Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Prosody: Theory and Experiment pp 89–127Cite as

The Perception of Prosodic Prominence

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Text, Speech and Language Technology ((TLTB,volume 14))

Abstract

We say that a linguistic entity is prosodically prominent when it stands out from its environment by virtue of its prosodic characteristics. That is, we define prominence as a property of a linguistic entity relative to an entity or a set of entities in its environment. Although the definition is cast in relative terms, it includes monosyllabic utterances, because they stand out from silence. In the acoustic domain, the primary prosodic properties bringing about these relative differences are amplitude, duration and ‘F0’ (we use F0 as a shorthand form for the inverse of the quasi-periodicity of the speech signal). The corresponding perceptual properties are loudness, duration or length, and pitch. Also, particular aspects of timbre come into play, such as those relating to vowel reduction, spectral slope or tilt, etc., and properties relating to voice quality, e.g. creak.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Beckman, M.E. 1986. Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and Ayers, G. J. 1994. Guidelines for ToBI transcription. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Linguistics Department (available by ftp from kiwi.nmt.edu)

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and Edwards, J. 1994. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. In P.A. Keating (ed), Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Papers in Laboratory Phonology Ill. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge U.P., 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, M.E. and Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1986. Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. 1958 A Theory of Pitch Accent in English. Word 14, 109–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. 1961. Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. The Hague: Mouton. Bruce, G. 1977. Swedish Word Accents in Sentence Perspective. Lund: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. 1987. On the phonology and phonetics of rhythm: evidence from Swedish. In W.U. Dressler et al. (eds), Phonologica 1984. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, G. 1989. Report from the IPA Working Group on suprasegmental categories Working Papers 35 ( Dept.of Linguistics, Lund University ), 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, W.N. 1995. Prosodic influence on segmental quality. Proc. Eurospeech 95, 1011–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and Halle, M. 1%8. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, A. 1986. Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, K.L. 1980. An initial search for tonics. Language and Speech 23, 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, K.L. 1981. Further experiments in the search for tonics. Language and Speech 24, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. and Darwin, C.J. 1981. Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: Effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency. Perception and Psychophysics 29, 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. and Norris, D.G. 1988. The role of strong syllables in segmenting for lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. and Beckman, M.E. 1988. Articulatory timing and the prosodic interpretation of syllable duration. Phonetica 45, 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, K. 1995. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fant, G. and Kruckenberg, A. 1988. Some durational correlates of Swedish prosody. Proc. Speech ‘88, 7th FASE Symposium, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fear, B.D., Cutler, A. and Butterfield, S. 1995. The strong/weak syllable distinction in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 1893–1904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, H. 1940. Auditory patterns. Reviews of Modern Physics 12, 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D.B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27, 765–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D.B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1, 126152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujisaki, H. and Hirose, K. 1984. Analysis of voice fundamental frequency contours for declarative sentences of Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan (E) 5, 233–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasberg B.R. and Moore B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research 47, 103–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graddol D. 1986. Discourse specific pitch behavior. In C. Johns-Lewis (ed), Intonation in Discourse. London: Croom Helm, 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, C. and Terken, J. 1995. The role of stress and accent in the perception of rhythm. Proc. XIIIth Int. Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol 4, 356–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. and Rietveld, A.C.M. 1988. Fundamental frequency declination in Dutch: testing three hypotheses. Journal of Phonetics 16, 355–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. and Rietveld, A.C.M. 1996. Estimating the location of the `Graph paper’: On the speaker-dependence of the perceived prominence of FO peaks. Ms., Nijmegen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C., Repp, B.H., Rietveld, A.C.M., Rump, H.H. and Terken, J. 1997. The perceptual prominence of fundamental frequency peaks. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102, 3009–3022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa, Y. and Hata, K. 1992. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic cue to accent perception. Language and Speech 35, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘t Hart, J. 1981. Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69, 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ‘t Hart, J. and Cohen, A. 1973. Intonation by rule: A perceptual quest. Journal of Phonetics 1, 309–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘t Hart, J. and Collier, R. 1975. Integrating different levels of intonation analysis. Journal of Phonetics 3, 235–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘t Hart, J., Collier, R. and Cohen, A. 1990. A Perceptual Study of Intonation: An Experimental-Phonetic Approach to Speech Melody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, D.J. 1995. Timing of pitch movements and accentuation of syllables. IPO Annual Progress Report 30, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, D.J. and Van Gestel, J. 1991. The frequency scale of speech intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90, 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermes, D.J. and Rump, H.H. 1994. Perception of prominence in speech intonation induced by rising and falling pitch movements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, D., Di Cristo, A., and Espessser, R. This volume. Levels of representation and levels of analysis for the description of intonation systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, M. 1987. Towards a Discourse-Based Model of English Sentence Intonation. Working Papers 32. ( Dept. of Linguistics, Lund University ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, M. 1990. Empirical evidence for a deletion formulation of the rhythm rule in English. Linguistics 28, 959–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huss, V. 1978. English word stress in the Post-nuclear position. Phonetica 35, 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. 1993. On the theoretical status of the baseline in modelling intonation. Language and Speech 36, 435–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R. 1994. Constraints on the gradient variability of pitch range, or, Pitch level 4 lives! In P. Keating (ed), Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Papers in Laboratory Phonology III. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 43–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D.R., Verhoeven, J., and Jacobs, K. 1994. Influence of adjacent pitch accents on each other’s perceived prominence: two contradictory effects. Journal of Phonetics 22, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenhardt, G. 1996. Automatic Labelling of Prosodic Events. Technical Report, Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M., and Pierrehumbert, J. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In M. Aronoff and R. Oehrle (eds), Language, Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 157–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, M. and Prince, A. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, P. 1965. On the acoustic basis of the perception of intonation by linguists. Word 21, 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines E. and Laroche J. 1995. Non-parametric techniques for pitch-scale and time-scale modification of speech. Speech Communication 16, 175–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Needham, W.P. 1990. Semantic structure, information structure, and intonation in discourse production. Journal of Memory and Language 29, 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy, D. 1976. Modelling Fundamental Frequency, and its Relationship to Syntax, Semantics, and Phonetics. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1979. The perception of fundamental frequency declination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R.D. 1976. Auditory filler shapes derived with noise stimuli. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 640–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1980. Thé Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. Ph.D Thesis, MIT, Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. 1981. Synthesizing intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70, 985–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J.B. and Hirschberg, J. 1990. The meaning f international contours in the interpretation of discourse. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollock (eds), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, A.C.M. and Gussenhoven, C. 1985. On the relation between pitch excursion size and prominence. Journal of Phonetics 13, 299–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rump, H.H. 1996. Prominence of Pitch-Accented Syllables. Ph.D. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology. Eindhoven (NL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rump, H.H. and Collier, R. 1996. Focus conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Language and Speech 39, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rump, H.H. and Hermes, D.J. 1996. Prominence of pitch-accented syllables and the ERB-rate scale, IPO Manuscript no. 1170 ( Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rump, H.H. and Hermes, D.J. 1996. Prominence lent by rising and falling pitch movements: testing two models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing, In J. Goldsmith (ed), Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 550–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. 1994. ‘Stress shift’ as early placement of pitch accents: a comment on Edwards and Beckman. In P. Keating (ed), Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form. Papers in Laboratory Phonology Ill. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. 1995. The importance of phonological transcription in empirical approaches to stress shift versus early accent: comments on Grabe and Warren, and Vogel, Bunnell and Hoskins. In B Connell and A. Arvaniti (eds), Phonology and Phonetic Evidence. Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 128–140.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J., and Hirschberg, J. 1992. ToBI: A Standard for Labelling English Prosody. Proc. International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Banff), 867–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluijter, A.M.C. 1995. Phonetic Correlates of Stress and Accent. Ph.D. Thesis, Leiden University. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics (HIL Dissertations 15 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluijter, A.M.C. and Van Heuven, V.J. 1996. Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100, 2471–2485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens S.S., Volkmann J. and Newman E.B. 1937. A scale for the measurement of the psychological magnitude pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 8, 185–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S.S. and Volkmann, J. 1940. The relation of pitch to frequency: a revised scale. American Journal of Psychology 53, 329–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda, S. and Ichikawa, A. 1994. Analysis of prominence in spoken Japanese sentences and application to text-to-speech synthesis. Speech Communication 14, 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terken, J. 1989. Reaction to C. Gussenhoven and A. Rietveld: Fundamental frequency declination in Dutch: testing three hypotheses. Letter to the Editor. Journal of Phonetics 17, 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terken, J. 1991. Fundamental frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 1768–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terken, J. 1993. Baselines revisited: Reply to Ladd. Language and Speech 36, 453–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terken, J. 1994. Fundamental frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables 11: Non-final syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95, 3662–3665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terken, J. 1997. Variation of accent prominence within the phrase: Models and spontaneous speech data. In Y. Sagisaka, W. Campbell and N. Higuchi (eds), Computing Prosody. New York: Springer, 95–116.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trager, G.L. and Smith, H.L. 1951. An Outline of English Structure Studies in Linguistics. Occasional Papers 3. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller, 11., Branderud, P. and Bigestans, A. 1989. Paralinguistic speech signal transformations. Phonetic Experimental Research, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (PERIL US) 10, 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller, H. and Eriksson, A. 1993. FO-excursions in speech and their perceptual evaluation as evidenced in liveliness estimations. Phonetic Experimental Research, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm (PERILUS) 17, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller, H. and Eriksson, A. 1995. The perceptual evaluation of FO-excursions in speech as evidenced in liveliness estimations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, 1905–1915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Heuven,V. 1987. Stress patterns in Dutch (compound) adjectives: Acoustic measurements and perception data. Phonetica 44, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Katwijk, A. 1974. Accentuation in Dutch. Assen: Van Gorkum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E. 1961. Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands. J. of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicker, E, Flottorp, G. and Stevens, S.S. 1957. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 548–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Research on User-System Interaction, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    Jacques Terken & Dik Hermes

Authors
  1. Jacques Terken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dik Hermes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Lund, Sweden

    Merle Horne

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Terken, J., Hermes, D. (2000). The Perception of Prosodic Prominence. In: Horne, M. (eds) Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Text, Speech and Language Technology, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9413-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5562-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9413-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation