Skip to main content

The Many Facets of the Cause-Effect Relation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Information Science and Knowledge Management ((ISKM,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter presents a broad survey of the cause-effect relation, with particular emphasis on how the relation is expressed in text. Philosophers have been grappling with the concept of causation for centuries. Researchers in social psychology have found that the human mind has a very complex mechanism for identifying and attributing the cause for an event. Inferring cause-effect relations between events and statements has also been found to be an important part of reading and text comprehension, especially for narrative text. Though many of the cause-effect relations in text are implied and have to be inferred by the reader, there is also a wide variety of linguistic expressions for explicitly indicating cause and effect. In addition, it has been found that certain words have “causal valence”—they bias the reader to attribute cause in certain ways. Cause-effect relations can also be divided into several different types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alloy, L. B., & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altenberg, B. (1984). Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica, 38, 20–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, H. (1996). Physics (R. Waterfield, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artioli, E., Avanzolini, G., Martelli, L., & Ursino, M. (1996). An expert system based on causal knowledge: Validation on post-cardiosurgical patients. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 41, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, T. K.-F. (1986). A verb is worth a thousand words: The cause and consequences of interpersonal events implicit in language. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. B., & Bower, G. H. (1980). Story understanding as problem solving. Poetics, 9, 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozsahin, H. C., & Findler, N. V. (1992). Memory-based hypothesis formation: Heuristic learning of commonsense causal relations from text. Cognitive Science, 16, 431–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bree, D. S., Hogeveen, H., Schakenraad, M. H. W., Schreinemakers, J. F., & Tepp, D. M. (1995). Conditional causal modeling. Applied Articial Intelligence, 9, 181–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Fish, D. (1983). The psychological causality implicit in language. Cognition, 14, 237–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Grober, E., Garvey, C., & Yates, J. (1977). Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 601–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, E., Cobo, A., Gutierrez, J. M., Iglesias, A., & Sagastegui, H. (1994). Causal network models in expert systems. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 9, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlet, J., Reynaud, C., & Krivine, J.-P. (1996). Causal model—based knowledge acquisition tools: Discussion of experiments. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies, 44, 629–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R. (1988). Who dun it? The influence of actor-patient animacy and type of verb in the making of causal attributions. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R. (1992). The relationship between causal attributions and judgements of the typicality of events described by sentences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R. (1993). Causal attributions to the states and events encoded by different types of verbs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, R., & Stevenson, C. (1994). Children’s causal attribution to states and events described by different classes of verbs. Cognitive Development, 9, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, M. J. (1981). Adverbs of causation. In H.-J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, 21–37. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D., Lubart, T., Alksnis, O., & Rist, R. (1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory & Cognition, 19, 274–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. D., & Kelley, H. H. (1975). Causal attributions for interpersonal events of varying magnitude. Journal of Personality, 43, 74–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dancygier, B. (1993). Interpreting conditionals: Time, knowledge, and causation. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 403–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, J. P. (1997). Modeling cause and effect in legal text. In D. Lukose, H. Delaguch, M. Keeler, L. Searle, & J. Sowa (Eds.), Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce’s Dream: Fifth International Conference on Conceptual structures, ICCS’97, 244–259.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dirven, R. (1995). The construal of cause: The case of cause prepositions. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, 95–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirven, R. (1997). Emotions as cause and the cause of emotions. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), The Language of Emotions: Conceptualization, Expression, and Theoretical Foundation, 55–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, C. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Ross, B. H. (1985). Multicausal inference: Evaluation of evidence in causally complex situations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eells, E. (1991). Probabilistic Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ehring, D. (1997). Causation and Persistence: A Theory of Causation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, C. R., & Bloom, J. B. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, D. (1997). COATIS, an NLP system to locate expressions of actions connected by causality links. In E. Plaza & R. Benjamins (Eds.), Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management: 10th European Workshop, EKA W`97 Proceedings, 347–352.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C., & Caramazza, A. (1974). Implicit causality in verbs. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, C., Caramazza, A., & Yates, J. (1974/1975). Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition, 3, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glyrnour, C., & Cooper, G. F. (Eds.). (1999). Computation, Causation, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E. (1991). A semantic account of resultatives. Linguistic Analysis, 21, 66–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, H., & Chang, P. S. (1997). Boiler tube failure root cause analysis advisory system. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Southeastern Symposium on System Theory, 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundspenkis, J. (1998). Causal domain model driven knowledge acquisition for expert diagnosis system development. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 547–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guha, R. V., & Lenat, D. B. (1990). Building Large Knowledge Based Systems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J., & Slugoski, B. R. (1986). Knowledge—based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, D. J., Jaspars, J. M. F. , & Clarke, D. D. (1990). Pragmatic conditional reasoning: Context and content effects on the interpretation of causal assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 791–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock, C. R. (1998). Causal knowledge: That great guide of human life. Communication & Cognition, 31, 271–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1965). An Abstract of a Treatise of Human Nature. Hamden, CT: Archon Books. (Original work published 1740).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspars, J. (1983). The process of attribution in common-sense. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution Theory: Social and Functional Extensions, 28–44. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspars, J., Hewstone, M., & Fincham, F. D. (1983). Attribution theory and research: The state of the art. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual, Developmental and Social Dimensions, 3–36. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joskowsicz, L., Ksiezyk, T., & Grishman, R. (1989). Deep domain models for discourse analysis. In H. J. Antonisse, J. W. Benolt, & B. G. Silverman (Eds.), The Annual AI Systems in Government Conference, 195–200.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kamerbeek, J. (1993). Generating simulators from causal process knowledge. Proceedings of the 1993 European Simulation Symposium, 579–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. M., & Berry-Rogghe, G. (1991). Knowledge-based acquisition of causal relationships in text. Knowledge Acquisition, 3, 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, C. S. G. (1995). Automatic identification of causal relations in text and their use for improving precision in information retrieval. Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, C., Kornfilt, J., Oddy, R., & Myaeng, S. H. (1998). Automatic extraction of cause-effect information from newspaper text without knowledge-based inferencing. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 13, 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, C., Chan, S., & Niu, Y. (2000). Extracting causal knowledge from a medical database using graphical patterns. 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Proceedings of the Conference, 336–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konolige, K. (1994). Using default and causal reasoning in diagnosis. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 11, 97–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koons, R. C. (1998). Teleology as higher-order causation: A situation-theoretic account. Minds and Machines, 8, 559–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kun, A., & Weiner, B. (1973). Necessary and sufficient causal schemata for success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ligeza, A., & Parra, P. F. (1997). And/or/not causal graphs—A model for diagnostic reasoning. Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 7, 185–203.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Longman dictionary ofcontemporary English (2nd ed.). (1987). Harlow, Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. (1980). The Cement of the Universe: A Study of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, D. H. (1995). The Facts of Causation. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1973). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (J. M. Robson, Ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1843).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, R. J. (1990). Learning plan schemata from observation: Explanation-based learning for plan recognition. Cognitive Science, 14, 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, P. P., & Joskowicz, L. (1996). Efficient compositional modeling for generating causal explanations. Artificial Intelligence, 83, 193–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omanson, R. C. (1982). The relation between centrality and story category variation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 326–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, C., & Grinberg, M. (1977). The declarative representation and simulation of causality in physical mechanisms. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Arti icial Intelligence, 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1979). Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 78–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selfridge, M., Daniell, J., & Simmons, D. (1985). Learning causal models by understanding real-world natural language explanations. The Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications: The Engineering of Knowledge-Based Systems, 378–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, T. R. (1982). Rules of causal attribution. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development , 47, 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. (1983). Resultatives. In L. Levin, M. Rappaport, & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional Grammar, 143–157. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szeto, Y.-K. (1988). The semantics of causative and agentive verbs. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa 16, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terenziani, P., & Torasso, P. (1995). Time, action-types, and causation: An integrated analysis. Computational Intelligence , 11, 529–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. J. (1987). Verbs of action. Synthese, 72, 103–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso, T., & Speny, L. L. (1985). Causal relatedness and importance of story events. Journal of Memory and Language , 24, 595–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso, T., & van den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language , 24, 612–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabasso, T., Secco, T., & van den Broek, P. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and Comprehension of Text , 83–111. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, P. W. (1988). The effects of causal relations and hierarchical position on the importance of story statements. Journal of Memory and Language , 27, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, P. (1989). The effects of causal structure on the comprehension of narratives: Implications for education. Reading Psychology , 10, 19–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Broek, P., Rohleder, L., & Narvaez, D. (1996). Causal inferences in the comprehension of literary texts. In R. J. Kreuz & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical Approaches to Literature and Aesthetics, 179–200. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle, F. (1997). A test of the joint model of causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology ,27, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, W. H., Nicholas, D. W., & Trabasso, T. (1979). Event chains and inferences in understanding narratives. In R. O. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. 2: New Directions in Discourse Processing , 23–52. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenmaker, W. D., Nakamura, G. V., & Medin, D. L. (1988). Relationships between similarity-based and explanation-based categorization. In D. J. Hilton (Ed.), Contemporary Science and Natural Explanation: Commonsense Conceptions of Causality, 204–240. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, P.A. (1995). Use of prior beliefs in the assignment of causal roles: Causal powers versus regularity-based accounts. Memory & Cognition, 23, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik, R. H. (1973). The expression of causation in English clauses. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 386–397.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khoo, C., Chan, S., Niu, Y. (2002). The Many Facets of the Cause-Effect Relation. In: Green, R., Bean, C.A., Myaeng, S.H. (eds) The Semantics of Relationships. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0073-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0073-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5996-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0073-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics