Skip to main content

The Use of the Action-Research Methodology in the Development of Business Education a Case Study

  • Chapter
  • 90 Accesses

Part of the book series: Educational Innovation in Economics and Business ((EIEB,volume 6))

Abstract

This paper discusses the use of the action-research methodology in the classroom to help improve the academic environment. Action-research appears to have grown in popularity with academics generally, and in educational research particularly, over the past few years. In this paper action-research is defined, and a critique and counter-critique are provided. I explain how I have found it useful as an agent for change in my teaching environment. Difficulties, which attach to the use of the action-research methodology, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altrichter, H., Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1989). Defining, confining or refining action research? In O. Zuber-Skerritt, (Eds.), Proceedings of the first world congress on action research, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, J. (1972). The teacher as researcher. Hard Cheese No. I, Goldsmiths College, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste, translated by R. Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. Victoria: Deak in University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.F., & Elden, M. (1993). Features on emerging action research. Human Relations, 46 (2), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., & G. Marcus, (Eds.), (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1982). Action-research: A framework for self-evaluation in schools. Working Paper No. 1. Teacher-pupil interaction and the quality of learning. London: Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. (1986). Critical Theory and education. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Greenwood, D.J., Whyte, W.F., & Harkavy, I. (1993). Participatory action research as a process and as a goal. Human Relations, 46 (2), 175–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action: (Volume I). Cambridge: Polity Press. First published as Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Kelly, M. (1993). Improving teaching through action research. Campbelltown: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner, 3rd edition. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R. (1995). Empirical research in accounting: Alternative approaches and a case for middle-range thinking. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8 (1), 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, G.E., & Mohran, S.A. (1993). Looking backward and forward at action research. Human Relations, 46 (11), 1349–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1952). Group decisions and social change. In G.E. Swanson, T.M. Newcomb, & F.E. Hartley, (Eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J. (1988). Action research - Principles and Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I., & Mason, R.O. (1981). Creating a dialectic social science. Dordrecht: Reidel. Stenhouse, L. (1980). Curriculum research and development. Heinemann: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W.F. (1990). Participatory action research. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Professional development in higher education. Kogan Page: London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelly, M. (2002). The Use of the Action-Research Methodology in the Development of Business Education a Case Study. In: Johannessen, T.A., Pedersen, A., Petersen, K. (eds) Educational Innovation in Economics and Business VI. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1390-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1390-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5959-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1390-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics