Skip to main content

Making Sense of Laws of Physics

  • Chapter
Causation and Laws of Nature

Part of the book series: Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science ((AUST,volume 14))

Abstract

“I cannot conceive how a body devoid of understanding and sense, truly so called, can moderate and determine its own motions, especially so as to make them conformable to laws that it has no knowledge or apprehension of” (Boyle, [1686] 1979, pp. 181–2). With these words Robert Boyle questioned in a very fundamental way the appropriateness of applying the notion of a law to nature, since only intelligent beings are in a position to obey, or not to obey, laws.1 In this paper I rise to the challenge embodied in Boyle’s remark, and attempt to make sense of laws as they are employed in physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Armstrong, D.M. (1983), What is a Law of Nature?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, Roy (1978), A Realist Theory of Science, Sussex: Harvester

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, John, Brian Ellis and Caroline Lierse (1992), ‘The World as one of a kind: natural necessity and laws of nature’, British Journal for The Philosophy of Science 43, 371–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert ([1663] 1979), ‘A requisite digression concerning those that would exclude the deity from intermeddling with matter’, reprinted in M.A. Stewart (ed.), Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 155–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert ([1685] 1772), ‘High Veneration’, in The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, Volume V, Thomas Birch (ed.), London: J & F Rivington, 130–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert ([1686] 1979), ‘A Free Enquiry into the vulgarly received notion of nature’, reprinted in M.A. Stewart (ed.), Selected Philosophical Papers of Robert Boyle, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 176–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Robert ([1690] 1772), ‘Christian Virtuoso’, in The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle, Volume V, Thomas Birch (ed.), London: J & F Rivington, 508–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How The Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Nancy (1989), Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, Alan (1993a), ‘The lack of excellency of Boyle’s mechanical philosophy’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24, 1993, 541–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, Alan (1993b), ‘So the laws of physics needn’t lie’, Australasian Journal ofPhilosophy 71, 1993, 196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, Maureen (1994), ‘Philosophers versus Chemists Concerning “Laws of Nature”’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 25, 613–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, Rom, and E.H. Madden (1975), Causal Powers, Oxford: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, John (1986), ‘Occult qualities and the experimental philosophy: active principles in pre-Newtonian matter theory’, History of Science 24, 1986, 335–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, Keith (1983), ‘Supernaturalism and the mechanical philosophy’, History of Science 21, 1983, 297–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, James Clerk ([1879] 1965), ‘Thomson and Tait’s Natural Philosophy’, The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, Volume 2, W. D. Niven (ed.), New York: Dover, 776–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. (1977), The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, Jane E. (1986), ‘The origins of scientific “law”’, Journal of the History of Ideas 47, 341–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and S. Schaffer (1985), Leviathan and the Air Pump, Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chalmers, A. (1999). Making Sense of Laws of Physics. In: Sankey, H. (eds) Causation and Laws of Nature. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9229-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9229-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5303-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9229-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics