Abstract
Carl Stumpf was Brentano’s “oldest pupil”,1 for he began attending lectures of his mentor before any of the other Brentanists. He was already studying law in Würzburg (not because a career in this area interested him, but rather because it would allow him the leisure to occupy himself with music) when a transformation was initiated by Brentano’s defense of a number of theses for the sake of habilitation in 1866. Stumpf describes the impression which Brentano then made on him as follows:
Everything folded before the great tasks of philosophical and religious rebirth. Sharp thinking was in fact not my inclination until then; on the contrary, it was rather unpleasant to me. Only Brentano’s iron discipline made the need for logical clarity and consistency second nature. [ ... ] The thesis which he defended in his habilitation, that the true philosophical method is none other than the one of natural science, was and remained for me a guiding star.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rollinger, R.D. (1999). Husserl and Stumpf. In: Husserl’s Position in the School of Brentano. Phaenomenologica, vol 150. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1808-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1808-0_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5208-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1808-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive