Skip to main content

Actio, Passio et Creatio in the Endliche und Ewige Philosophie of Edith Stein

A Poetico-Personal Response to the Challenges of Postmodernity

  • Chapter
  • 178 Accesses

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 52))

Abstract

What Jean-François Lyotard essentially expresses about the phenomenon called postmodernity is a temporal sense of “loosening”. This “loosening” or “slackening” is liberating in that it frees the individual from rigid pre-established rules governing various forms of thinking. There is a sense that human thinking is transcendent, a sort of itérabilité, in that it cannot be contained by the contrived universal categories of critical judgement of the Academy. “Un artiste, un écrivain postmoderne est dans la situation d’un philosophe: le texte qu’il écrit, l’oeuvre qu’il accomplit ne sont pas en principe gouvernés par des règles déjà établies, et ils ne peuvent pas être jugés au moyen d’un jugement déterminant, par l’application à ce texte, à cette oeuvre de catégories connues”.1 With the rejection of rigid systems of determination, the subject is free to actualise its unique difference. Concomitant with this loosening of the rules of subjective determination, there is also the loss or slackening of the possibility of any foundational ground in which one can root one’s common experience of subjectivity. Lyotard expresses this reality when he proclaims the death of all grand narratives. In phenomenological terms, Lyotard’s insights render the grounding of Einfühlung (a common feeling of oneness) a near impossibility. The subject, in his or her difference, is rendered isolated or cut off from the larger community, despite Lyotard’s appeal for smaller communities of difference. Postmodernity, in emphasising difference, has rendered difference a universal logical category which has eclipsed the grand narrative of the being of the human person.

Nous sommes dans un moment de relâchement, je parle de la couleur du temps ...

Sous la demande générale de relâchement et d’apaisement, nous entendons marmonner le desir de recommencer la terreur, d’accomplir le fantasme d’étreindre la réalité. La réponse est: guerre au tout, témoignons de l’imprésentable, actuons les différends, sauvons l’honneur du nom.

Jean-François Lyotard, Le Postmoderne expliqué aux enfants, Editions Galilée, Paris, 1988, pp. 9–27.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Lyotard, Le Postmoderne expliqué aux enfants, pp. 26–27. Hereafter referred to as Lyotard. Paris: Editions Galilée, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Jean-François Lyotard’s L’Enthousiasme. Paris: Editions Galilée, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edith Stein,“Endliches und ewiges Sein”, in Werke,vol. II, E. Nauwelaerts, Louvain, 1950, p. 35. Hereafter cited as EES.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diese Seinsgewißheit ist eine `unreflektierte’ Gewißheit, d.h. sie liegt vor allem ‘ruck-gewandten’ Denken, mit dem der Geist aus der ursprünglichen Haltung seines den Gegenständen zugewandten Lebens heraustritt, um auf sich selbst hinzublicken. Versenkt sich aber der Geist in solcher Rückwendung in die einfache Tatsache seines Seins, so wird sie ihm zu einer drei-fachen Frage: Was ist das Sein, dessen ich inne bin? Was ist das Ich, das seines Seins inne ist? Was ist die geistige Regung, in der ich bin und mir meiner und ihrer bewußt bin?“ EES, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Die Angst ist freilich durchschnittlich nicht das beherrschende Lebensgefühl. Sie wird es in Fäen, die wir als krankhaft bezeichnen, aber normalerweise wandeln wir in einer großen Sicherheit, als sei unser Sein ein fester Besitz“. EES, pp. 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. We must realise that freedom or liberty is not to be understood in the tradition of German idealism as a fir sich,but as conditioned by interior and exterior forces. Stein is very conscious of the possibility of living under circumstances which inhibit the full realisation to auto-determine oneself. Stein develops this idea in her treatment of the state. For further information on this subject the reader is encouraged to consult Stein’s Ober den Staat in Jarbuch für Philosophie and phenomenologische Forschung 7 (1925), 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calcagno, A. (1998). Actio, Passio et Creatio in the Endliche und Ewige Philosophie of Edith Stein. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) Phenomenology of Life and the Human Creative Condition. Analecta Husserliana, vol 52. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2604-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2604-7_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4805-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2604-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics