Abstract
The practical approach in LES is concerned with modelling the effective “subgrid-scale” stress due to the projection from the complete u i field to the incomplete ũ i field: a non-regular operation, the effect of which must be modelled. On the other hand, the mathematical approach usually assumes a regular explicit filter: a regular convolution acting on u i to produce ū i , leading to an effective “filtered-scale” stress. On can also consider practical LES with regular filtering added to the projection, thus solving for \({\bar \tilde u_i}\) instead of ũ i . The effective stress is then the sum of a filtered-scale stress (that can be reconstructed) and a subgrid-scale stress (that must be modelled). A view that reconciles both practical approaches is reviewed, together with some models. Of particular interest are models that behave as viscosity at low k and higher order viscosity at high k. The spectral behavior of the models is investigated numerically, in 483 LES of decaying isotropic turbulence (started from 2563 DNS). Two diagnostics are used: model dissipation spectrum and obtained energy spectrum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Carati, G. S. Winckelmans, and H. Jeanmart, “On the modelling of the subgrid-scale and filtered-scale stress tensors in large-eddy simulation,” to appear in J. Fluid Mech in Augst 2001.
G. S. Winckelmans, A. A. Wray, O. V. Vasilyev and H. Jeanmart, “Explicit-filtering large-eddy simulation using the tensor-diffusivity model supplemented by a dynamic Smagorinsky term,” Phys. Fluids 13 (5); 1385–1403 (2001).
W. K. Yeo, and K. W. Bedford, “Closure-free turbulence modeling based upon a conjuctive higher order averaging procedure,” in Computational Methods in Flow Analysis, Ed. H. Niki and M. Kawahara, Okayama University of Science, 844–851 (1988)
K. W. Bedford, and W. K. Yeo, “Conjunctive filtering procedures in surface water flow and transport,” in Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows, Ed. B. Galperin & S. A. Orszag, Cambridge University Press, 513–537 (1993).
A. Leonard, “Large-eddy simulation of chaotic convection and beyond,” 35th Aerospaces Sciences Meeting e4 Exhibit, Jan. 6–10, 1997, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 97–0204.
A. Leonard, “Energy cascade in large-eddy simulations of turbulent fluid flows,” Adv. Geophys.18: 237 (1974).
D. Carati, G. S. Winckelmans, and H. Jeanmart. Jeanmart, “Exact expansions for filtered-scales modelling with a wide class of LES filters,” Proc. Isaac Newton Institute Symposium / ERCOFTAC Workshop, Cambridge, UK, May 12–14 1999; in ERCOFTAC Series: Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation III: 213–224, ed. P. R. Voke, N. D. Sandham and L. Kleiser, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1999).
J. Bardina, J. H. Ferziger, and W. C. Reynolds, “Improved turbulence models based on large eddy simulation of homogeneous incompressible turbulence,” Thermosciences Div., Mech. Eng. Dept., Stanford University, Report TF-19 (1983).
B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, “Large-eddy simulation of the temporal mixing layer using the mixed Clark model,” Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynamics 8: 309–324 (1996).
K. Horiuti, “A new dynamic two-parameter mixed model for large-eddy simulation,” Phys. Fluids 9 (11): 3443–3464 (1997).
S. Stolz, and N A Adams, “An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation,” Phys. Fluids 11: 1699–1701 (1999).
S. Stolz, and N. A. Adams, and L. Kleiser. Kleiser, “An approximate deconvolution model for large-eddy simulation with application to incompressible wall-bounded flows,” Phys. Fluids 13 (4): 997–1015 (2001).
B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, “Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent mixing layer,” J. Fluid Mech. 339: 357–390 (1997).
M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. Cabot, “A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy-viscosity model,” Phys. Fluids A 3 (7): 1760–65 (1991).
S. Ghosal, T. S. Lund, P. Moin, and K. Akselvoll, “A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 286: 229255 (1995).
R. H. Kraichnan, “Eddy viscosoty in two and three dimensions,” J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 1521–1536 (1976).
J.-P. Chollet and M. Lesieur, “Parameterization of small scales of three-dimensional isotropic turbulence utilizing spectral closures,” J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 2747–2757 (1981).
J.-P. Chollet, “Two-point closure used for a sub-grid scale model in large eddy simulations,” in Turbulent Shear Flows 4 (ed. L.J.S. Bradbury et al.): 62–72 (1985).
O. Métais and M. Lesieur, “Spectral large-eddy simulation of isotropic and stably stratified turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 239: 157–194 (1992).
J. Smagorinsky, “General circulation experiments with the primitive equations,” Mon. Weather Rev. 91: 99–164 (1963).
R. A. Clark, J. H. Ferziger, and W. C. Reynolds, “Evaluation of subgrid-scale turbulence models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 91 (1): 1–16 (1979).
G. S. Winckelmans, T. S. Lund, D. Carati, and A. A. Wray, “A priori testing of subgrid-scale models in the velocity-pressure and the vorticity-velocity formulations,” Proc. Summer Program, Center for Turbulence Research (Stanford University and NASA Ames), 309–328 (1996).
D. Carati, K. Jansen, and T. Lund, “A family of dynamic models for large-eddy simulation,” in Annu. Res. Briefs,Center for Turbulence Research (Stanford University and NASA Ames), 35–40 (1995).
G. Dantinne, H. Jeanmart, G. S. Winckelmans, V. Legat, and D. Carati, “Hyperviscosity and vorticity-based models for subgrid scale modeling,” Applied Scientific Research 59: 409–420 (1998).
T. J.R. Hughes, L. Mazzei, A. A. Oberai, and A. A. Wray, “The multiscale formulation of large eddy simulation: Decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence,” Phys. Fluids 13 (2): 505–512 (2001).
T. J.R. Hughes, A. A. Oberai, and L. Mazzei, “Large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flow by the variational multiscale method,” Phys. Fluids 13 (6): 1784–1799 (2001).
M. Lesieur, and O. Métais, “New trends in large-eddy simulation of turbulence,” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 28: 45–82 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winckelmans, G.S., Jeanmart, H. (2001). Assessment of Some Models for LES without/with Explicit Filtering. In: Geurts, B.J., Friedrich, R., Métais, O. (eds) Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation IV. ERCOFTAC Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1263-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1263-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5893-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1263-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive