Abstract
In this chapter, I will discuss the role of economics in models of the global environment used to support international policies aimed at sustainable development. Such models are now commonly referred to as integrated assessment models. Following Parson (1995) “The two defining characteristics [of integrated assessment] are a) that it seeks to provide information of use to some significant decision-maker rather than merely advancing understanding for its own sake; and b) that it brings together a broader set of areas, methods, styles of study, or degrees of certainty, than would typically characterize a study of the same issue within the bounds of a single research discipline.” The word ‘integrated’ thus conveys a message of multi-or interdisciplinarity. The word ‘assessment’ conveys a message of policy relevance (Rotmans et al., 1996; Weyant et al., 1996).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amano, A. (1996) CO2 emissions in the Asian region and the secondary benefits of their limitation, in Amano, A. (ed.) Global Warming, Carbon Limitation and Economic Development, Center for Global Environmental Research, Tsukuba.
Barker, T. (1993) Secondary Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Abatement: The Effect of a UK Carbon) Energy Tax on Air Pollution, Discussion Paper 4, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
Charlson, R.J. et al. (1992) Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430.
Collard, D. (1988) Catastrophic risk, or: the economics of being scared, in Collard, D., D.W. Pearce and D. Ulph (eds.) Economics, Growth and Sustainable Environments: Essays in Memory of Richard Lecomber, MacMillan, New York.
Ekins, P. (1996) The secondary benefits of CO2 abatement: how much emission reduction do they justify?, Ecological Economics, 16, 13–24.
Eykmans, J., S. Proost and E. Schokkaert (1993) Efficiency and distribution in greenhouse negotiations, Kyklos, 46, 363–398.
Fankhauser, S. (1995) Valuing Climate Change — The Economics of the Greenhouse, EarthScan, London. Fankhauser, S. and S. Kverndokk (1996) The global warming game simulations of a CO2reduction agreement, Resource and Energy Economics, 18, 83–102.
Fisher, B.S. et al. (1996) An economic assessment of policy instruments to combat climate change, in Bruce, J.P., H. Lee and E.F. Haites (eds.) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Grubb, M. (1996) Technologies, Energy Systems, and the Timing of CO 2 Emissions Abatement: An Overview of Economic Issues (draft).
Grubb, M., M. Ha Duong and T. Chapuis (1995) The economics of changing course, Energy Policy, 23, 417–432.
Ha Duong, M., M. Grubb and J.C. Hourcade (1996) Optimal Emission Paths Towards CO 2 Stabilisation and the Cost of Deferring Abatement: The Influence of Inertia and Uncertainty (draft).
Heintz, R.J. and R.S.J. Tol (1995) Joint implementation and uniform mixing, Energy Policy, 23, 911–917.
Heintz, R.J. and R.S.J. Tol (1996a) Schone lucht: de vergeten baten van klimaatbeleid implicaties voor joint implementation, Milieu, Tijdschrift voor Milieukunde, 11, 192–198.
Heintz, R.J. and R.S.J. Tol (1996b) Secondary Benefits of Climate Control Policies: Implications for the Global Environment Facility, GEC 9617, University College London and University of East Anglia, London and Norwich.
Hoel, M. (1991) Global environmental problems: the effects of unilateral actions taken by one country, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20, 55–70.
Hourcade, J.C. and F. Lecocq (1996) Costs of Inertia, Nature and Timing of Decisions: Some Lessons from Numerical Experiments with STARTS (draft).
Hourcade, J.C. et al. (1996) A review of mitigation cost studies, in Bruce, J.P., H. Lee and E.F. Haites (eds.) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kolstad, C.D. (1994) George Bush versus Al Gore — irreversibilities in greenhouse gas accumulation and emission control investment, Energy Policy, 22, 772–778.
Kolstad, C.D. (1996) Learning and stock effects in environmental regulations: the case of greenhouse gas emissions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 1–18.
Leimbach, M. (1996) Development of a fuzzy optimization model, supporting global warming decisionmaking, Environmental and Resource Economics, 7, 163–192.
Lempert, R.J., M.E. Schlesinger and S.C. Bankes (1996) When we don’t know the costs or the benefits: adaptive strategies for abating climate change, Climatic Change, 33, 235–274.
Manne, A.S. and R.G. Richels (1992) Buying Greenhouse Insurance — The Economic Costs of CO 2 Emission Limits, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Manne, A.S. and R.G. Richels (1995) The greenhouse debate: economic efficiency, burden sharing and hedging strategies, Energy Journal, 16, 1–37.
Manne, A.S., R. Mendelsohn and R.G. Richels (1995) MERGE — a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies, Energy Policy, 23, 17–34.
Nordhaus, W.D. (1991) To slow or not to slow: the economics of the greenhouse effect, Economic Journal, 101, 920–937.
Nordhaus, W.D. (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases, Science, 258, 1315–1319.
Nordhaus, W.D. (1994) Managing the Global Commons: The Economics of Climate Change,MIT Press, Cambridge.
Nordhaus, W.D. and D. Popp (1997) What is the value of scientific knowledge? An application to global warming using the PRICE model, Energy Journal, 18, 1–45.
Nordhaus, W.D. and Z. Yang (1996) RICE: A regional dynamic general equilibrium model of optimal climatechange policy, American Economic Review, 86, 741–765.
Parson, E.A. (1995) Integrated assessment and environmental policy making, Energy Policy, 23, 463–475.
Pearce, D.W. (1996) The social costs of climate change: greenhouse damage and the benefits of control, in Bruce, J.P., H. Lee and E.F. Haites (eds.) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Peck, S.C. and T.J. Teisberg (1991) CETA: a model for carbon emissions trajectory assessment, Energy Journal, 13, 55–77.
Peck, S.C. and T.J. Teisberg (1993a) Global warming uncertainties and the value of information: an analysis using CETA, Resource and Energy Economics, 15, 71–97.
Peck, S.C. and T.J. Teisberg (1993b) CO2 emissions control–comparing policy instruments, Energy Policy, 15, 222–230.
Peck, S.C. and T.J. Teisberg (1994) Optimal carbon emissions trajectories when damages depend on the rate or level of global warming, Climatic Change, 28, 289–314.
Peck, S.C. and T.J. Teisberg (1995) Optimal CO2 control policy with stochastic losses from temperature rise, Climatic Change, 31, 19–34.
Riche’s, R.G., J.A. Edmonds, H. Gruenspecht and T.M.L. Wigley (1996) The Berlin Mandate: The Design of CostEffective Mitigation Strategies (draft).
Rotmans, J., H. Dowlatabadi, J.A. Filar and E.A. Parson (1996) Integrated assessment of climate change: evaluation of methods and strategies, in S. Rayner, ed. Human Choices and Climate Change: A State of the Art Report, Batelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Washington, D.C.
Tol, R.S.J. (1995) The damage costs of climate change toward more comprehensive calculations, Environmental and Resource Economics, 5, 353–374.
Tol, R.S.J. (1996) The damage costs of climate change towards a dynamic representation, Ecological Economics, 19, 67–90.
Tol, R.S.J. (1997a) A DecisionAnalytic Treatise of the Enhanced Greenhouse Effect, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Tol, R.S.J. (1998) On the Difference in Impact of Two Almost Identical Climate Change Scenarios, Energy Policy, 26 (1), 13–20.
Tol, R.S.J., T. Van der Burg, H.M.A. Jansen and H. Verbruggen (1995) The Climate Fund- Some Notions on the Socioeconomic Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Emission Reduction in an International Context, R95/03, Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
Ulph, A. and D. Maddison (1995) Uncertainty, Learning and International Environmental Policy Coordination, Environmental and Resource Economics, 9, 451–466.
Ulph, A. and D. Ulph (1996) Who gains from learning about global warming?, in E.C. Van Ierland and K. Gorka (eds.) Economics of Atmospheric Pollution, Springer, Berlin.
Van Asselt, M.B.A., A.H.W. Beusen and H.B.M. Hilderink (1996) Uncertainty in integrated assessment: a social scientific perspective, Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 1, 71–90.
Weyant, J. et al. (1996) Integrated assessment of climate change: an overview and comparison of approaches and results, in Bruce, J.P., H. Lee and E.F. Haites (eds.) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wigley, T.M.L. (1991) Could reducing fossilfuel emissions cause global warming, Nature, 349, 503–506.
Wigley, T.M.L., R.G. Richels and J.A. Edmonds (1996) Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, Nature, 379, 240–243.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tol, R.S.J. (1998). Economic aspects of global environmental models. In: van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., Hofkes, M.W. (eds) Theory and Implementation of Economic Models for Sustainable Development. Economy & Environment, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3511-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3511-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5014-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3511-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive