Abstract
The mathematical theory of probability had its origin, in S. D. Poisson’s words, “in a problem about a game of chance proposed to an austere Jansenist by a man of the world.” The austere Jansenist was, of course, Pascal, and the man of the world the Chevalier de Méré. The simple rules of the probability calculus rapidly acquired a greater significance, and by the end of the seventeenth century James Bernoulli announced, in his Ars Conjectandi, that probability was to be understood as measuring degrees of certainty, and as such constituted the foundation of a new species of logic, the logic of uncertain, or, in modern terminology, of ampliative or inductive inference. Its principal application was to be in effect decision theory, to assist in determining prudent courses of action. Carnap was to say much the same thing two and a half centuries later (in Carnap and Jeffrey [1971] p. 7, for example).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bayes, T. [1763]: ‘An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 53.
Carnap, R. [1950]: Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Carnap, R. and Jeffrey, R.C. [1971]: Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, vol. 1, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. [1988]: ‘Modelling Uncertainty and Inductive Inference: A Survey of Recent Non-additive Systems’, Acta Psychologica, 68, 53–78.
Ellsberg, D. [1961]: ‘Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.
Earman, J. [1992]: Back to Bayesics, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fisher, R.A. [1926]: The Design of Experiments, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
Garber, D. [1983]: ‘Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory’, in Testing Scientific Theories, ed. Earman, J., Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Gärdenfors, P. and Sahlin, N-E [1982]: ‘Unreliable Probabilities, Risk Taking, and Decision Making’, Synthese, 53, 361–386.
Howson, C. and Urbach, P.M. [1989]: Scientific Reasoning; the Bayesian Approach, La Salle: Open Court.
Popper, K.R. [1959]: The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
Raiffa, H. [1961]: ‘Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms: Comment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 690–694.
Smith, C.A.B. [1961]: ‘Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 23, 1–25.
Wason, P.C. [1966]: ‘Reasoning’, in New Horizons in Psychology, ed. Foss, B.M., Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howson, C. (1993). Personalistic Bayesianism. In: Dubucs, JP. (eds) Philosophy of Probability. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8208-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8208-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4301-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-015-8208-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive