Skip to main content

A Graphical Notation for Mixed-Initiative Dialogue with Generative Design Systems

  • Chapter
Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02

Abstract

In generative design systems, the interaction between the designer and the generative formalism is typically transactional. The system responds to a single query or utterance with one or more results defining the transaction. A neat conceptual separation exists between user tasks and system tasks, rendering the modelling of joint responsibility for generation difficult. To address this problem, a robust basis for combining design interaction with automated or intelligent systems is necessary. We propose a mixed-initiative model of interaction that support forms of dialogue where both the designer and the formalism share responsibility over the same task. Mixed-initiative enables the role of both user and formalism to be integrated into an incremental model of transaction, where the user and the formalism can share and input data through a common shared resource, on a common shared task. In this paper, we report on the development of a shared graphical notation to support mixed-initiative dialogue situations in generative design systems. We demonstrate the use of this notation in design space exploration and discuss its implications for interaction with generative design systems based on our ongoing work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, JF: 1999, Mixed initiative interaction, IEEE Intelligent Systems 14 (6): 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amant, RS and Cohen PR: 1997, Interaction with a mixed-initiative system for exploratory data analysis, Proceedings of Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrow, AL: 1999, Computational Design and Formal Languages, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science. Adelaide University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, M and McDermott, D: 1996, Cognitive technology: in search of a humane interface, Issues in the Development of Human-Computer Mixed-Initiative Planning, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 285–303.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, B: 1992, The Logic of Typed Feature Structures with Applications to Unification Grammars, Logic Programs and Constraint Resolution, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, SF: 1998, Supporting Information Navigation in Generative Design Systems, Ph.D. thesis, School of Architecture, Carnegie-Mellon University, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien, SF and Flemming, U: 1996, Design space navigation: an annotated bibliography, Technical Report EDRC 48–37–96, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, PR, et al.: 1997, QuickSet: Multi-modal interaction for distributed applications, Proceedings of the Fifth International Multimedia Conference, ACM Press, pp. 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G and Allen, JF: 1994, Arguing about plans: plan representation and reasoning for mixed-initiative planning, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on AI Planning Systems Chicago, IL, pp. 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, G and Allen, J and Miller, B: 1996, TRAINS-95: Towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on AI Planning Systems, Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinn, C: 1993, A computational model of dialogue initiative in collaborative discourse, AAA193 Fall Symposium on Human-Computer Collaboration, Raleigh, NC, pp. 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartrum, T and DeLoach, SA: 1999, Design Issues for Mixed-Initiative Agent Systems. In: Proceedings of the AAAI-99 Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligence. Orlando FI, pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M, et al.: 1997, Unification-based Multimodal Integration, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, Spain, pp. 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, B and Fettig, T: 1995, FEGRAMED: An interactive graphics editor for feature structures. Research Report RR-95–06, German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Saarbrucken, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, C and Sidner, CL: 1997, COLLAGEN: When agents collaborate with people, in WL Johnson and B Hayes-Roth (eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents’97), ACM Press, New York, pp. 284–291.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, C and Sidner, CL: 1998, COLLAGEN: A collaboration manager for software interface agents, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 8 (3–4): 315–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, C: 1997, Oz explorer: a visual constraint programming tool, in L. Naish (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Logic Programming, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 286–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecuci, GM and Boicu, KW and Lee, S: 1999, Mixed-initiative development of knowledge bases, Proceedings of the AAAI-99 Workshop on Mixed-Initiative Intelligence. Orlando Fl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, R, Burrow, A, Datta, S and Chang, T: 1999, Typed feature structures and design space exploration, Artificial Intelligence in Design, Engineering and Manufacturing 13 (4): 287–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, RF and Burrow, AL: 1999, resolution and design space exploration, in C Eastman and G Augenbroe (eds), CAAD Futures’99: Computers in Building, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, A: 1997, Configuration Management with Version Sets - A Unified Software Versioning Model and its Applications, Ph.D thesis, TU Braunschweig.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, A and Snelting, G: 1995, Handling version sets through feature logic, in W Schfer and P.Botella (eds), Proceedings of the 5th European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC), Vol. 989 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Datta, S., Woodbury, R.F. (2002). A Graphical Notation for Mixed-Initiative Dialogue with Generative Design Systems. In: Gero, J.S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Design ’02. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0795-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6059-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0795-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics