Abstract
This chapter presents a broad survey of the cause-effect relation, with particular emphasis on how the relation is expressed in text. Philosophers have been grappling with the concept of causation for centuries. Researchers in social psychology have found that the human mind has a very complex mechanism for identifying and attributing the cause for an event. Inferring cause-effect relations between events and statements has also been found to be an important part of reading and text comprehension, especially for narrative text. Though many of the cause-effect relations in text are implied and have to be inferred by the reader, there is also a wide variety of linguistic expressions for explicitly indicating cause and effect. In addition, it has been found that certain words have “causal valence”—they bias the reader to attribute cause in certain ways. Cause-effect relations can also be divided into several different types.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 261–277.
Alloy, L. B., & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112–149.
Altenberg, B. (1984). Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica, 38, 20–69.
Aristotle, H. (1996). Physics (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Artioli, E., Avanzolini, G., Martelli, L., & Ursino, M. (1996). An expert system based on causal knowledge: Validation on post-cardiosurgical patients. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 41, 19–37.
Au, T. K.-F. (1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The cause and consequences of interpersonal events implicit in language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 104–122.
Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics, 9, 223–250.
Bozsahin, H. C., & Findler, N. V. (1992). Memory-based hypothesis formation: Heuristic learning of commonsense causal relations from text. Cognitive Science, 16, 431–454.
Bree, D. S., Hogeveen, H., Schakenraad, M. H. W., Schreinemakers, J. F., & Tepp, D. M. (1995). Conditional causal modeling. Applied Articial Intelligence, 9, 181–212.
Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237–273.
Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 601–609.
Castillo, E., Cobo, A., Gutierrez, J. M., Iglesias, A., & Sagastegui, H. (1994). Causal network models in expert systems. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 9, 315–328.
Charlet, J., Reynaud, C., & Krivine, J.-P. (1996). Causal model—based knowledge acquisition tools: Discussion of experiments. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 44, 629–652.
Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382.
Corrigan, R. (1988). Who dun it? The influence of actor-patient animacy and type of verb in the making of causal attributions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 447–465.
Corrigan, R. (1992). The relationship between causal attributions and judgements of the typicality of events described by sentences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 351–368.
Corrigan, R. (1993). Causal attributions to the states and events encoded by different types of verbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 335–348.
Corrigan, R., & Stevenson, C. (1994). Children’s causal attribution to states and events described by different classes of verbs. Cognitive Development, 9, 235–256.
Cresswell, M. J. (1981). Adverbs of causation. In H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, 21–37. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 274–282.
Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H. (1975). Causal attributions for interpersonal events of varying magnitude. Journal of Personality, 43, 74–93.
Dancygier, B. (1993). Interpreting conditionals: Time, knowledge, and causation. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 403–434.
Dick, J. P. (1997). Modeling cause and effect in legal text. In D. Lukose, H. Delaguch, M. Keeler, L. Searle, & J. Sowa (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce’s Dream: Fifth International Conference on Conceptual structures, ICCS’97, 244–259.
Dirven, R. (1995). The construal of cause: The case of cause prepositions. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, 95–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dirven, R. (1997). Emotions as cause and the cause of emotions. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation, 55–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Downing, C. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Ross, B. H. (1985). Multicausal inference: Evaluation of evidence in causally complex situations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 239–263.
Eells, E. (1991). Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehring, D. (1997). Causation and Persistence: A Theory of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, J. B. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244.
Garcia, D. (1997). COATIS, an NLP system to locate expressions of actions connected by causality links. In E. Plaza & R. Benjamins (Eds.), Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management: 10th European Workshop, EKA W`97 Proceedings, 347–352.
Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459–464.
Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1974/1975). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3, 227–243.
Glyrnour, C., & Cooper, G. F. (Eds.). (1999). Computation, Causation, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (1991). A semantic account of resultatives. Linguistic Analysis, 21, 66–96.
Gonzalez, H., & Chang, P. S. (1997). Boiler tube failure root cause analysis advisory system. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, 201–205.
Grundspenkis, J. (1998). Causal domain model driven knowledge acquisition for expert diagnosis system development. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 547–558
Guha, R. V., & Lenat, D. B. (1990). Building Large Knowledge Based Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge—based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75–88.
Hilton, D. J., Jaspars, J. M. F. , & Clarke, D. D. (1990). Pragmatic conditional reasoning: Context and content effects on the interpretation of causal assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 791–812.
Hitchcock, C. R. (1998). Causal knowledge: That great guide of human life. Communication & Cognition, 31, 271–296.
Hume, D. (1965). An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature. Hamden, CT: Archon Books. (Original work published 1740).
Jaspars, J. (1983). The process of attribution in common-sense. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions, 28–44. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Jaspars, J., Hewstone, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1983). Attribution theory and research: The state of the art. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual, Developmental and Social Dimensions, 3–36. London: Academic Press.
Joskowsicz, L., Ksiezyk, T., & Grishman, R. (1989). Deep domain models for discourse analysis. In H. J. Antonisse, J. W. Benolt, & B. G. Silverman (Eds.), The Annual AI Systems in Government Conference, 195–200.
Kamerbeek, J. (1993). Generating simulators from causal process knowledge. Proceedings of the 1993 European Simulation Symposium, 579–584.
Kaplan, R. M., & Berry-Rogghe, G. (1991). Knowledge-based acquisition of causal relationships in text. Knowledge Acquisition, 3, 317–337.
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115–126.
Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
Khoo, C. S. G. (1995). Automatic identification of causal relations in text and their use for improving precision in information retrieval. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.
Khoo, C., Kornfilt, J., Oddy, R., & Myaeng, S. H. (1998). Automatic extraction of cause-effect information from newspaper text without knowledge-based inferencing. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 13, 177–186.
Khoo, C., Chan, S., & Niu, Y. (2000). Extracting causal knowledge from a medical database using graphical patterns. 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the Conference, 336–343.
Konolige, K. (1994). Using default and causal reasoning in diagnosis. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 11, 97–135.
Koons, R. C. (1998). Teleology as higher-order causation: A situation-theoretic account. Minds and Machines, 8, 559–585.
Kun, A., & Weiner, B. (1973). Necessary and sufficient causal schemata for success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 197–207.
Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ligeza, A., & Parra, P. F. (1997). And/or/not causal graphs—A model for diagnostic reasoning. Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 7, 185–203.
Longman dictionary ofcontemporary English (2nd ed.). (1987). Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackie, J. L. (1980). The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mellor, D. H. (1995). The Facts of Causation. London: Routledge.
Mill, J. S. (1973). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (J. M. Robson, Ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1843).
Mooney, R. J. (1990). Learning plan schemata from observation: Explanation-based learning for plan recognition. Cognitive Science, 14, 483–509.
Nayak, P. P., & Joskowicz, L. (1996). Efficient compositional modeling for generating causal explanations. Artificial Intelligence, 83, 193–227.
Omanson, R. C. (1982). The relation between centrality and story category variation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 326–337.
Rieger, C., & Grinberg, M. (1977). The declarative representation and simulation of causality in physical mechanisms. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Arti icial Intelligence, 250–256.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1979). Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 78–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Selfridge, M., Daniell, J., & Simmons, D. (1985). Learning causal models by understanding real-world natural language explanations. The Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications: The Engineering of Knowledge-Based Systems, 378–383.
Shultz, T. R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development , 47, 1–51.
Simpson, J. (1983). Resultatives. In L. Levin, M. Rappaport, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 143–157. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Szeto, Y.-K. (1988). The semantics of causative and agentive verbs. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa 16, 1–51.
Terenziani, P., & Torasso, P. (1995). Time, action-types, and causation: An integrated analysis. Computational Intelligence , 11, 529–552.
Thompson, J. J. (1987). Verbs of action. Synthese, 72, 103–122.
Trabasso, T., & Speny, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language , 24, 595–611.
Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language , 24, 612–630.
Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and Comprehension of Text , 83–111. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Van den Broek, P. W. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language , 27, 1–22.
Van den Broek, P. (1989). The effects of causal structure on the comprehension of narratives: Implications for education. Reading Psychology , 10, 19–44.
Van den Broek, P., Rohleder, L., & Narvaez, D. (1996). Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary texts. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, 179–200. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Van Overwalle, F. (1997). A test of the joint model of causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology ,27, 221–236.
Warren, W. H., Nicholas, D. W., & Trabasso, T. (1979). Event chains and inferences in understanding narratives. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. 2: New Directions in Discourse Processing , 23–52. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wattenmaker, W. D., Nakamura, G. V., & Medin, D. L. (1988). Relationships between similarity-based and explanation-based categorization. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary Science and Natural Explanation: Commonsense Conceptions of Causality, 204–240. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.
White, P.A. (1995). Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: Causal powers versus regularity-based accounts. Memory & Cognition, 23, 243–254.
Wojcik, R. H. (1973). The expression of causation in English clauses. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 386–397.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khoo, C., Chan, S., Niu, Y. (2002). The Many Facets of the Cause-Effect Relation. In: Green, R., Bean, C.A., Myaeng, S.H. (eds) The Semantics of Relationships. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0073-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0073-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5996-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0073-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive