mayer.
Erkman, S. (2002). The recent history of industrial ecology. In R. Ayres & L. Ayres (Eds.), A handbook of industrial ecology. London: Edward Elgar.
Farley, J., & Constanza, R. (2002). Envisioning shared goals for humanity: A detailed, shared vision of a sustainable USA in 2100. Ecological Economics, 43, 245–259.
Goldsmith, E. (1996). The way: An ecological world view (Rev. and enlarged ed.). Devon, England: Themis Books.
Gowdy, J. M. (1999). Hierarchies in human affairs: Microfoundations of environmental sustainability. In J. Kohn et al. (Eds.), Sustainability in question. London: Edward Elgar.
Hawken, P., et al. (1999). Natural capitalism. London: Little, Brown and Company.
Holliday, C., & Pepper, J. (2000). Sustainability through the market. Seven keys for success. Conches-Geneva: WBCSD.
IETC (International Environmental Technology Center). (2003). Environmentally sound technologies for sustainable development. Paris: PNUMA.
Jansson, A. M., & Jansson, B. O. (1994). Ecosystems properties as a basis for sustainability. In A. M. Jansson (Ed.), Investing in natural capital. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Keijzers, G. (2002, August). The transition to the sustainable enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production
Lawton, J. H. (2000). Community ecology in a changing world. Germany: Ecology Institute.
Levin, S. A. (2000). Fragile dominion: Complexity and the commons. Cambridge: MM, Perseus.
Margulis, L. (1998). The symbiotic planet. London: Science Masters.
Matutinovic, I. (2002). Organizational patterns of economies: an ecological perspective. Ecological Economics, 40(3), 421–440.
MEA-CF. (2006). MA conceptual framework. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. New York: United Nations.
MEA-SB (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). (2006). Natural assets and human well-being (statement from the board). In Millennium ecosystem assessment. Nueva York: United Nations.
MEA-SDM. (2006). Summary for decision makers. In Millennium ecosystem assessment. New York: United Nations.
Odum, E. P. (1992). Ecología: Bases Científicas para un nuevo paradigma. Barcelona: Vedrá.
Pauli, G. (1998). Upsizing. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Rammel, C., y Staudinger, M. (2002). Evolution, variability y sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development. World Ecology, 9.
Rammel, C., & Staudinger, M. (2004). The bridge between diversity and adaptivity: Answering McIntosh and Jeffrey. International Journal of Sustainable Development. World Ecology, 11(1), 9–23.
Raskin, P., et al. (2002). Great transition. The promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm: Environmental Institute.
Ring, I. (1997). Evolutionary strategies in environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 23(3), 237–250.
Schutz, J. (1999). The value of economic reasoning. Ecological Economics, 31, 23–29.
WBCSD (Business Council for Sustainable Development). (2001). Sustainability through the market. Seven keys to success. Geneva: WBCSD.
Callicott. (2002). The pragmatic and promise of theoretical environmental ethics: Forging a new discourse. Environmental values, 11.
Holling. (1993). New science and new investments for sustainable biosphere. In A. M. Janson et al. (Eds.), Investing in natural capital. Washington: Island Press.
Westley, F., et al. (2002). Why systems of people and natures are not just social and environmental systems. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. London: Island Press.
Schutz, J. (1999a). Organizing diversity. In J. Khon et al. (Eds.), Sustainability in question. London: Edward Elgar.
Korhonen, J. (2004). Industrial ecology in the strategic sustainable development model: Strategic applications of industrial ecology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12.
Weizsacker, E. U., et al. (2004). Factor 4 (Informe del Club de Roma). Barcelona: Galaxia Gutermberg.
Funtowicz, et al. (1999). Information tool for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. EEA.
Odum, E. P., & Sarmiento, F. O. (1998). Ecología: el puente entre ciencia y sostenibilidad. México D.F: McGraw-Hill Interamericana.
Spangenberg, J., & Lorek, S. (2002). Environmentally sustainable household consumption: From aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecological Economics, 43, 127–140.
Benyus, J. (1997). Biomimicry. Innovation inspired by nature. New York: Quill/William Morrow.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bermejo, R. (2014). Sustainability of Social-Economical Systems. In: Handbook for a Sustainable Economy. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8981-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8981-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8980-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8981-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)