Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Analecta Husserliana ((ANHU,volume 18))

  • 244 Accesses

Abstract

Human experience is flux, process, change. It is in the nature of human beings to try to understand this experience (is this not man’s eternal quest for meaning?), but how can we understand this experience, or even talk about it, if this experience is in continual flux? This problem is rendered even more complex with the realization that any attempt to understand human experience becomes, itself, part of the experience. We seem caught, then, much like Virginia Woolf’s record player needle, in a vicious circle that is endlessly retracing itself, a movement which underlines the hopelessness of our ever grasping its significance. Even if some way were found to stop this movement in order to explore it, that too would be futile since the experience would no longer be the same one (flux, process) that we had sought to understand, but some other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Arthur Koestler, ‘Cosmic Consciousness,’ Psychology Today (April 1977): 104.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul Ricoeur, La métaphore vive (Paris: Seuil, 1975). Translation mine.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Monroe Beardsley, ‘The Metaphorical Twist,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22, no. 3 (March 1962): 298; my italics point out the coined word “metaphoricalness,” and the formula “so to speak,” which always introduces a linguistic deviation.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cited by Jacques Derrida, Marges de la philosophie (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1972). Translation mine.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gertrude Buck, ‘The Metaphor: A Study in the Psychology of Rhetoric,’ in Contributions to Rhetorical Theory, vol. 5, ed. Fred Newton Scott (Ann Arbor: Inland Press, 1899), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fred Newton Scott, ed., Contributions to Rhetorical Theory, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Max Black, Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962), p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ricoeur, ‘The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling,’ On Metaphor (1979), p. 141. My use of metaphorical language is intended to underline the necessity and untranslatable quality of “non-literal” language.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David Miller, The Net of Hephaestus: A Study of Modern Criticism and Metaphysical Metaphor (The Hague: Mouton, 1971), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Owen Thomas, Metaphor and Related Subjects (New York: Random House, 1969), p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Terence Hawkes, Metaphor (London: Methuen, 1972), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Christine Brooke-Rose, A Grammar of Metaphor (London: Secker and Warburg, 1958), p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hawkes, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brian Wicker, The Story-Shaped World, Fiction and Metaphysics: Some Variations on a Theme (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975), p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Black, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ricoeur, La métaphore vive, p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Philip Wheelwright, Metaphor and Reality (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1962), p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jean Cohen, Structure du langage poétique (Paris: Flammarion, 1966), p. 15. Translation mine.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marcus Hester, The Meaning of Poetic Metaphor (The Hague: Mouton, 1967), p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ricoeur, On Metaphor, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marshall McLuhan and Wilfred Watson, From Cliché to Archetype (New York: Viking Press, 1970), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ricoeur, On Metaphor, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Martin Foss, Symbol and Metaphor in Human Experience (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1949), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dylan Thomas, Quite Early One Morning (New York: New Directions, 1954), p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard Shiff, ‘Art and Life: A Metaphoric Relationship,’ On Metaphor (1979), p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wicker, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lawlor, P.M. (1984). Metaphor and the Flux of Human Experience. In: Tymieniecka, AT. (eds) The Existential Coordinates of the Human Condition: Poetic — Epic — Tragic. Analecta Husserliana, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6315-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6315-3_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-7987-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6315-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics